|
Jager
|
04-14-2007, 11:32 PM
Post subject: 400nl+ Question
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 754
|
|
What are the main differences I can reasonably expect when I move up from 200nl on Stars??
Sorry about the low content...
|
|
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
IowaSkinsFan
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 7,148
|
|
From my experience playing some 400nl...
1. table selection is a lot worse, you pretty much have to play at some tables with 2-3 regs.
2. There are still bad regs.
3. There are better thinking regs who will probably pwn you initially until you figure out how to play the game unlike how you played it at 200nl.
But obviously other than that idk what else to say.
|
|
|
|
sauce123
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Dizzy
Posts: 2,405
|
|
1. ur lines need to make sense
2. ppl will 3bet and squeeze about 300% more than 200nl and it will annoy and confuse u at first. (they probably do it more than is even optimal)
3. less fish, less nitty regs, game selection may be important depending on ur winrate at lower stakes.
Again, Im more than happy to comment on any of the 400nl regs I have played with so aim me or pm me or somethin.
|
|
I got more flava than fruitstripe gum
|
|
Renton
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
Posts: 5,992
|
|
i found teh 2/4 stars game to be significanly easier than 1/2
|
|
|
|
Jager
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 754
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Renton
i found teh 2/4 stars game to be significanly easier than 1/2
|
Any points as to why that you would care to elaborate on??
|
|
|
|
Renton
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
Posts: 5,992
|
|
people are more aware than at 1/2, but only aware enough to be dangerous to them selves.
e.g. they run timeless tag lines that are obvious, which enable you to call/fold or bluff appropriately.
Plus they always give me less credit than they should.
|
|
|
|
sauce123
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Dizzy
Posts: 2,405
|
|
thats not true at all 2/4 is much, much harder
|
|
I got more flava than fruitstripe gum
|
|
Alexos
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Montreal
Posts: 2,766
|
|
I played a full session at 2/4 today at Stars, and I must say the games are tough as hell. I usually play on FT and idk it just seems like the players are much better on Stars. The squeezes were meh, same like FT, but one thing I noticed was the LAGGs that float you every single hand, something I never saw at Tilt.
Dunno, maybe it was because I know none of the regs there, and my tables were filled with regs, but in general it seems way tougher.
On the other hand 200nl on Stars is fishier imo
|
|
Nine to five is how to survive - I ain't trying to survive / I'm trying to live it to the limit and love it a lot //
Can offer RB deals on most sites, PM me.
|
English
Deutsch
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Pусский
Svenska
06-02-2012, 08:10 PM Merge Network 6.0 Looks to Retain Current Player Base
Linear Mode
