|
Marshall28
|
09-11-2008, 12:24 AM
Post subject: Marshall28's stuff {split from Massimo's thread}
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,198
|
|
how does one do this for 6 months.....

then proceed to do this for the following 6 months....
|
|
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
Fnord
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,339
|
|
o Regs started counter-punching
o Not shifting gears against players who won't back down to your aggression
o Blowing people off worse hands, not inducing bluffs from people just itching to float you.
o Too much cheap street aggression building big pot with marginal holdings against opponents who otherwise suck too hard to win a big pot with a big hand.
o Running bad tilt, turning lots of little things into a very big thing
|
|
|
|
Genitruc
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,463
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Fnord
o Regs started counter-punching
o Not shifting gears against players who won't back down to your aggression
o Blowing people off worse hands, not inducing bluffs from people just itching to float you.
o Too much cheap street aggression building big pot with marginal holdings against opponents who otherwise suck too hard to win a big pot with a big hand.
o Running bad tilt, turning lots of little things into a very big thing
|
this
|
|
when the vpip's are high and the value bets are like razors, who can be safe?
|
|
Irisheyes
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: over there
Posts: 3,708
|
|
1) Variance
2) Not changing with the games
3) Not taking responsibility for your own play
|
|
|
|
griffey24
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Toronto'ish
Posts: 4,611
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Irisheyes
1) Variance
2) Not changing with the games
3) Not taking responsibility for your own play
|
All 3 of these are pretty big.
I have a very similar thing happening to me right now actually.
Variance is a big part of it. But I think mostly is that when you're winning consistently, you feel invincible and that you can beat anyone, and you don't really look at your game enough. You don't try improving, but everyone else is improving in the meantime.
Only when you're losing do you stop to think that something is wrong. Which is probably not the best way to go about thigns.
Games are definitely getting harder as well, or at least on my site.
|
|
|
|
Marshall28
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,198
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Fnord
o Too much cheap street aggression building big pot with marginal holdings against opponents who otherwise suck too hard to win a big pot with a big hand.
|
this point is interesting to me ... could you elaborate a little on it and give some examples? ... i think it probably is one of the big problems.
|
|
|
|
Fnord
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,339
|
|
Every $ that goes into the pot in big bet poker raises the effective stakes for the next raise or street (assuming there is plenty of money left to bet.)
By the mid stakes people get that, just like they get how position is good too, but they don't really get just how important it is.
When you're betting/raising on the cheap streets (usually pre-flop and the flop) a lot it has a couple effects that can pwn you on future streets. It tightens up our opponent's range and it builds the pot. So we tend to face stronger hands for bigger stakes. I think at some point a naked thin +EV bet becomes -EV because we will sometimes continue to play the hand with the worst of it for more money than if we checked behind.
Also, sometimes our aggression allows strong holdings to hide under the shadow of our aggression and still get good value without defining their hand as much as they would have to if we kept the pot a bit smaller or let our opponent to continue to define his own hand with (poorly applied) aggression.
Stuff to consider: Opening bet size, 3-bet size/frequency. Cold call vs 3-bet range, limp behind vs iso-raise range, c-bet frequency, etc. All spots where you can adjust your range to either exploit people who fold a lot on cheap streets or tighten up to have a stronger overall range when they don't.
|
|
|
|
IowaSkinsFan
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 7,148
|
|
Said perfectly fnord
|
|
|
|
kmind
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Not Giving In
Posts: 4,240
|
|
Very nice tips.
|
|
|
|
seatown1two
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 16
|
|
I like this..
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Fnord
Every $ that goes into the pot in big bet poker raises the effective stakes for the next raise or street (assuming there is plenty of money left to bet.)
By the mid stakes people get that, just like they get how position is good too, but they don't really get just how important it is.
When you're betting/raising on the cheap streets (usually pre-flop and the flop) a lot it has a couple effects that can pwn you on future streets. It tightens up our opponent's range and it builds the pot. So we tend to face stronger hands for bigger stakes. I think at some point a naked thin +EV bet becomes -EV because we will sometimes continue to play the hand with the worst of it for more money than if we checked behind.
Also, sometimes our aggression allows strong holdings to hide under the shadow of our aggression and still get good value without defining their hand as much as they would have to if we kept the pot a bit smaller or let our opponent to continue to define his own hand with (poorly applied) aggression.
Stuff to consider: Opening bet size, 3-bet size/frequency. Cold call vs 3-bet range, limp behind vs iso-raise range, c-bet frequency, etc. All spots where you can adjust your range to either exploit people who fold a lot on cheap streets or tighten up to have a stronger overall range when they don't.
|
Could you post a couple of good examples of this?
|
|
|