|
sauce123
|
02-15-2007, 10:00 PM
Post subject: F@#$ YOU DOYLE: what you think of this squeez??
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Dizzy
Posts: 2,405
|
|
PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $1.00 BB (6 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: FlopTurnRiver)
saw flop|saw showdown
Button ($55.15)
SB ($216.80)
Hero ($102.70)
UTG ($102.60)
MP ($241.05)
CO ($100)
Preflop: Hero is BB with 2 , T .
UTG raises to $4, MP calls $4, CO calls $4, Button calls $4, 1 fold, Hero raises to $25, UTG folds, MP calls $21, CO folds, Button calls $21.
Flop: ($83.50) 9 , 3 , T (3 players)
Final Pot: $83.50
Squeeze gone WRONG
I Shove Flop... Important Info: utg runs 21/21 and seems at least rational so I dont expect him calling without AK+ QQ+, MP seems loose and generally bad, button is an unknown shorty
|
|
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
Renton
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
Posts: 5,992
|
|
checkfold flop and this is a gross spot to squeeze
|
|
|
|
bigspenda73
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Pwnsylvania
Posts: 7,546
|
|
Do you guys just get bored at the table?
|
|
|
|
Ash256
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 1,760
|
|
edited for embarassment
|
|
|
|
Warpe
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Canuckistan
Posts: 3,905
|
|
An UTG raise followed by 3 callers does not a good squeeze spot make.
|
|
|
|
bigspenda73
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Pwnsylvania
Posts: 7,546
|
|
Thanks Yoda
|
|
|
|
Warpe
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Canuckistan
Posts: 3,905
|
|
welcome, you are
|
|
|
|
IowaSkinsFan
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 7,148
|
|
LOLZ
why is everyone flaming this? this is a completely reasonable spot to squeeze.
1. Sauce, don't post results, end HH at squezze point plz.
2. It's hard for me not after the squezze to not c/f the flop even though you hit it.
Wow, I can't believe how out of line FTR has gotten at this post. Sauce123 is actually a very solid 100 and 200nl reg, and just because the guy made his first post on this forum doesn't mean he sucks.
I'd like to hear reasoning of why exactly you think anyone is going to call sauce's raise?
|
|
|
|
IowaSkinsFan
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 7,148
|
|
and what's with the FU doyle thing?
|
|
|
|
IowaSkinsFan
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 7,148
|
|
Just to make sure I'm not crazy, I talked to Lyric about the hand; here's our convo:
Redgrape20 (5:33:20 PM): how good/bad is this if UTG is raising a big range in EP and all cold callers are not super passive?
Redgrape20 (5:33:24 PM): PokerStarsNo-Limit Hold'em, $1.00 BB (6 handed) Hand History Converter Toolfrom FlopTurnRiver.com(Format: FlopTurnRiver)
saw flop|saw showdown
Button ($55.15)
SB ($216.80)
Hero ($102.70)
UTG ($102.60)
MP ($241.05)
CO ($100)
Preflop:Hero is BB with 2, T.
UTG raises to $4, MP calls $4, CO calls $4, Button calls $4, 1 fold, Hero raises to $25
Redgrape20 (5:34:22 PM): Lyric u there?
Redgrape20 (5:35:03 PM): I guess not
xxxxx(5:35:52 PM): T2o?
Redgrape20 (5:35:14 PM): T2s
xxxxx(5:35:56 PM): that's your hand?
xxxxx (5:36:00 PM): it's not that bad
Redgrape20 (5:35:19 PM): its my friends hand
Redgrape20 (5:35:29 PM): but not good?
xxxxxx (5:37:47 PM): i would choose a hand with a little more strength, but with all that dead money out there it is very enticing
xxxxxxx(5:38:00 PM): esp if they don't slowplay and you haven't been squeezing much
Redgrape20 (5:37:26 PM): k
Redgrape20 (5:37:48 PM): if you get two callers, none who were UTG or MP and the flop comes T93 rainbow do u just c/f?
xxxxxxx(5:39:12 PM): c bet half pot prolly
Redgrape20 (5:38:46 PM): and fold to a raise?
xxxxx(5:39:31 PM): but hell they are horrible if they called your Squeez
xxxxxx (5:39:32 PM): e
Redgrape20 (5:38:54 PM): lol
Redgrape20 (5:38:55 PM): k
Redgrape20 (5:39:14 PM): isn't half pot here $40 which is pretty much ur entire stack?
