07-31-2008 11:59 AM
#1
| |
Hey Cheesehead Management... | |
| |
07-31-2008 12:04 PM
#2
| |
Shame on Brett Favre for putting the Packers in such a tough spot. There's nothing wrong with retiring. But don't retire, almost unretire, see your old team draft 2 QB's to go along with the 1st round pick of 3 years ago, then unretire and make a huge circus. | |
07-31-2008 12:18 PM
#3
| |
| |
| |
07-31-2008 02:52 PM
#4
| |
lol, very funny picture. | |
| |
07-31-2008 03:49 PM
#5
| |
| |
07-31-2008 05:34 PM
#6
| |
I think either way he will be starting week 1 at lambeau. It's the color uniform that still needs to be decided. Can you all imagine Favre playing at lambeau field week 1 on monday night? Fans would be going apeshit. | |
| |
07-31-2008 05:50 PM
#7
| |
| |
| |
07-31-2008 05:56 PM
#8
| |
It would be sad to see Favre play for anyone else except GreenBay. | |
| |
07-31-2008 06:17 PM
#9
| |
LTrain, GB has already said numerous times that there will not be a competition for the starting QB. AR is their starting QB for this season as "they have moved on." Favre is showing up at camp to force GB's hand. He thinks this is the only way he will get released because they do not want distractions in camp. | |
| |
07-31-2008 07:40 PM
#10
| |
|
i dont see how not letting him compete is bad; hes old. they can simply believe it to be more prudent to get a guy who's not gonna retire again soon, plus put them through this kind of fiasco |
07-31-2008 07:46 PM
#11
| |
can we just change his name to farve? that tilts the shit out of me | |
08-01-2008 10:11 AM
#12
| |
Pythonic, I don't disagree, the Packers have made it clear Brett would not be the starter if he stays in GB, but I am just trying to think of how maybe this could be made into a win-win, although the media circus would be potentially damaging. Apparently the Jets were serious about trading for him, but Brett said no. If he wants to play so badly, why not the Jets? I still don't think he is 100% committed to playing and he appears to be dead set on the Vikings if anywhere. The 20 Mil. offer is interesting. I think it would amount to keeping him on ice, and if AR was hurt they would activate Favre, like Testeverde has done the last few years. He would still would have the possibility of playing, but not have to go through the rigors of everday football. | |
| |
08-01-2008 10:36 AM
#13
| |
LT, Favre wants to play for a team who has a chance to go to the superbowl. Why on earth would he go to the Jets? LOL. Especially when they are in the same division as the Pats. I only see him either playing in GB, MN or he will re-retire. | |
| |
08-01-2008 11:20 AM
#14
| |
Everyone wants to play for a team that has a chance to go the superbowl! He wants to play, he wants to start, and he wants to have a chance at a superbowl. He could have had all those things if he simply said months ago, either the first or second time, that he was coming back. He can't expect that he can announce his retirement, waffle for months only to change his mind this late in the game, and then just get everything he wants. I loved watching him all the years, but enough already. If he wants to play, go play for the Jets, otherwise, have a coke and a smile and stfu! | |
| |
08-01-2008 12:01 PM
#15
| |
GB didn't give the guy enough time to decide. They kept pressuring him and pressuring him. Favre was forced to give them an answer when he was not fully decided and that is what stemmed up this whole problem. | |
| |
08-01-2008 12:42 PM
#16
| |
TOM BRADY | |
| |
08-01-2008 12:45 PM
#17
| |
| |
08-01-2008 01:35 PM
#18
| |
| |
08-03-2008 12:55 PM
#19
| |
I think they should just make him back up QB, let him practice play a few downs and give some guidance to Rogers. | |
| |
08-03-2008 01:14 PM
#20
| |
20 million to sit home, wtf? | |
| |
08-03-2008 01:56 PM
#21
| |
| |
| |
08-04-2008 10:20 AM
#22
| |
The 20 Mil. deal was on the table back in March and will just sit on the table with the reinstatement. This type of deal apparently is not out of the ordinary for highly marketable players when they retire, they just used it a little differently in the last negotiations and the media has spun it into something entirely different. For example, when Brett retires, he retains the rights to his image and name unless this deal is in place. My understanding is the Packers would not be able to show any image of him without it, and in that light the offer makes more sense. | |
| |
08-04-2008 11:28 AM
#23
| |
| |
| |