|
IowaSkinsFan
|
02-15-2007, 05:33 AM
Post subject: When to c/r river in low stakes games strategy questions
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 7,148
|
|
I rarely c/r rivers in low stakes games, I barely if ever do it as a bluff, but my quesiton is about when u have the nuts. When do you c/r rivers? Here are factors that make me want to.
1. Opp is aggressive and is likely to have a draw.
2. scare card came and opp is unlikely to call any bets, and any hands he would call hes betting anyway
3. opp is so crazy that hes probably betting if checked too.
Any other factors? And how strong do these ones have to be?
|
|
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
Genitruc
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,463
|
|
These are all pretty good.
If you have a read that villain is super aggro, making a small fishy-looking "blocking bet" can get some ppl to raise/push. If you think they have a missed draw it can be more profitable than C/Raising.
|
|
when the vpip's are high and the value bets are like razors, who can be safe?
|
|
Renton
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
Posts: 5,991
|
|
i'll be captain obvious
When you have the best hand and put your opponent on a hand that he will bet/call if checked to but will only call a bet if bet into.
your welcome
|
|
|
|
Lukie
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: back with a vengeance
Posts: 3,307
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Renton
i'll be captain obvious
When you have the best hand and put your opponent on a hand that he will bet/call if checked to but will only call a bet if bet into.
your welcome
|
this is extremely helpful
thanks for you're awesome contribution
|
|
|
|
elipsesjeff
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 4,900
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Renton
i'll be captain obvious
When you have the best hand and put your opponent on a hand that he will bet/call if checked to but will only call a bet if bet into.
your welcome
|
This is all you need to know. Satisfactory answer for me and I prlly couldn't say it better.
|
Check out my videos at Grinderschool.com
More Full Ring NLHE Cash videos than ANY other poker training site. Training starts at $10/month.
|
|
jackvance
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,910
|
|
I was thinking yesterday I should do it a lot more often.. if they have a hand strong enough to bet on the river, they are calling a c/r 9 times out of 10 anyway at lower stakes. Either that or it's a bluff and they would have folded to a bet (so you already got the extra value). It just seems like whenever I c/r as a bluff it gets called 100% so I really should be doing it more often with the nuts..
|
|
Sarcasm is your body's natural defense against stupidity
|
|
Numbr2intheWorld
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,561
|
|
Also, you can use this tactic on good players, who try to get thin river value.
|
|
|
|
gabe
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: trying to live
Posts: 7,964
|
|
start trying to check raise more and you will get alot better feel for it.
|
|
|
|
IowaSkinsFan
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 7,148
|
|
Do you ever c/r a river where you put opp on a hand range where almost nothing is calling a bet but opp is relatively passive/not aggro?
|
|
|
|
gabe
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: trying to live
Posts: 7,964
|
|
not really, that wouldnt make much sense
|
|
|
|
Numbr2intheWorld
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,561
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by IowaSkinsFan
Do you ever c/r a river where you put opp on a hand range where almost nothing is calling a bet but opp is relatively passive/not aggro?
|
LOL, then he'll check behind... maybe i'm not quite understanding what you are saying.
|
|
|
|
bigspenda73
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Pwnsylvania
Posts: 7,545
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Massimo
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by IowaSkinsFan
Do you ever c/r a river where you put opp on a hand range where almost nothing is calling a bet but opp is relatively passive/not aggro?
|
LOL, then he'll check behind... maybe i'm not quite understanding what you are saying.
|
Well this is your only possible play for extraction if he will never call a bet. Even a passive villian might try to take a pot down once in a while. However, assuming they are never calling the river 100% of the time takes a helluva read.
|
|
|
|
iceit
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 28
|
|
I don't know but when I looked over my stats, the most profitable hands are the made hands that I bet on the river. I also found that in the small stake games if you check a river, it will most likely be checked down, especially if you c/c the flop and turn which puts a doubt in their heads about their TP hand. Now if you raised your opponent on either the flop or turn, the river is definatly checked down on the river.