Redgrape20 (5:39:19 PM): are we calling a raise?
xxxxxx (5:40:27 PM): depends on those donkeys
xxxxxxx (5:40:33 PM): prolly not
Redgrape20 (5:40:06 PM): so there's just way too much FE?
Redgrape20 (5:40:08 PM): to not bet
Redgrape20 (5:41:39 PM): ?
xxxxxx: have like QT or a set
Redgrape20 (5:43:08 PM): lol k
|
|
|
|
Renton
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
Posts: 5,992
|
|
AARGGGH.
The squeeze play is so incredibly overrated. Out of 100 spots where theres a raise and one or more calls and it folds to us, probably 2 or less of those spots is an profitable spot to reraise without a hand.
In OP's hand, he's a massive favorite to get called, and he doesn't have a playable hand when called.
|
|
|
|
bigspenda73
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Pwnsylvania
Posts: 7,546
|
|
FU Dolye= 10 2
Doyle won both WSOP with 10 2
That's the FU Doyle
Do we really need to make plays like this is my question?
|
|
|
|
IowaSkinsFan
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 7,148
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bigspenda73
Do we really need to make plays like this is my question?
|
Thanks for the doyle clarification, lol can't believe i didn't get that.
I don't think the question in ring is whether we ever need to make a play, it's whether the play is +EV or not. And even if this is borderlin EV, I think we do it just for image and balancing reasons.
|
|
|
|
Renton
|
02-15-2007, 10:53 PM
Post subject: Re: F@#$ YOU DOYLE: what you think of this squeez??
|
#14 (permalink)
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
Posts: 5,992
|
|
Here's how his HH needs to look.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by sauce123
PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $1.00 BB (6 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: FlopTurnRiver)
saw flop| saw showdown
Button ($100)
SB ($216.80)
Hero ($102.70)
UTG ($102.60)
MP ($241.05)
CO ($100)
Preflop: Hero is BB with a hand a little more playable than T2s
CO raises to $4, Button calls $4, SB calls $4, Hero raises to $20
Important Info: cutoff is clearly opening a very wide range here seems at least rational so I dont expect him calling without AK+ QQ+, BTN seems loose but is capable of folding hands
|
|
|
|
|
IowaSkinsFan
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 7,148
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by IowaSkinsFan
Just to make sure I'm not crazy, I talked to Lyric about the hand; here's our convo:
Redgrape20 (5:33:20 PM): how good/bad is this if UTG is raising a big range in EP and all cold callers are not super passive?
Redgrape20 (5:33:24 PM): PokerStarsNo-Limit Hold'em, $1.00 BB (6 handed) Hand History Converter Toolfrom FlopTurnRiver.com(Format: FlopTurnRiver)
saw flop|saw showdown
Button ($55.15)
SB ($216.80)
Hero ($102.70)
UTG ($102.60)
MP ($241.05)
CO ($100)
Preflop:Hero is BB with 2, T.
UTG raises to $4, MP calls $4, CO calls $4, Button calls $4, 1 fold, Hero raises to $25
Redgrape20 (5:34:22 PM): Lyric u there?
Redgrape20 (5:35:03 PM): I guess not
xxxxx(5:35:52 PM): T2o?
Redgrape20 (5:35:14 PM): T2s
xxxxx(5:35:56 PM): that's your hand?
xxxxx (5:36:00 PM): it's not that bad
Redgrape20 (5:35:19 PM): its my friends hand
Redgrape20 (5:35:29 PM): but not good?
xxxxxx (5:37:47 PM): i would choose a hand with a little more strength, but with all that dead money out there it is very enticing
xxxxxxx(5:38:00 PM): esp if they don't slowplay and you haven't been squeezing much
Redgrape20 (5:37:26 PM): k
Redgrape20 (5:37:48 PM): if you get two callers, none who were UTG or MP and the flop comes T93 rainbow do u just c/f?
xxxxxxx(5:39:12 PM): c bet half pot prolly
Redgrape20 (5:38:46 PM): and fold to a raise?
xxxxx(5:39:31 PM): but hell they are horrible if they called your Squeez
xxxxxx (5:39:32 PM): e
Redgrape20 (5:38:54 PM): lol
Redgrape20 (5:38:55 PM): k
Redgrape20 (5:39:14 PM): isn't half pot here $40 which is pretty much ur entire stack?
