Poker Forum

Over 1,247,000 Posts!

Subscribe to FTR web feed
Already Registered?      Username:    Password:   Remember      Forgot Password
  >    > 

An interesting NL problem to get you thinking...

  
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
ArcticKnight
Old 03-10-2005, 01:26 AM     Post subject: An interesting NL problem to get you thinking... #1 (permalink)  
ArcticKnight's Avatar
Flush

Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: golf course
Posts: 416
ArcticKnight
Hi

I usually lurk in the LHE thread, but I have come over to the dark side (lol) for an interesting, semi-tricky hypothetical question.

Lets suppose the following.

It’s Heads-up NL and each player has $1000 (this is cash, not a tourney)
Pre-flop the SB raises to $50 and the BB calls. That’s $100 in the pot
For some reason you both agree to flip your hands up pre-flop, but still play out the hand

Player A has JcJs and Player B has JhJd
The flop comes 10c, 2c, 4c

Yet to come is a post-flop bet, turn card, possible turn bet, river card, and possible river bet.

The question is who wins the pot (or is it split), and how much is the pot when it is taken down? I believe there is only one correct answer, assuming that both players are very good and know what they are doing.

I’ll post the answer later, but I’m sure someone will come up with it in the meantime.

PS. If you have seen this one before and are absolutely sure of the answer, it might be better if you did not post so that others could work it out. If you have not seen this before, then go for it
Gone golfing ..see ya in the Fall of 2006
PS. What did the snail on the turtle's back say?
Wheeeeeeeee........
 
Reply With Quote
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
Demiparadigm
Old 03-10-2005, 01:43 AM #2 (permalink)  
Demiparadigm's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Party 6 max
Posts: 1,602
Demiparadigm
Player B has no outs to win, and has to dodge 9 cards twice to split. (the remaining clubs.)

Therefore 65% of the time the pot will be split and 35% Player A wins.

Player B must fold to any bet by Player A.
So, Player A wins $50
Reply With Quote
Aceofone
Old 03-10-2005, 01:56 AM #3 (permalink)  
Flush

Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 497
Aceofone
Depends on who is in what position.

2 possible plays.

1. Player A w/ Jc is on button, flop comes and player B bets out with his overpair, Player A will now assume that Player B Has at best TPTK because if he flopped the flush he would check to entice a bet. Player A will then Raise All in believing that he has any board pair beat and his flush outs arent dead.
Player B will be faced with the massive raise and will probably fold, not wanting to gamble his entire stack.

This could be altered depending on how long the heads up match has been going {not specified}, the earlier in the match, the more likely it is that Player B will fold.

2. Player B w/o Jc is on button, flop comes and Player A bets out with his overpair and 4-flush. Sounds similiar right? This time Player B will almost invariably make a massive raise, both will wind up allin. Then we're back to percentages.


Quote:
I believe there is only one correct answer
I don't believe there is ever ONLY 1 answer.
To many external variables that cant be controlled (e.g. moods).
Reply With Quote
whileone
Old 03-10-2005, 02:02 AM #4 (permalink)  
whileone's Avatar
Flush

Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 306
whileone
A has a chance to make a little bit more money. if player A just bets a buck, player B is getting odds for a refund. I think player A needs to bet 9/47 * $50 to give coinflip odds on B's fifty bucks. Then, if the club misses A needs to bet 9/46 * 50 + ~$10 (the 9/47*50) to give coinflip odds on B's hand to see the next card. i don't see any point in betting on the river, if A gets the flush, it's over.

As far as A is concerened, the worst that can happen is a split pot, but with a really small bet A gets a coinflip for more of B's money.
Noooooooooooooooo!!
--Darth Vader
 
Reply With Quote
Aceofone
Old 03-10-2005, 02:05 AM #5 (permalink)  
Flush

Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 497
Aceofone
Quote:
Originally Posted by whileone
As far as A is concerened, the worst that can happen is a split pot, but with a really small bet A gets a coinflip for more of B's money.
I disagree, there is very little chance that Player A put player B on JJ. therefore he could be worrying about a small 2-pair, possible set, or maybe even the flush.
Reply With Quote
whileone
Old 03-10-2005, 02:07 AM     Post subject: Re: An interesting NL problem to get you thinking... #6 (permalink)  
whileone's Avatar
Flush

Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 306
whileone
Quote:
Originally Posted by ArcticKnight
For some reason you both agree to flip your hands up pre-flop, but still play out the hand
this might make my reasoning a little more clear
Noooooooooooooooo!!
--Darth Vader
 
Reply With Quote
ArcticKnight
Old 03-10-2005, 02:08 AM #7 (permalink)  
ArcticKnight's Avatar
Flush

Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: golf course
Posts: 416
ArcticKnight
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aceofone
Depends on who is in what position.

