|
Galapogos
|
03-03-2008, 09:25 PM
Post subject: Raised at the river and he should only have one better hand
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: The Loser's Lounge
Posts: 2,323
|
|
Villain is 24/10/1.7
I don't have any recollection of him getting out of hand. Is this river an easy call? He thought for a bit before making the raise.
Texas Hold'em $1-$2 NL (real money), hand #P4-62115422-487
Table fetrand's HE, 3 Mar 2008 6:58 PM ET
Seat 1: ludo 59 ($71.95 in chips)
Seat 2: NCassady ($103.05 in chips)
Seat 3: Duckfighterz ($173.40 in chips)
Seat 4: rejic ($154.85 in chips)
Seat 8: Galapogos [ 7 ,A ] ($105.15 in chips)
Seat 9: Charli010 ($90.35 in chips)
Antes/Blinds
Galapogos posts blind ($0.50), Charli010 posts blind ($1).
Pre-Flop
ludo 59 folds, NCassady calls $1, Duckfighterz folds, rejic calls $1, Galapogos calls $0.50, Charli010 checks.
Flop [board cards 7 ,K ,A ]
Galapogos bets $3, Charli010 folds, NCassady calls $3, rejic calls $3.
Turn [board cards 7,K,A,4 ]
Galapogos bets $10, NCassady calls $10, rejic folds.
River [board cards 7,K,A,4,3 ]
Galapogos bets $20, NCassady bets $62, Galapogos calls $42
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by sauce123
I don't get why you insist on stacking off with like jack high all the time.
|
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
JL
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,095
|
|
Fold because he has 65 of spades!!!
Haha just joking. You have to call this.
The title of the thread is the reason why you have to call.
|
|
|
|
Ash256
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 1,760
|
|
wtf? 5s6s? AA/KK?
|
|
|
|
will641
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: getting my swell on
Posts: 1,610
|
|
eh call. and bet the turn harder.
|
|
Cash Rules Everything Around Me.
|
|
dalecooper
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,107
|
|
That's a crying call, I guess. Very curious what he had though.
|
|
|
|
Galapogos
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: The Loser's Lounge
Posts: 2,323
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dalecooper
That's a crying call, I guess. Very curious what he had though.
|
JL was right, he had 56 spades. I honestly am still not sure this should be a call. I'm up against a very straight forward uncreative nittish villain. I've shown a lot of strength in this hand so far and no one at this level bluffs the river. Plus, this guy's too weak to raise a crappier two pair he picked up on the river. I absolutely knew he had that hand too when he raised, but I just couldn't get myself to fold when I could only put him on one hand that beat me.
Maybe I'm just being a bitch about losing.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by sauce123
I don't get why you insist on stacking off with like jack high all the time.
|
|
|
SmackinYaUp
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: B N L
Posts: 1,725
|
|
My first thought was a shortstacked fish who hit a weaker 2 pair.
|
|
He who drinks beer sleeps well.
He who sleeps well cannot sin.
He who does not sin goes to Heaven.
|
|
Deanglow
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: lol
Posts: 2,443
|
|
I would fold this pretty quick. All types of weird slowplayed and backdoor stuff comes up in these spots. No way he raises for value worse.
|
|
|
|
Galapogos
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: The Loser's Lounge
Posts: 2,323
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SmackinYaUp
My first thought was a shortstacked fish who hit a weaker 2 pair.
|
For some reason Ongame calls it 1-2NL but it is actually 100NL and we're both full-stacked.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by sauce123
I don't get why you insist on stacking off with like jack high all the time.
|
|
|
dalecooper
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,107
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Galapogos
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dalecooper
That's a crying call, I guess. Very curious what he had though.
|
JL was right, he had 56 spades. I honestly am still not sure this should be a call. I'm up against a very straight forward uncreative nittish villain. I've shown a lot of strength in this hand so far and no one at this level bluffs the river. Plus, this guy's too weak to raise a crappier two pair he picked up on the river. I absolutely knew he had that hand too when he raised, but I just couldn't get myself to fold when I could only put him on one hand that beat me.
Maybe I'm just being a bitch about losing. |
Despite all that & knowing the outcome, I'm OK with the call. I think even weak, uncreative nits might give you a little value raise with A3 or A4 on that river at times. I think you're beat a lot here, but not so definitely beat that it's a clear fold.
|
|
|
|
Lukie
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: back with a vengeance
Posts: 3,307
|
|
i've found that when you are quite sure that they have the one hand that they 'have to have', they pretty much always have it.
that said, i prob call this river but i'm a taggfish 
|
|
|
|
Galapogos
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: The Loser's Lounge
Posts: 2,323
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lukie
that said, i prob call this river but i'm a taggfish |
Hmmm, this is a disturbing revelation as much of my game was constructed off your old strategy posts.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by sauce123
I don't get why you insist on stacking off with like jack high all the time.
|
|
English
Deutsch
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Pусский
Svenska
06-02-2012, 08:10 PM Merge Network 6.0 Looks to Retain Current Player Base
Linear Mode
