|
microgrinder
|
03-19-2008, 06:37 AM
Post subject: Call with T high on river? 25NL LOL.
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
3-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 101
|
|
Maybe I've gone insane, but I really want to call here. Site doesn't have HUD, villain is definitely passive. I'd guess somewhere around 30-35/10 or something. He's doubtful to be betting for value with anything but a boat, given history.
Also whats the worst hand you call with?
$0.1/$0.25 No Limit Holdem
3 players
Converted at weaktight.com
Stacks:
BTN ($22.60)
SB ($9.19)
Hero ($34.27)
Pre-flop: ($0.35, 3 players) Hero is BB :Ts:
BTN calls $0.25, 1 fold, Hero raises to $1.35, BTN calls $1.1
Flop: ($2.8, 2 players)
Hero bets $2.3, BTN calls $2.3
Turn: ($7.4, 2 players)
Hero checks, BTN checks
River: ($7.4, 2 players)
Hero checks, BTN bets $4
Hero is considering calling?
|
|
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
Jack Sawyer
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Old School
Posts: 2,535
|
|
nobody will ever bluff you again
|
My dream... is to fly... over the rainbow... so high...

Quote:
|
VHS is like a book and a book is like a stack of kindles.
|
Hey, I'm in a movie!
http://youtu.be/lGdnIrRKDTI
|
|
UG
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,855
|
|
given reads quick fold awe-shucks next hand?
|
|
|
|
dalecooper
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,107
|
|
I let that go without a thought. Even if he's bluffing there's too good of a chance that he'll beat you by accident.
|
|
|
|
microgrinder
|
|
3-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 101
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dalecooper
Even if he's bluffing there's too good of a chance that he'll beat you by accident.
|
I don't think this happens very often, as he is just happy to see a showdown with the hands that beat me that aren't a boat.
|
|
|
|
EzDuzIt
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Green Bay
Posts: 915
|
|
probably let it go. i guess u beat counterfeited pps
|
|
|
|
dalecooper
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,107
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by microgrinder
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dalecooper
Even if he's bluffing there's too good of a chance that he'll beat you by accident.
|
I don't think this happens very often, as he is just happy to see a showdown with the hands that beat me that aren't a boat.
|
Depending how aware he is he might not realize that king high/queen high is a reasonable holding here and thinks he's bluffing when he's actually making something closer to a very thin (and weird) value bet; or he might just be making a very thin (and weird) value bet. Regardless, I'm not usually bothering with this. There are a lot of better spots for looking people up. This is the kind of call you make to bolster your table image as much as to make money, and does your table image really matter to this guy, or anyone else who's sitting with you? Probably not.
But if you were playing Phil Ivey, I'd say this is worth the call. It might get him off your ass for 3 or 4 hands, and would also be an awesome story to tell your friends.
|
|
|
|
Ash256
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 1,760
|
|
You're not completely insane you know dude.
|
|
|
|
kmind
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Not Giving In
Posts: 4,240
|
|
I probably fold. If he bets a suspicious amount I probably call.
|
|
|
|
martindcx1e
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,614
|
|
without reading the hand fold
|
|
Wikipedia is the best thing ever. Anyone in the world can write anything they want about any subject. So you know you are getting the best possible information.
|
|
dev
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: swonging and swonging
Posts: 1,550
|
|
You don't even beat a bluff most of the time.
I pokerstoved you vs. top 50% of all hands:
Board: Ad 3c As Jh Jc
Dead:
equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 18.769% 15.16% 03.61% 67 15.94 { Ts9s }
Hand 1: 81.231% 77.62% 03.61% 343 15.94 { 33+, A2s+, K2s+, Q2s+, J4s+, T6s+, 96s+, 86s+, 76s, 65s, A2o+, K5o+, Q7o+, J7o+, T7o+, 98o }
|
Check out my self-deprecation here!
|
|
Numbr2intheWorld
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,561
|
|
call and it's probably not close.
|
|
|
|
IowaSkinsFan
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 7,148
|
|
yeah i agree i call too.
|
|
|
|
Numbr2intheWorld
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,561
|
|
this guy has a counterfeited pair sooooooooooooooooooooo much.
if i had like 87 i might lead like $2.50 on the river.
|
|
|
|
nutsinho
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: flattin ur 4bets, makin u tilt
Posts: 3,280
|
|
why arent you guys adjusting his range to hands he actually calls flop with. this includes pairs and aces, not shit like KT or Q9. he never has jj+ so he nearly always either has an ace or a worse hand than yours. snapcall
|
|
My bankroll is the amount of money I would spend or lose before I got a job. It is calculated by adding my net worth to whatever I can borrow.
|
|
microgrinder
|
|
3-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 101
|
|
Aside from being a good image play with how I play, I truly think this is marginally +eV given that we only have to be right like 25% of the time. I think it's at least close.
Like what would you guys do with KK here? I really think KK is only a marginally better than T-high in this spot. Cause I there's so many reasons against him showing down K or Q high in this hand.
Edit: posted this before all the call posts came in. Good to see I'm not on crack lol.
|
|
|
|
Genitruc
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,463
|
|
r u on crack?
|
|
when the vpip's are high and the value bets are like razors, who can be safe?
|
|
pocketfours
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Lighting sweet moneys on fire.
Posts: 2,166
|
|
Call
|
|
|
|
microgrinder
|
|
3-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 101
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Genitruc
r u on crack?
|
Crack? No. Drunk...maybe (it was just St. Patrick's day)
Anywho, I tanked and called, villain showed 88. Maybe I was overthinking things and this is an easier call than what I made it out to be.