Redgrape20 (5:39:19 PM): are we calling a raise?
xxxxxx (5:40:27 PM): depends on those donkeys
xxxxxxx (5:40:33 PM): prolly not
Redgrape20 (5:40:06 PM): so there's just way too much FE?
Redgrape20 (5:40:08 PM): to not bet
Redgrape20 (5:41:39 PM): ?
xxxxxx: have like QT or a set
Redgrape20 (5:43:08 PM): lol k
|
making sure everyone reads this, this is from my pro friend.
Renton, I'm not sure you have to be that sure of it, but of course that situation would be a lot more ideal.
|
|
|
|
jo
|
|
Straight
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 166
|
|
I never squeeze more than 1 cold caller, because I always figure with three people already in the pot one of them is bound to call the raise. Having said that, I thought the whole point of a squeeze was to do it with a shitty hand that has slim chance of otherwise winning. Else isn't it best to just call? I guess my question is, why is T2s not a good squeezing hand?
|
|
|
|
sauce123
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Dizzy
Posts: 2,405
|
|
hahahahha..... ok if this is getting flamed this bad I should post some where I'm REALLY out of line lol. Regardless my thought processes for the hand r as follows:
1. there is 17.50 in dead money in the pot I'm raising 25 to win that therefore it does not have to succeed often.
2. UTG runs 21/21, as someone who knows what that means i put his utg raising range as AT+ any pair, and some connectors if he feels like it
3. UTG seems to be a thinking player who is not going to call with an AQ type of hand here.
AND postflop:
1. The two callers r by FAR the worst players at the table.
2. I'm obviously pissed at getting two callers, but against these two donks, getting 2 to 1 from the pot I can't imagine folding top pair + I should have some FE here.
Keep the flames broiling plz
|
|
|
|
bigspenda73
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Pwnsylvania
Posts: 7,546
|
|
Not flaming just wanting to know how typical of a play is this?
I can understand why you picked this spot but you need to be more than 50% certain that this will take down the pot as you have very little chance in taking down the pot postflop if the 2 players are as bad as you say they are.
|
|
|
|
Renton
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
Posts: 5,992
|
|
[quote="sauce123"]1. there is 17.50 in dead money in the pot I'm raising 25 to win that therefore it does not have to succeed often./quote]
How do u figure? Sounds to me like this needs to work way over half the time for $$$.
|
|
|
|
IowaSkinsFan
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 7,148
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bigspenda73
Not flaming just wanting to know how typical of a play is this?
I can understand why you picked this spot but you need to be more than 50% certain that this will take down the pot as you have very little chance in taking down the pot postflop if the 2 players are as bad as you say they are.
|
This isn't a typical play, it's just a laggy thing to do, but that doesn't mean it's not good.
If the players behind UTG have an over 50 vpip Im not sure I raise here.
|
|
|
|
sauce123
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Dizzy
Posts: 2,405
|
|
Ok sry let me add to that a little. The bad player (MP) was running 33/12ish if i remember so hes not just some drunk guy whos calling with any two here to get lucky. Hes just bad. The btn caller was a shortstack so obviously no credit lol, also I have no idea wtf he has if he chose to coldcall on the button after all those raises, I'm gonna guess some suited connector hes waaaaaay overvaluing given his stack size or maybe AQ AJ. So basically I legitimately thought this play succeeds 60%ish of the time given the villains ranges/tendencies. The flop play was just me knowing I would be calling a push getting over 2 to 1 against these villains, and so therefore pushing myself to pick up whatever FE possible is a better play imo.
|
|
|
|
Jager
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 754
|
|
Am I the UTG here??? Anyway I think this is fine, with a read of course. Although T2s is real weak...
|
|
"It is impossible for you to learn what you think you already know."
|
|
sauce123
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Dizzy
Posts: 2,405
|
|
One last thing.