2 possible plays.

1. Player A w/ Jc is on button, flop comes and player B bets out with his overpair, Player A will now assume that Player B Has at best TPTK because if he flopped the flush he would check to entice a bet. Player A will then Raise All in believing that he has any board pair beat and his flush outs arent dead.
Player B will be faced with the massive raise and will probably fold, not wanting to gamble his entire stack.

This could be altered depending on how long the heads up match has been going {not specified}, the earlier in the match, the more likely it is that Player B will fold.

2. Player B w/o Jc is on button, flop comes and Player A bets out with his overpair and 4-flush. Sounds similiar right? This time Player B will almost invariably make a massive raise, both will wind up allin. Then we're back to percentages.


Quote:
I believe there is only one correct answer
I don't believe there is ever ONLY 1 answer.
To many external variables that cant be controlled (e.g. moods).

You missed the part where I said they both show thier hands to each other pre-flop. Neither play has to "assume" what the other player has.
Gone golfing ..see ya in the Fall of 2006
PS. What did the snail on the turtle's back say?
Wheeeeeeeee........
 
Reply With Quote
Aceofone
Old 03-10-2005, 02:10 AM #8 (permalink)  
Flush

Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 497
Aceofone
my apologies, I missed that.

Then it is a very basic mathematical question.

~3:1 Player A wins.
~3:2 it is split

Quote:
The question is who wins the pot (or is it split), and how much is the pot when it is taken down? I believe there is only one correct answer, assuming that both players are very good and know what they are doing.
More than likely both players are allin on the flop. 2000$ pot.
Reply With Quote
dsaxton
Old 03-10-2005, 02:48 AM #9 (permalink)  
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 2,667
dsaxton
Player A = player with club
Player B = player without club

I think if you assume each player is acting rationally and anticipates rational decisions from the other, player B will check if he is first to act, and player A will move all-in if he is first or second to act. Player B will then fold in turn.

The reasoning is that player B can expect player A to move all-in to maximize his own chances of winning the pot without risking anything, and so player B minimizes his own losses by checking since he cannot sensibly risk his entire stack when the best he can do is break even.
Reply With Quote
whileone
Old 03-10-2005, 03:21 AM #10 (permalink)  
whileone's Avatar
Flush

Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 306
whileone
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsaxton
Player A = player with club
Player B = player without club

I think if you assume each player is acting rationally and anticipates rational decisions from the other, player B will check if he is first to act, and player A will move all-in if he is first or second to act. Player B will then fold in turn.

The reasoning is that player B can expect player A to move all-in to maximize his own chances of winning the pot without risking anything, and so player B minimizes his own losses by checking since he cannot sensibly risk his entire stack when the best he can do is break even.
no, the best player B can do, is win $50 bucks. Once it's in the middle, it shouldn't be counted as part of his stack. If player a bets $1, B *has* to call, because it's +EV he could win $51 for a $1 bet. he has odds for that.

It's player A's job to bet as much as B will call so if he catches the club, he can make a few extra bucks. B won't make a -EV decision, so the worst odds A can offer are 38:9. B has a share of that pot, by not calling a small enough bet, he's donating money to A's cause.
Noooooooooooooooo!!
--Darth Vader
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2005, 03:33 AM #11 (permalink)  
™'s Avatar
Straight

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: MA
Posts: 144
™
Send a message via AIM to ™
I think you guys are thinking to literally im assuming, by the way he worded his post, that this is some kind of trick question, a riddle. He even says " I believe there is only one correct answer"
Reply With Quote
ArcticKnight
Old 03-10-2005, 03:39 AM #12 (permalink)  
ArcticKnight's Avatar
Flush

Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: golf course
Posts: 416
ArcticKnight
there is no trick, just common sense
Gone golfing ..see ya in the Fall of 2006
PS. What did the snail on the turtle's back say?
Wheeeeeeeee........
 
