|
euphoricism
|
11-30-2006, 07:48 PM
Post subject: Anyone want to work some shortstack theory with me?
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Your place or my place
Posts: 3,610
|
|
My biggest problem with shortstack poker is playing shortstacked against a reraise.
Heres an example
Say I raise with 66 from MP and I 4x it and make it $1. Villain makes it $3. I'm dead in the water, because I have to call $2 into a $4 pot with what would be only $7ish behind on the flop. So I clearly have to fold or push. And pushing is mildly suicidal.
Now if I'm only going to hit a flop 1:8ish, and figure I get reraised 1 out of every 6x I raise a pocket pair and hence have to fold, don't pocket pairs become immediately unplayable for a raise preflop?
Should I *gasp* consider limping?
|
|
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
Warpe
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Canuckistan
Posts: 3,905
|
|
Limp/calling a 4x raise just barely leaves you enough implied odds to play for set value but, yes, I'd say it's better than raising playing with <50BB. I'd still raise from the CO/BTN though.
|
|
|
|
elipsesjeff
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 4,900
|
|
limping aint bad. Neither is pushing.
|
Check out my videos at Grinderschool.com
More Full Ring NLHE Cash videos than ANY other poker training site. Training starts at $10/month.
|
|
Fnord
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,336
|
|
Just limp 22-66 on a short stack.
|
|
|
|
Lukie
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: back with a vengeance
Posts: 3,307
|
|
you should frequently fold 22-66 on a shortstack, and if there's a raise in front then it seems fairly standard.
|
|
|