So basically I think that you should just bet the hand that you have with a good intelligent bet and there is so many bad players in those stakes that you will get called with lesser hands. Slow playing at low stakes is suicide.
|
|
|
|
IowaSkinsFan
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 7,148
|
|
I'm talking about 100nl and 200nl btw (You can include 50nl to)
|
|
|
|
bigspenda73
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Pwnsylvania
Posts: 7,545
|
|
Well I have a hand history from $10nl but I didn't realize your low stakes games are NL100 and NL200.
Anyways, is this a good spot?
Villain is 35/7/4
Ultimate Bet
No Limit Holdem Ring game
Blinds: $0.05./$0.10.
5 players
Converter
Stack sizes:
UTG: $10.45
CO: $1.15
Button: $15.31
Hero: $14.19
BB: $5
Pre-flop: (5 players) Hero is SB with 3 4
UTG calls, CO calls, Button calls, Hero calls, BB checks.
Flop: 2 7 5 ($0.5, 5 players)
Hero bets $0.5, 3 folds, Button calls.
Turn: T ($1.5, 2 players)
Hero bets $1, Button calls.
River: 6 ($3.5, 2 players)
Hero checks...
|
|
|
|
Renton
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
Posts: 5,991
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lukie
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Renton
i'll be captain obvious
When you have the best hand and put your opponent on a hand that he will bet/call if checked to but will only call a bet if bet into.
your welcome
|
this is extremely helpful
you're awesome
|
|
|
|
|
Galapogos
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: The Loser's Lounge
Posts: 2,322
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lukie
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Renton
i'll be captain obvious
When you have the best hand and put your opponent on a hand that he will bet/call if checked to but will only call a bet if bet into.
your welcome
|
this is extremely helpful
thanks for you're awesome contribution
|
Irony anyone?
I like the way Renton put it BTW. And your reasons are the same I use to make this play Iowa.
|

Quote:
|
Originally Posted by sauce123
I don't get why you insist on stacking off with like jack high all the time.
|
|
|
Warpe
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Canuckistan
Posts: 3,905
|
|
Probably shoulda shoved here, but w/e...
Party Poker No-Limit Hold'em, $ Hero (6 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: FlopTurnRiver)
saw flop|saw showdown
CO ($20.05)
Button ($41.14)
SB ($19.64)
Hero ($49.30)
UTG ($50.90)
MP ($38.70)
Preflop: Hero is BB with 7 , A . SB posts a blind of $0.25.
UTG calls $0.50, MP raises to $2, 3 folds, Hero calls $1.50, UTG folds.
Flop: ($4.75) A , 6 , 5 (2 players)
Hero bets $3, MP calls $3.
Turn: ($10.75) K (2 players)
Hero checks, MP bets $3, Hero calls $3.
River: ($16.75) 4 (2 players)
Hero checks, MP bets $8, Hero raises to $24, MP calls $16.
Final Pot: $64.75
Results in white below:
Hero has 7s As (flush, ace high).
MP has 9s 8s (flush, nine high).
Outcome: Hero wins $64.75.
|
|
|
|
Numbr2intheWorld
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,561
|
|
i absolutely hate how that hand is played...
|
|
|
|
bigspenda73
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Pwnsylvania
Posts: 7,545
|
|
Does the c/r need to be a sexy?
Meaning, do you need to have provided the last aggressive action on the turn for a c/r make sense?
|
|
|
|
IowaSkinsFan
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 7,148
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Massimo
i absolutely hate how that hand is played...
|
Why not tell him why instead of just useless flaming?
I think it's hard to figure out a line for that hand. Why did u lead out the flop?
What made you think he was going to be the river?
|
|
|
|
Genitruc
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,463
|
|
warpe played his hand great except for not pushing
leading is good esp when u do it w 2pr/set
turn is standard
|
|
when the vpip's are high and the value bets are like razors, who can be safe?
|
|
Renton
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
Posts: 5,991
|
|
i think i like betting the river in warpeys hand
|
|
|
|
Warpe
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Canuckistan
Posts: 3,905
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by IowaSkinsFan
Why did u lead out the flop?
|
I like to bet my draws to build a pot, take control and get a feel for how strong he is, and I can take the pot right there. I put him on something like AT/AJ-ish or a draw when he just called. AK/AQ raises me here, which I call and then c/c or c/f turn, depending.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by IowaSkinsFan
What made you think he was going to bet the river?
|
He bet the turn, albeit weakly. By just calling I appear like I'm on the draw or looking for a cheap showdown (which I am), but when the draw completes checking the river makes me look afraid of it. He will very often bluff the river b/c I look so weak.
|
|
|
|
Renton
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
Posts: 5,991
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Warpe
He will very often bluff the river b/c I look so weak.
|
what with?