Reply With Quote
dsaxton
Old 03-10-2005, 03:54 AM #13 (permalink)  
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 2,667
dsaxton
Quote:
Originally Posted by whileone
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsaxton
Player A = player with club
Player B = player without club

I think if you assume each player is acting rationally and anticipates rational decisions from the other, player B will check if he is first to act, and player A will move all-in if he is first or second to act. Player B will then fold in turn.

The reasoning is that player B can expect player A to move all-in to maximize his own chances of winning the pot without risking anything, and so player B minimizes his own losses by checking since he cannot sensibly risk his entire stack when the best he can do is break even.
no, the best player B can do, is win $50 bucks. Once it's in the middle, it shouldn't be counted as part of his stack. If player a bets $1, B *has* to call, because it's +EV he could win $51 for a $1 bet. he has odds for that.

It's player A's job to bet as much as B will call so if he catches the club, he can make a few extra bucks. B won't make a -EV decision, so the worst odds A can offer are 38:9. B has a share of that pot, by not calling a small enough bet, he's donating money to A's cause.
I don't think this is necessarily the better route. If he makes medium-sized bets, it is true that he allows for the possibility of winning some extra money, but he also allows his opponent the option to correctly pursue a split pot. If he moves all-in, he forces player B to give up the pot immediately, or risk his whole stack in the hopes of winning $50. There's probably at least some element of personal preference here, but I think the latter choice is better for player A.
Reply With Quote
koolmoe
Old 03-10-2005, 04:57 AM #14 (permalink)  
koolmoe's Avatar
Full House

Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Drowning in prosperity
Posts: 1,279
koolmoe
Player A wins either on the flop or the turn. It appears that Player A can make a small bet on the flop to get Player B to chase, but Player B realizes that he may never see the river since Player A can push on the turn no matter what card falls and must fold to any flop bet.

Player A could increase his variance by checking the flop and betting about 2/3 of the pot on the turn (17.5/26.5 I think). Any larger bet and Player B will fold. Any smaller bet and Player A is costing himself money.

Edit: After reflection, I think the amount Player A must bet on the turn after checking the flop is actually around twice the pot (17.5/9*P or about 194.44). This would give Player B pot odds of 26.5:17.5, which he can call with EV 0. The expectation for Player A is 100 whether B calls or folds to the bet.
Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2005, 05:19 AM #15 (permalink)  
™'s Avatar
Straight

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: MA
Posts: 144
™
Send a message via AIM to ™
"there is no trick, just common sense " AHA that proves even more that it is a riddle of some sort
Reply With Quote
Greedo017
Old 03-10-2005, 05:36 AM #16 (permalink)  
Greedo017's Avatar
Full House

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: wearing the honors of honor and whatnot
Posts: 1,461
Greedo017 is on a distinguished road
I think player A wins 100 dollars on the flop every time.

Player B knows even if player A makes a small bet that would make sense to call, A will push the turn anyway, and now B would've lost x amount extra for calling the flop because he has to fold to a turn push.

i just realized koolmoe already said this in so many words. oh well.
Reply With Quote
ArcticKnight
Old 03-10-2005, 05:47 AM #17 (permalink)  
ArcticKnight's Avatar
Flush

Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: golf course
Posts: 416
ArcticKnight
Hi

A few folks posted what I think is the only correct answer.

Player A takes down the Pot for the $100 that is already there.

Here is the reasoning. Player A can win with a flush, or he can tie if he misses the flush; Player B can only tie the hand – he cannot win.

With that in mind, there is no use trying to figure out what size bet is acceptable for player B to call post-flop (as many of you have tried to do) . The fact is Player B should fold to any post-flop bet (even $10).

Why, because if Player A hits the flush on the turn, player B loses $60 dollars (instead of $50). That is obvious. But if player A misses the flush on the turn , he will go all-in for $940 after the turn, and Player B will have to fold. Player B would be putting up $940 with around an 80% chance of getting his $60 back, and around a 20% chance of losing $940. Because Player B can never do better than getting back exactly what he put in, he must fold to a large all-in bet.

Player B has to be smart enough to know that whatever Player A bets post-flop, it’s just a trap for an all-in on the turn if he misses the flush. In short, Player B is screwed.


NOTE: If Player B is not thinking clearly, he could be sucked into a $25 or $50 bet post-flop (reasoning that he has correct odds), but not thinking ahead to the all-in that will be sure to follow.

