|
Galapogos
|
12-01-2007, 11:15 PM
Post subject: Another river spot
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: The Loser's Lounge
Posts: 2,323
|
|
TEXAS_HOLDEM, NO_LIMIT, P4-55029224-867
played at "Bielefeld" for USD RM from 2007-12-01 17:54 until 2007-12-01 17:55
Seat 1: Huszi25 ($311.90 in chips)
Seat 2: Galapogos [ T ,T ] ($109.85 in chips)
Seat 3: coco_f84 ($133.35 in chips)
Seat 4: Mantana11 ($99.50 in chips)
Seat 5: LeFooFurieux ($201.50 in chips)
Antes/Blinds
coco_f84 posts blind ($0.50), Mantana11 posts blind ($1).
Pre-Flop
LeFooFurieux folds, Huszi25 folds, Galapogos bets $4, coco_f84 calls $3.50, Mantana11 folds.
Flop [board cards: 2 ,2 ,2 ]
coco_f84 checks, Galapogos bets $5, coco_f84 calls $5.
Turn [board cards: 2 ,2 ,2 ,9 ]
coco_f84 bets $12, Galapogos calls $12.
River [board cards: 2 ,2 ,2 ,9 ,8 ]
coco_f84 checks, Galapogos bets $24, coco_f84 bets $60, Galapogos calls $36.
We aren't folding this to a complete unknown are we?
|

Quote:
|
Originally Posted by sauce123
I don't get why you insist on stacking off with like jack high all the time.
|
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
JL
|
12-02-2007, 04:53 AM
Post subject: Re: Another river spot
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,095
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Galapogos
We aren't folding this to a complete unknown are we?
|
I'm not.
On this site, I consider complete unknowns to be donkeys, until proven otherwise.
|
|
|
|
Kits
|
|
Straight
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 129
|
|
I couldn't fold this.
|
|
|
|
EzDuzIt
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Green Bay
Posts: 915
|
|
bet all streets harder.
anybody think we should shove over as played?
|
|
|
|
Galapogos
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: The Loser's Lounge
Posts: 2,323
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by EzDuzIt
bet all streets harder.
anybody think we should shove over as played?
|
What do you put an unknown on that we not only beat but also pays us off if we play the hand much harder?
I think shoving back over on the river is bad but I'd be interested if others think there's merit to it.
|

Quote:
|
Originally Posted by sauce123
I don't get why you insist on stacking off with like jack high all the time.
|
|
|
EzDuzIt
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Green Bay
Posts: 915
|
|
well people dont fold full houses. so unless he has a 2 here... i would think that an pair higher than yours would play this way differently if he has an 8 or 9 he is probably calling and he could easily have like an a8 a9 kind of hand here. and you never know 55 66 77 might make a bad call too.
|
|
|
|
Galapogos
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: The Loser's Lounge
Posts: 2,323
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by EzDuzIt
well people dont fold full houses.
|
That's true, but I think even a donk could figure out relative hand strengths here.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by EzDuzIt
i would think that an pair higher than yours would play this way differently if he has an 8 or 9 he is probably calling and he could easily have like an a8 a9 kind of hand here. and you never know 55 66 77 might make a bad call too.
|
Normally I would think a pair higher than mine would play it different as well, but I don't like to give an unknown credit for 3-betting JJ-QQ because they just as often flat call with it. I also think A9 could be possible, I really doubt A8 plays this way though. And I don't think you ever see 55-77 turning their hand into a bluff on the river here. And the times they make a bad call on the river, are way less than the times we are beat.
BTW, I'm not rejecting your input, I appreciate it; just debating it to hear the reasoning behind it.
Anyway, he had 62o of course, but I was mostly expecting to see A9, 99, JJ-QQ when I called.
|

Quote:
|
Originally Posted by sauce123
I don't get why you insist on stacking off with like jack high all the time.
|
|