|
dalecooper
|
09-06-2008, 09:08 PM
Post subject: Soul read or dipshitism?
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,107
|
|
Bizarre end-of-session hand. Villain was a weirdfish, running like 25/5/1. The "end of session" aspect made me want to fold so as not to cut into my profits on a hunch, but the "weirdfish and weird line" aspect made me want to look him up. The only halfway-notable hand prior to this with villain was a standard one where I raised, he called, then he check/folded the flop. That was one orbit before this.
Full Tilt No-Limit Hold'em, $0.50 BB (6 handed) - Full-Tilt Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com
SB ($74.05)
BB ($46)
UTG ($75.20)
Hero (CO) ($50.35)
Button ($90.50)
Preflop: Hero is CO with :Kc: :Ad:
1 fold, Hero raises to $1.50, 2 folds, BB calls $1
Flop: ($3.25) (2 players)
BB checks, Hero bets $2.50, BB calls $2.50
Turn: ($8.25) (2 players)
BB bets $5, Hero calls $5
River: ($18.25) (2 players)
BB bets $16, Hero calls $16
Total pot: $50.25 | Rake: $2.50
|
|
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
UG
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,855
|
|
Fold > Raise > Call on the turn, but I'm hardly ever calling.
It is a weird line, and the river screams "fuck I missed my draw so I better bet big" or "FU PAY ME BIG," hopefully it's the first one.
|
|
|
|
Fnord
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,336
|
|
Very interested to see what he had.
I check this flop a lot, although given the read I probably bet it as well.
|
|
|
|
dalecooper
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,107
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Fnord
Very interested to see what he had.
I check this flop a lot, although given the read I probably bet it as well.
|
I tend to check this against better players and LAggs - here I figured a bet was fine.
|
|
|
|
bode
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: May 2006
Location: slow motion
Posts: 4,270
|
|
is it that bad that im betting this flop like 100% IP?
|
Quote:
|
eeevees are not monies yet...they are like baby monies.
|
|
|
Fnord
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,336
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bode
is it that bad that im betting this flop like 100% IP?
|
It depends on your table image, opener size and opponent.
Overall, I think most multi-taggs c-bet too much partiularly on boards that missed almost all of their range.
I open small and have a very aggro stationy image. Hence, I'm less inclined to bet here (I get called and bluff raised a lot) and will even call a bet on a blanked turn. (I also like to induce, particuarly against players who suck at thin value betting.)
|
|
|
|
dalecooper
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,107
|
|
^ Agreed. I also don't like c-betting so much on boards that invite action from aggro players when I have missed badly and feel uncomfortable playing a big pot. Anything that looks like combo draw territory, with someone who likes to checkraise, makes me think about playing the hand more passively.
|
|
|
|
bode
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: May 2006
Location: slow motion
Posts: 4,270
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Fnord
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bode
is it that bad that im betting this flop like 100% IP?
|
It depends on your table image, opener size and opponent.
Overall, I think most multi-taggs c-bet too much partiularly on boards that missed almost all of their range.
|
this is probably why ive been losing too much money in non-showdown pots lately.
|
Quote:
|
eeevees are not monies yet...they are like baby monies.
|
|
|
dalecooper
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,107
|
|
On the turn I was thinking villain's range was a lot of draws (esp. combo draws) and weak pairs - given the raggy board, maybe something like 55, 77, A6, 98, that sort of thing. I was thinking calling vs. the draws was fine but raising vs. the pairs would be better; then again I wasn't sure villain would fold the pairs if raised. I ended up defaulting to the easiest choice.
For reference, here's a hand where a better player takes the same line, but the board and my holdings are slightly different:
Full Tilt No-Limit Hold'em, $0.50 BB (6 handed) - Full-Tilt Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com
BB ($75.95)
UTG ($26.45)
MP ($102.50)
Hero (CO) ($61.65)
Button ($13.05)
SB ($64.45)
Preflop: Hero is CO with 
2 folds, Hero raises to $1.50, 1 fold, SB calls $1.25, 1 fold
Flop: ($3.50) :Ac: (2 players)
SB checks, Hero bets $2.50, SB calls $2.50
Turn: ($8.50) (2 players)
SB bets $5.50, Hero raises to $16, 1 fold
Total pot: $19.50 | Rake: $0.95
|
|
|
|
Genitruc
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,463
|
|
It can be fine but I'd prefer waiting for a strong read to call this one... doesn't sound like you really had it and this guy can def bet 55 here like a weirdo.
|
|
when the vpip's are high and the value bets are like razors, who can be safe?
|
|
dalecooper
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,107
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Genitruc
It can be fine but I'd prefer waiting for a strong read to call this one... doesn't sound like you really had it and this guy can def bet 55 here like a weirdo.
|
I agree. In any case, results in white: Villain had 5h 9h and MHIG. I'm thinking about starting my own theorem based on the two hands posted here - something along the lines of "you can't go too wrong playing like a spewmonkey against people who check/call the flop and then donk the turn."
|
|
|
|
Clushy
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 4
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Fnord
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bode
is it that bad that im betting this flop like 100% IP?
|
Overall, I think most multi-taggs c-bet too much partiularly on boards that missed almost all of their range.
|
this is definitely true, but we are playing against a 25/5/1 who clearly isn't a thinking player and is going to be playing too passive OOP. i`d be betting this flop 100% of the time for value expecting to get ch/cd by draws i beat and weakish hands i expect to fold out by the river with multiple barrels.
as played, i like the river call. his range of hands he takes for value that way is v slim and i'd expect to be good well over 32% of the time.
|
|
|
|
Silly String
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: KC, MO
Posts: 1,434
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by UG
Fold > Raise > Call on the turn, but I'm hardly ever calling.
It is a weird line, and the river screams "fuck I missed my draw so I better bet big" or "FU PAY ME BIG," hopefully it's the first one.
|
If this is your assessment of his bet tell & his range then I would think Call >>>> would be far better than Raise.
As for the hand, I see this from 55,77 or 99 type hands from semi- competent players. Usually a marginal hand that doesn't want to see the turned draw hit for free if checked through or even A/K overcards. I don't think he was thought of as competent at this point. I usually let go of the turn, but the river bet stinks to the high heavens of a bluff since he's not thin VBing that much evar!
|
|
Playing live . . . thanks alot Bin Laden.
|