I'm running 17/14ish on the table so I have a tight image and I have never tried a squeeze before at this table.
Also one poster made a very legitimate point which was basically: sure this is a marginal spot, so why do you need to make this play?
Agreed, honestly. I made it because I wanted to and I thought it was a new play which was +ev in this situation. I posted it because its a play I make almost never and so feedback is welcome. Thanks. Sauce.
|
|
|
|
Renton
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
Posts: 5,992
|
|
i don't think u are doing better than 2:1 against the hands that are pushing this flop if u check. Hence the c/f.
|
|
|
|
sauce123
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Dizzy
Posts: 2,405
|
|
Renton,
Very true. However, I have no desire to give a free card here and I think given these villains there is a real chance I have the best hand and a legitimate chance they may fold the best hand (ok, small chance of that lol). Also I get called by any flush draw (AKs, AQs, AJs) any straight draw (QJ, 87) which I have stated I think may be a part of callers ranges.
|
|
I got more flava than fruitstripe gum
|
|
IowaSkinsFan
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 7,148
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Renton
i don't think u are doing better than 2:1 against the hands that are pushing this flop if u check. Hence the c/f.
|
that's why i bet half pot, so we dont have to be.
|
|
|
|
Ash256
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 1,760
|
|
Aight, obviously I've been corrected here, and I did go too far, and I'd like to apologise.
But still, doesn't the fact that UTG opened UTG make it pretty scary? Or am I overvaluing position in an aggressive shorthanded situation here?
I think I'm still gonna need to read some more points from IowaSkinsFan before I'm positive that this HH isn't an example of someone outplaying themselves and owning themselves in the process though. 
To be perfectly honest, I think what mainly made me go "wtf this is crazy" is that it was T2. I have seen many a fish think T2 is the nuts cause it's a "lucky" hand many a time, and it instantly reminded me of that.
Hell, do this with 54 and I prolly wouldn't have said shit. :P
|
|
|
|
IowaSkinsFan
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 7,148
|
|
Read the chat I posted.
Also he stated UTG range was big, and the fact that he's raising an UTG player indicates a lot of strength.
|
|
|
|
swiggidy
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Waiting in the shadows ...
Posts: 3,777
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by IowaSkinsFan
Read the chat I posted.
Also he stated UTG range was big, and the fact that he's raising an UTG player indicates a lot of strength.
|
Is UTG 21/21 from UTG, or 21/21 at the table? Big huge massive difference.
I appreciate your pros thoughts but he is heavily leaning on "if they're not bad this is good", but what if they're bad!?!?
|
|
(\__/)
(='.'=)
(")_(")
|
|
Lukie
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: back with a vengeance
Posts: 3,307
|
|
I think its a bit spewy, but I don't think the squeeze is quite as bad as people are saying if you have a nitty image. That said, these SPECIFIC table dynamics that I gather from a few posts make it pretty bad imo.
very easy flop shove imo, the pot is massive and we have an incredibly vulnerable top pair that's probably good more often then people think, we have a good 20% equity against a lot of the hands that we're behind, and we probably have a bit of FE against the player directly behind us.
|
|
|
|
elipsesjeff
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 4,900
|
|
wheeee
|
Check out my videos at Grinderschool.com
More Full Ring NLHE Cash videos than ANY other poker training site. Training starts at $10/month.
|
|
Miffed22001
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Marry Me Cheryl!!!