On re-evaluation I think I lead river for 1/3->1/2 pot if I have like worse than 7 or 8 high and C/C if I have like better than 8 or 9 high versus this opponent.
|
|
|
|
kmind
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Not Giving In
Posts: 4,240
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dev
You don't even beat a bluff most of the time.
I pokerstoved you vs. top 50% of all hands:
Board: Ad 3c As Jh Jc
Dead:
equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 18.769% 15.16% 03.61% 67 15.94 { Ts9s }
Hand 1: 81.231% 77.62% 03.61% 343 15.94 { 33+, A2s+, K2s+, Q2s+, J4s+, T6s+, 96s+, 86s+, 76s, 65s, A2o+, K5o+, Q7o+, J7o+, T7o+, 98o }
|
this range is completely worthless here
|
|
|
|
dev
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: swonging and swonging
Posts: 1,550
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by kmind
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dev
You don't even beat a bluff most of the time.
I pokerstoved you vs. top 50% of all hands:
Board: Ad 3c As Jh Jc
Dead:
equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 18.769% 15.16% 03.61% 67 15.94 { Ts9s }
Hand 1: 81.231% 77.62% 03.61% 343 15.94 { 33+, A2s+, K2s+, Q2s+, J4s+, T6s+, 96s+, 86s+, 76s, 65s, A2o+, K5o+, Q7o+, J7o+, T7o+, 98o }
|
this range is completely worthless here
|
Relax, I was just illustrating a point in the simplest possible way.
I don't know why I didn't think about this earlier, but I've flat called a J-high board when I played the board and watched a guy muck his hand without seeing mine. But that time I had a ridiculously good physical read. Online this is just insane.
|
Check out my self-deprecation here!
|
|
nutsinho
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: flattin ur 4bets, makin u tilt
Posts: 3,280
|
|
this guy prob would have valuetowned me if i had 7 high. lol
|
|
My bankroll is the amount of money I would spend or lose before I got a job. It is calculated by adding my net worth to whatever I can borrow.
|
|
microgrinder
|
|
3-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 101
|
|
Quote:
|
this guy prob would have valuetowned me if i had 7 high. lol
|
That would be absolutely hilarious. I think its probably more optimal to lead river for a small bet with 7 high or worse.
In hindsight I don't think this is all that close with at least 9 high+ anymore. C/C seems >> anything else the more I think about it.
|
|
|
|
microgrinder
|
|
3-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 101
|
|
double post.
|
|
|
|
Deanglow
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: lol
Posts: 2,443
|
|
For all of you that say you would snapcall, please post a hand similar where you actually did.
|
|
|
|
IowaSkinsFan
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 7,148
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Deanglow
For all of you that say you would snapcall, please post a hand similar where you actually did.
|
This is a horrible call but hey i did it.
PokerStars Game #14779283469: Hold'em No Limit ($2/$4) - 2008/01/23 - 22:56:18 (ET)
Table 'Lyalya' 2-max Seat #1 is the button
Seat 1: heybude ($423.50 in chips)
Seat 2: snowbank ($1061.50 in chips)
heybude: posts small blind $2
snowbank: posts big blind $4
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to heybude [4c 7s]
heybude: raises $8 to $12
snowbank: calls $8
*** FLOP *** [3h 2c Ks]
snowbank: bets $15
heybude: raises $37 to $52
heybude said, "call"
heybude said, "shove"
snowbank: raises $997.50 to $1049.50 and is all-in
heybude said, "haha"
heybude: calls $359.50 and is all-in
*** TURN *** [3h 2c Ks] [5s]
*** RIVER *** [3h 2c Ks 5s] [5c]
*** SHOW DOWN ***
snowbank: shows [5d 4d] (three of a kind, Fives)
heybude: mucks hand
snowbank collected $846.50 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $847 | Rake $0.50
Board [3h 2c Ks 5s 5c]
Seat 1: heybude (button) (small blind) mucked [4c 7s]
Seat 2: snowbank (big blind) showed [5d 4d] and won ($846.50) with three of a kind, Fives
|
|
|
|
nutsinho
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: flattin ur 4bets, makin u tilt
Posts: 3,280
|
|
looool so frustrating
|
|
My bankroll is the amount of money I would spend or lose before I got a job. It is calculated by adding my net worth to whatever I can borrow.
|
|
Numbr2intheWorld
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,561
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Deanglow
For all of you that say you would snapcall, please post a hand similar where you actually did.
|
This hand doesn't come up often... it'd take me forever to find one. If it comes up sometime soon I'll make sure to post it.
I've probably never done it with T high either (i think in the moment in micro's situation i'd lead bluff the river). Definitely have done it in a similar situation with Q or K high though.
|
|
|
|
griffey24
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Toronto'ish
Posts: 4,611
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Massimo
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Deanglow
For all of you that say you would snapcall, please post a hand similar where you actually did.
|
This hand doesn't come up often... it'd take me forever to find one. If it comes up sometime soon I'll make sure to post it.
I've probably never done it with T high either (i think in the moment in micro's situation i'd lead bluff the river). Definitely have done it in a similar situation with Q or K high though.
|
I agree that I'd end up lead bluffing waay waay more often than checking wtih the intention of calling with T-high. I'm not saying lead bluffing is better, but I feel more comfortable b/f than c/c with this kind of hand.
|
|
|
|
Numbr2intheWorld
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,561
|
|
yeah even though c/c is way better
|
|
|
|
Genitruc
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,463
|
|
ISF that hand just made my day
ty
|
|
when the vpip's are high and the value bets are like razors, who can be safe?
|
|
pocketfours
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Lighting sweet moneys on fire.
Posts: 2,166
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by IowaSkinsFan
This is a horrible call but hey i did it.
|
|
|
|