Usually he has a top pairish hand and checks back.
|
|
|
|
zook
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,676
|
|
I agree with Renton. When obvious draws complete I like to bet them (with and without the goods). I think he checks behind here with most non-flush hands, but might call a bet with some of them.
|
|
|
|
Warpe
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Canuckistan
Posts: 3,905
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Renton
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Warpe
He will very often bluff the river b/c I look so weak.
|
what with?
Usually he has a top pairish hand and checks back.
|
If he's bluffing, he doesn't need a hand. To me, my line looks like a weak ace, maybe a lower overpair that I can be blown off.
|
|
|
|
Renton
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
Posts: 5,991
|
|
true, but people just aren't dumb enough to bluff boards like this
|
|
|
|
Renton
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
Posts: 5,991
|
|
im not shitting on your hand wapre, its just an interesting hand to discuss.
I feel that a bet is more +EV than a check (obviously since u have the nuts both plays are +EV) for reasons:
Lets say
he has a huge hand (like he had) 10% of the time, and that he bets/calls when checked to or raises if bet into.
he has a top pair/two pairish type hand 50% of the time and calls up to a 3/4 pot bet but checks if checked to.
the remaining 40% he has nothing or second pair or some crap and knows it can't be good at this point, and will bluff it 100% of the time when checked to (hmm unlikely, but this is hypothetical) with a 13 dollar bet but obviously folds to a raise.
So there are two scenarios, one in which u bet 3/4 of the pot and shove to any raise, and on where u check and shove to any bet.
The ev of a 13 dollar bet is (we'll ignore the current pot since u are always winning that)
(13*.50)+(33.70*.10)= 10.87 dollars
The ev of a check is:
(13*.40)+(33.70*.10)= 8.57 dollars AND THIS IS ASSUMING THAT HE ALWAYS BLUFFS (obv never true).
|
|
|
|
Miffed22001
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Marry Me Cheryl!!!
Posts: 8,181
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Renton
i think i like betting the river in warpeys hand
|
so fucking obvious.
|
|
|
|
Warpe
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Canuckistan
Posts: 3,905
|
|
than you for your valuable input
|
|
|
|
bigspenda73
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Pwnsylvania
Posts: 7,545
|
|
I'd like a comment on my hand up earlier in the post. Is the board not strong enough for open to hold a good second best hand he can bet with?
|
|
|
|
jackvance
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,910
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bigspenda73
I'd like a comment on my hand up earlier in the post. Is the board not strong enough for open to hold a good second best hand he can bet with?
|
10NL is just too passive for this imo..
|
|
Sarcasm is your body's natural defense against stupidity
|
|
sauce123
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Dizzy
Posts: 2,405
|
|
C/R bluff are very rarely a good tactic at 100-200nl Ive found. Im like one for 6 in ones ive tried and the only time they are effective is when villain telegraphs a weak one pair hand mini vbet on riv. AND MAKE IT BIG, cause ppl have to put u on a set/flush/straight and not be seduced by pot odds, so obviously this leaves few opportunities.
For value only against the most aggro of opponents, specially if they are prone to bet missed draws on river, however this would be a long discussion and im tired but essentially a shove overbet on river is almost always better than a C/R (this is also in sklanskys book) and especially at these stakes as ppl tend to put you on a bluff... this actually is in line with what I said above.
In conclusion I love bluff raising river, but almost never checkraising river as a bluff.
Against the right opponents (and as a balancing play) check raising riv for value can be good, but many times overbets are better even OOP.
I could show lots of hands to show this but im tired
Sauce.
|
|
I got more flava than fruitstripe gum
|