Poker Forum

Over 1,247,000 Posts!

Subscribe to FTR web feed
Already Registered?      Username:    Password:   Remember      Forgot Password
  >    > 

NL Article

  
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Fnord
Old 03-16-2004, 07:00 PM     Post subject: NL Article #1 (permalink)  
Fnord's Avatar
Moderator

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,336
Fnord is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via MSN to Fnord
One of the rare quality articles on No-Limit strategy.

Interesting contrasts to this site. The style they advocate is closer to the No Limit section of Super System.

http://www.winningonlinepoker.com/nolimit.htm
Reply With Quote
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
gutshot
Old 03-16-2004, 09:58 PM #2 (permalink)  
Full House

Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: lemonade was a popular drink and it still is
Posts: 608
gutshot
Good article.

I have had my nose stuck in HEPFAP for the past couple weeks and never really bothered to notice the distinction between limit and no-limit strategies. I printed out all of Tyson's articles as well as the contributed articles from yourself and Eric last night and read them at home.

In particular what caught my eye was the Ax in hand article and the points were reiterated in the article you posted.

I played was in the money on 3 out of 4 SNGs last nite after reading over the articles and checking how hands play differently than what Sklansky proposes.

I'm gonna keep building my roll in SNG and hopefully move back to $25NL next month.

As always, excellent stuff here. Thanks!
-jay

"i think the biggest leak in my game is using 2nd level thinking against players who can't think on the first level." -Renton
 
Reply With Quote
ttanaka
Old 03-16-2004, 10:38 PM #3 (permalink)  
ttanaka's Avatar
Administrator
Administrator

Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,184
ttanaka has disabled reputation
Read that article. It is interesting suggesting a fold with AJo and KJo in an unraised pot. I understand what they're saying, laydown a hand that has the ability to win you a small pot but lose you a huge pot.

Do you guys agree? I always play AJo or KJo in an unraised pot, and even look to raise with with AJo if the waters seem safe. Perhaps this is not the best way to play this?

I guess the other factor is - can you laydown your top pair strong kicker? Will you, in fact, lose a huge pot in the scenarios suggested with AJo, KJo, AQ, and KQ?

The article also likes Axs hands from all positions in an unraised pot. I've vacilated between playing these hands from any position in an unraised pot to just playing these hands in mid-late position (which is how I've currently been playing them).

I'd like to here your thoughts, thanks!
Reply With Quote
Fnord
Old 03-17-2004, 12:00 AM #4 (permalink)  
Fnord's Avatar
Moderator

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,336
Fnord is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via MSN to Fnord
It depends on how deep the money is. The taller my stack is the more I avoid hands like KJ and QJ and the more careful I get with AQ. I recently lost 2 big hands with it (one for $50) and took it as a lesson learned. Although, oddly enough I haven't had problems with KQ. It also depend on what people are playing. If other players are calling pre-flop raises with hands like KJ and QJ, then by all means raise up AJ!

Pyramid of domination:
Code:
  AK
 AQ KQ
AJ KJ QJ
Personally, I think the biggest flaws in your pre-flop articles are advocating micro-raises (I fail to see the point), undervaluing tight and semi-tight suited connectors in late position and any pocket pair in any position for up to 5-10% of the smaller stack.
Reply With Quote
ttanaka
Old 03-17-2004, 12:35 AM #5 (permalink)  
ttanaka's Avatar
Administrator
Administrator

Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,184
ttanaka has disabled reputation
Hmm... yeah I should review those essays, my strategy has been evolving.

The micro-raises... I don't even remember where I do that - I don't use min. raises, $1.50 will be the smallest raise these days (blind + $1.00 raise) - they are like a straight up value bet.

The suited connectors I do play in late, just haven't documented that final Grouping of late position hands. I usually do not play the semi-connected hands or the low suited-connectors in late, but that all depends on the amount of limpers in the pot - the more, the looser I go.

Pocket pairs are fun. I call small raises automatically - $1.00-$1.50 (blind + $.50-$1.00), but not automatically up to 10% (ie $2.50). Then I use my better judgment - opponent style, number of opponents, etc.

I need to review those pre-flop essays... sounds like my strategies have shifted since I first drafted those...

That's the cool thing about holdem, you can never stop improving your game.
Reply With Quote
Fnord
Old 03-17-2004, 01:33 AM #6 (permalink)  
Fnord's Avatar
Moderator

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,336
Fnord is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via MSN to Fnord
I think you got suited connectors and semi-connectors wrong.

The problem with following lots of limpers with them is if you have 4c 5c and the board comes:

Qs 5d 5h

You may very well the second best hand if there is a lot of junk being played! Also, consider that newbies love to slow play trips and more seasoned players like steal when the board shows a pair, so being on the button doesn't help as much here. Hence I like this board better on a table with a few tight players.

Also, on the issue of tight vs semi-tight. A tight connector will flop a straight or inside straight draw more often. However if you flop two pair very often there will be a possible straight on the board. Also if you flop a straight there will often be another (better) straight possible and the board will often look like a scary straight board. Semi-tight connectors flop a safer 2 pair and a more deceptive straight at the cost of flopping a straight or inside straight draw less often. I need to run numbers, but for now I value each equally if I think I got good implied odds on my 1-2x BB (nice and tall stacks limping in with me.)
Reply With Quote
ttanaka
Old 03-17-2004, 02:05 AM #7 (permalink)  
ttanaka's Avatar
Administrator
Administrator

Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,184
ttanaka has disabled reputation
That's interesting. When I see a lot of limpers in a pot, I immediately think implied odds, at which point I loosen some of my late position hands,
looking for the right flop and the big payday.
Reply With Quote
Fnord
Old 03-17-2004, 02:34 AM #8 (permalink)  
Fnord's Avatar
Moderator

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,336
Fnord is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via MSN to Fnord
Quote:
Originally Posted by ttanaka
That's interesting. When I see a lot of limpers in a pot, I immediately think implied odds, at which point I loosen some of my late position hands,
looking for the right flop and the big payday.
As long as there is a good chance someone is around to payoff your monster...

I guess the point I tried to make was.... You got a 7 and a 5 of spades on the button. Which table would you rather be at?

Table 1: (tight passive)
UTG tried to limp-raise with pocket rockets (no one bit yet)
A couple random pocket pairs
A dominated hand or two like AJ, KTs, etc looking for a cheap flop.

Table 2: (loose aggressive)
Half the table filled with players that will play and 2 cards with pips and bet second pair.

IMHO, I'd rather be at table 1 in that particular situation. My trips, bottom two pair or non-nut flush is a safer hand to go nuclear with and I got a better shot of stealing the pot with on a draw (including any pair), well... ok maybe if the UTG Aces weren't there...
Reply With Quote
Reply
Latest Poker News
Bbickes Old 06-02-2012, 08:10 PM    Merge Network 6.0 Looks to Retain Current Player Base
In an effort to perhaps keep players from moving to the new Revolution Network setup by the former Lock Poker, Merge Network has taken drastic steps to respond to their player base's requests to impro ...

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 07:22 PM.


FTR Testimonials

All content
© FlopTurnRiver.com
Advertising  |   Partners  |   Testimonials  |   T&C  |   Contact Us  |   FTR News & Press  |   Site Map  |   Search FTR

Full Tilt  |   Titan Poker  |   UltimateBet  |   Poker Stars  |   Ladbrokes Bonus  |   Sportsbook  |   Cake Poker  

Play Texas Holdem Online, Online Texas Holdem Strategy, & Poker Forum
This is not a gambling website.