|
donkbee
|
07-30-2007, 01:32 AM
Post subject: KK and 67s ($100NL, Stars)
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
WELP
Join Date: May 2005
Location: so close but so far
Posts: 3,605
|
|
1) Line check. Villain is 31/7/1.2 over 70 hands. I feel like this is a stupid hand to post, but I will post anyway.
PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $1.00 BB (6 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: FlopTurnRiver)
Hero ($141.15)
Button ($127.90)
SB ($79.25)
BB ($137.10)
UTG ($166.55)
MP ($19)
Preflop: Hero is CO with K , K .
2 folds, Hero raises to $4, 1 fold, SB calls $3.50, 1 fold.
Flop: ($9) A , T , 6 (2 players)
SB checks, Hero bets $8, SB calls $8.
Turn: ($25) 7 (2 players)
SB checks, Hero checks.
River: ($25) 4 (2 players)
SB bets $10, Hero calls $10.
2) Do I just call on the flop? If I'm going to raise, I should raise less, right? As played, fold?
PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $1.00 BB (6 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: FlopTurnRiver)
MP ($168.20)
CO ($94.50)
Button ($101)
Hero ($129.60)
BB ($128.50)
UTG ($132.45)
Preflop: Hero is SB with 6 , 7 .
1 fold, MP raises to $4, CO calls $4, 1 fold, Hero calls $3.50, 1 fold.
Flop: ($13) 7 , 4 , K (3 players)
Hero checks, MP bets $8, CO calls $8, Hero raises to $32, MP calls $24, CO raises to $90.5, Hero ...
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fnord
Why poker fucks with our heads: it's the master that beats you for bringing in the paper, then gives you a milkbone for peeing on the carpet.
|
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
I Like Pie
|
|
Flush
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 399
|
|
Hand 1: Looks fine to me. I usually play it like that.
Hand 2: I don't mind getting me chips in the middle on flops like that but I'd rather do the pushing than the calling. So I like to lead hoping to get raised then shove. Check/raising is fine too, but you're in a tough spot that particular hand, he's probably got a set so you just gotta figured out if you're committed.
|
|
|
|
bigspenda73
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Pwnsylvania
Posts: 7,546
|
|
I see nothing wrong with calling the flop in hand 2 once you check it.
|
|
|
|
thizzSantaCruz
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Santa Cruz
Posts: 894
|
|
real quick question...isn't checking KK on an A high flop supposed to be std...isn't that one of those way ahead way behind scenarios?
I think calling is fine in hand 2 as well but as played stick it in the middle and spike a spade.
|
|
|
|
bigspenda73
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Pwnsylvania
Posts: 7,546
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by thizzSantaCruz
real quick question...isn't checking KK on an A high flop supposed to be std...isn't that one of those way ahead way behind scenarios?
I think calling is fine in hand 2 as well but as played stick it in the middle and spike a spade.
|
not when a players calling range PF is weighted towards pairs.
|
|
|
|
Vi-Zer0Skill
|
|
Reagan's Kid
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,742
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bigspenda73
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by thizzSantaCruz
real quick question...isn't checking KK on an A high flop supposed to be std...isn't that one of those way ahead way behind scenarios?
I think calling is fine in hand 2 as well but as played stick it in the middle and spike a spade.
|
not when a players calling range PF is weighted towards pairs.
|
Are you referring to hand #1? When a player is playing ~30% of their cards PF, their range is going to be a lot wider than mostly pairs. However, i still agree that we need to bet the flop in this spot, because villains range is so wide we need to bet to figure out where we are in the hand.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Carroters
Ambition is fucking great, but you're trying to dig up gold with a rocket launcher and are going to blow the whole lot to shit unless you refine your tools
|
|