What I wonder is how many players in Player B’s position would actually think this through, and how many would make an incorrect call post-flop.
Gone golfing ..see ya in the Fall of 2006
PS. What did the snail on the turtle's back say?
Wheeeeeeeee........
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2005, 02:21 PM #18 (permalink)  
™'s Avatar
Straight

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: MA
Posts: 144
™
Send a message via AIM to ™
ok ok fine it wasnt a trick question! I was waiting for the

PLAYER B WINS $867 FROM PLAYER A!!! WHAT WHAT WHAT!



Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2005, 02:23 PM #19 (permalink)  
™'s Avatar
Straight

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: MA
Posts: 144
™
Send a message via AIM to ™
Player B bets 867$ on the flop, Player A, being a seeing eye chimp with no knowledge of poker folds. (Of course other chimps are poker gods just not this one)
Reply With Quote
dsaxton
Old 03-10-2005, 04:13 PM #20 (permalink)  
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 2,667
dsaxton
I think if Player A waits for the turn to move all-in, he takes too much of a risk of splitting the pot. Player B may just decide to gamble and call since the pot will be split a large percentage of the time.
Reply With Quote
whileone
Old 03-10-2005, 04:19 PM #21 (permalink)  
whileone's Avatar
Flush

Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 306
whileone
i'm the only one to consider that B might call something, i'm the chump.

Just so i'm clear,
A must go all in, to protect his share of B's blind before the flop.
If A just checks to the river then B might split the pot, which is bad.
I suppose any bet by A is too scary for B to call on the flop, because there are still two cards to come, but a small bet on the turn I think is callable.
Noooooooooooooooo!!
--Darth Vader
 
Reply With Quote
vfreeman
Old 03-10-2005, 05:32 PM #22 (permalink)  

Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2
vfreeman
B cannot call under any circumstance regardless of bet size. He has nothing to win beyond what he puts in regardless of the final 2 cards.
Reply With Quote
dsaxton
Old 03-10-2005, 05:48 PM #23 (permalink)  
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 2,667
dsaxton
Quote:
Originally Posted by vfreeman
B cannot call under any circumstance regardless of bet size. He has nothing to win beyond what he puts in regardless of the final 2 cards.
Well, in a sense Player B "expects" to win a fraction of half of the pot on each street, since the pot will be split a percentage of the time. Strictly in terms of expected value, it may make sense to call, for example, a $1 bet on the flop, since the majority of the time the player will be returned much more.
Reply With Quote
TylerK
Old 03-10-2005, 07:26 PM #24 (permalink)  
TylerK's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: PEANUT BUTTER JELLY TIME
Posts: 1,791
TylerK
Send a message via AIM to TylerK
Player A goes all in and player B goes all in. Why? Because it's on party poker and man, pocket jacks....that's a pretty good hand!
TylerK: its just gambling if i want to worry about money i'll go to work lol
 
Reply With Quote
Usuyami
Old 03-10-2005, 07:44 PM #25 (permalink)  
Usuyami's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 62
Usuyami
Quote:
Originally Posted by TylerK
Player A goes all in and player B goes all in. Why? Because it's on Party Poker and man, pocket jacks....that's a pretty good hand!
LOL, and Player C called the preflop raise with 3c8s and calls the AI on the flop and hits 5c on the turn and 6c on the river to take it down. Everyone else is dumbfounded as Player C struts his stuff thinking he's gonna be the next Gus Hansen.
SnGs Played: 7

1st: 3
2nd: 0
3rd: 2
4th-10th: 2

ITM %: 71.4

Total Profit: +$660
 
Reply With Quote
Reply
Latest Poker News
Bbickes Old 06-02-2012, 08:10 PM    Merge Network 6.0 Looks to Retain Current Player Base
In an effort to perhaps keep players from moving to the new Revolution Network setup by the former Lock Poker, Merge Network has taken drastic steps to respond to their player base's requests to impro ...

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 07:07 AM.


FTR Testimonials

All content
© FlopTurnRiver.com
Advertising  |   Partners  |   Testimonials  |   T&C  |   Contact Us  |   FTR News & Press  |   Site Map  |   Search FTR

Full Tilt  |   Titan Poker  |   UltimateBet  |   Poker Stars  |   Ladbrokes Bonus  |   Sportsbook  |   Cake Poker  

Play Texas Holdem Online, Online Texas Holdem Strategy, & Poker Forum
This is not a gambling website.