|
Miffed22001
|
11-27-2006, 02:58 PM
Post subject: Preflop wargames.
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Marry Me Cheryl!!!
Posts: 8,181
|
|
Villain is 23/18/3
Hero is 23/17/3
Full Tilt Poker (6 max) - $2/$4 - No Limit Hold'em -
Seat 1: MstAA mAArtini ($782.25)
Seat 2: scrapper41 ($403.50)
Seat 3: KKinski ($542.30)
Seat 4: Villain ($506.80)
Seat 5: foxfox1 ($388)
Seat 6: Hero ($622.30)
KKinski posts the small blind of $2 Villain posts the big blind of $4
The button is in seat #2
Holecards:
Dealt to Hero [Qs] [Qd]
foxfox1 folds
Hero raises to $14
foxfox1 adds $12
MstAA mAArtini calls $14
scrapper41 folds
KKinski folds
Villain raises to $58
Hero has 15 seconds left to act
Hero raises to $190
MstAA mAArtini folds
Villain has 15 seconds left to act
Villain raises to $506.80 and is all in
Hero ?????
Can/should hero call here?
|
|
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
Lukie
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: back with a vengeance
Posts: 3,307
|
|
Hmmm, I hate 4-betting here if we don't know how we're going to react to a shove. Even more specifically, I hate 4-betting here unless we have intentions of calling a push, since you're effectively turning a huge hand into a bluff (in my experience, many people have the huge leak of always folding or 5-bet pushing over a 4-bet and never calling). And by 'huge hand', I mean it in such a way that you think you're ahead of his range enough to put in that 3rd raise. If you're not way ahead of his range, just call pre.
As played, I can't really see folding queens after putting in 40% of my stack pre, lol.
|
|
|
|
andy-akb
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Maine
Posts: 1,836
|
|
I have to agree with Lukie here. If you are 4betting, you should be calling a push. If you arent calling the push, dont 4bet. I just call the reraise and go from there, our hand has too much value to fold to a PF 3bet and on that same note it also has too much value to turn into a bluff.
|
|
|
|
spoonitnow
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: IRC Chat Room
Posts: 5,406
|
|
If I counted it right we'd have to call $316 in a pot of $520, getting ~5:3, have to win about 38% of the time to breakeven.
We're 40% against AK, KK+, and 18% against KK+.
So let's say we're against AK, KK+ 30% of the time, and we're against KK+ 50% of the time, and we're against 37o 20% of the time just for kicks (87% favorite).
This gives us an equity of 12 + 9 + 17.4 = 38.4%.
Seems pretty clear that we shouldn't call.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ripptyde
I only have 2 simple rules when I am coaching a new student.
Rule # 1: don't ask questions
Rule # 2: don't ask questions
I have no interest in discussing strategy with a protege'. Your job is to remain quiet and listen. I have a very systematic approach that I will share with the right candidate and I promise that I will turn you into a force of nature and show you elements of the game of poker that you never knew existed.
|
|
|
Warpe
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Canuckistan
Posts: 3,905
|
|
Why 4-bet in this spot? Call the initial rr and see a flop.
As played...well, you've got over 1/3 of your stack in...but it's a cursing fold, imo.
|
|
|
|
Renton
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
Posts: 5,992
|
|
i realize that you 4bet to avoid playing a multiway pot here, but thats just what you are going to have to do.
You need a read that villain is a squeezeplaying fool in order to make this 4bet.
|
|
|
|
Miffed22001
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Marry Me Cheryl!!!
Posts: 8,181
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by spoonitnow
If I counted it right we'd have to call $316 in a pot of $520, getting ~5:3, have to win about 38% of the time to breakeven.
We're 40% against AK, KK+, and 18% against KK+.
So let's say we're against AK, KK+ 30% of the time, and we're against KK+ 50% of the time, and we're against 37o 20% of the time just for kicks (87% favorite).
This gives us an equity of 12 + 9 + 17.4 = 38.4%.
Seems pretty clear that we shouldn't call.
|
if we assume villains felting range is AKs/AKo/AA/KK/QQ our equity is 40%.
Good call?
FWIW, i didnt play this hand, i posted it out of interest. I would probably still make the reraise but then fold to the 4bet and find a better spot.
Is that a whole better line than calling the raise and going three handed to the flop?
|
|
|
|
Lukie
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: back with a vengeance
Posts: 3,307
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by spoonitnow
If I counted it right we'd have to call $316 in a pot of $520, getting ~5:3, have to win about 38% of the time to breakeven.
We're 40% against AK, KK+, and 18% against KK+.
So let's say we're against AK, KK+ 30% of the time, and we're against KK+ 50% of the time, and we're against 37o 20% of the time just for kicks (87% favorite).
This gives us an equity of 12 + 9 + 17.4 = 38.4%.
Seems pretty clear that we shouldn't call.
|
I don't get it. It looks like a tiny edge favoring a call. I'd also argue that metagame reasons take importance over minimizing veriance, also favoring a call. I also realize that you're weighting the hands screwy... in that giving the guy 37o (bluff) 20% is appreciated but unnecessary. The only real 'bluffs' here are hands like small pairs and Axs since they obviously can't take a flop but still have decent equity, and people for some reason sometimes 4-bet putting in nearly half their stack yet still consider folding a hand as strong as QQ. Anyway, Counting KK in the KK+ and AK/KK range is unfair unless he's playing against lukie, because then it is fairly accurate.
Even if we give the guy an absurdly tight range, and one that's ahead of KK equity wise, this is still a call. He pretty much has to be a nit that will only push KK/AA here to fold (certainly applies to some players).
Text results appended to pokerstove.txt
287,667,072 games 0.313 secs 919,064,127 games/sec
Board:
Dead:
equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 39.8574 % 39.64% 00.22% { QQ }
Hand 2: 60.1426 % 59.92% 00.22% { KK+, AKs, AKo }
|
|
|