Posts: 8,181
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lukie
I think its a bit spewy, but I don't think the squeeze is quite as bad as people are saying if you have a nitty image. That said, these SPECIFIC table dynamics that I gather from a few posts make it pretty bad imo.
very easy flop shove imo, the pot is massive and we have an incredibly vulnerable top pair that's probably good more often then people think, we have a good 20% equity against a lot of the hands that we're behind, and we probably have a bit of FE against the player directly behind us.
|
im going with this. It isnt great but not awful
My only question is how many 30/1x donks are stacking off with tp/mk here like QTs ATs and all that shyte we know they call large reraises with.
|
|
|
|
Renton
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
Posts: 5,992
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by IowaSkinsFan
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Renton
i don't think u are doing better than 2:1 against the hands that are pushing this flop if u check. Hence the c/f.
|
that's why i bet half pot, so we dont have to be.
|
Purposely making an ev mistake in betting just so you'll have odds to call a push is pretty dumb imo.
|
|
|
|
bigspenda73
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Pwnsylvania
Posts: 7,546
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Renton
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by IowaSkinsFan
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Renton
i don't think u are doing better than 2:1 against the hands that are pushing this flop if u check. Hence the c/f.
|
that's why i bet half pot, so we dont have to be.
|
Purposely making an ev mistake in betting just so you'll have odds to call a push is pretty dumb imo.
|
Exactly what I thought when I read it. This would be compounding errors IMO.
|
|
|
|
Miffed22001
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Marry Me Cheryl!!!
Posts: 8,181
|
|
my question would be why do this when this stars game is pretty easy to beat anyway without playing wildly?
|
|
|
|
jackvance
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,910
|
|
i love this thread.
|
|
Sarcasm is your body's natural defense against stupidity
|
|
sauce123
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Dizzy
Posts: 2,405
|
|
Yea great point with the "you dont have to do this--- this is ssnl attitude" you guys r obviously 100% right and I dont I just thought it was a slim +ev play I wanted to experiment with.
Results: MP called with AKdd btn folded, MP spiked a Kh on turn and won.
Results: +EV HOLLA!! (and yes thats completely results oriented I may think the play is slightly +ev but given all this discussion its def close and could be -ev)
Good discussion thanks, peace, sauce.
|
|
I got more flava than fruitstripe gum
|
|
mcatdog
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 3,654
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bigspenda73
Do you guys just get bored at the table?
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jyms
 Ahem....
|
agree with both of these guys, the OP is a noob with no discipline and he'll never accomplish anything in poker
|
|
|
|
bode
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: May 2006
Location: slow motion
Posts: 4,270
|
|
awesome
|
Quote:
|
eeevees are not monies yet...they are like baby monies.
|
|
|
badgers
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Spewing
Posts: 3,372
|
|
wow this is my favorite bump ever. Sauce really burst onto ftr!
|
3k post - Return of the blog!
|
|
dalecooper
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,107
|
|
Classic bump, ty
|
|
|
|
Galapogos
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: The Loser's Lounge
Posts: 2,323
|
|
Lol, I came in here to bump this because of the recent commune post about his MTT win. Crazy how he was a mere 100NL reg little over a year ago.
|

Quote:
|
Originally Posted by sauce123
I don't get why you insist on stacking off with like jack high all the time.
|
|
|
Warpe
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Canuckistan
Posts: 3,905
|
|
lol
|
|
|
|
will641
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: getting my swell on
Posts: 1,610
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mcatdog
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bigspenda73
Do you guys just get bored at the table?
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jyms
 Ahem....
|
agree with both of these guys, the OP is a noob with no discipline and he'll never accomplish anything in poker
|
obv.
seriously though its just amazing that he was playing 100nl a little over a year ago.
|
|
Cash Rules Everything Around Me.
|
|
EzDuzIt
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Green Bay
Posts: 915
|
|
lol wow.
whatever happened to this fish anyways?
|
|
|
|
Deanglow
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: lol
Posts: 2,443
|
|
Wow sauce joined the same month as me. I wish I'd made as much progress.
|
|
|
|
badgers
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Spewing
Posts: 3,372
|
|
haha ditto I've just noticed
|
3k post - Return of the blog!
|
|
Dislexsik
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: On the grind
Posts: 832
|
|
MEGABUMP!
|
|
|
|
xptboy
|
|
Straight
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Brussels
Posts: 187
|
|
hey sauce, congrats on becoming a coach at leggopoker btw
|
|
|
|
IowaSkinsFan
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 7,148
|
|
lol didnt read this thread on first bump. Looking back I think the squeeze is fine we should just c/f the flop and win when he has KQ/AQ/AK, lose when he doesnt.
|
|
|