|
will641
|
11-29-2007, 09:58 PM
Post subject: 4 tabling vs. 8 or 9 tabling
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: getting my swell on
Posts: 1,610
|
|
I have started to experiment with playing less tables like 3-4, because I am realizing now that I have been taking a bigger bite than I could chew, and thus resulting in lots of monies lost. I have only played about 1k hands, but it just feels much better. One drawback though is trying to maintain vip status. I mean, they have no rakeback, so how am I supposed to make up for that playing on stars?
|
|
Cash Rules Everything Around Me.
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
bigspenda73
|
|
11-29-2007, 10:03 PM
Post subject: Re: 4 tabling vs. 8 or 9 tabling
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Pwnsylvania
Posts: 7,546
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by will641
One drawback though is trying to maintain vip status. I mean, they have no rakeback, so how am I supposed to make up for that playing on stars? |
carry a positive winrate?
|
|
|
|
will641
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: getting my swell on
Posts: 1,610
|
|
it doesnt matter, because i am still missing out on a lot of fpps and consequently cool shit and money.
|
|
Cash Rules Everything Around Me.
|
|
noble007
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: London
Posts: 531
|
|
Are you trying to maintain platinum?
What stakes do you play? I 8 table 50Nl & its enough to get that status.
I heard it works out as +- 17% rakeback if you go for the $650 50 000 points bonus - haven't worked it out.
I was also thinking of dropping down to 4 cuz im running around 2bb/100, but then sometimes I think I get a case of fancy play syndrome when I think I have reads but just playing more ABC is often the way to go hence 8/4 tables wont effect my play too much.
|
|
|
|
silu73
|
|
Full House
Join Date: May 2006
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 1,009
|
|
I am always surprised that so many people can profitably multi-table SH games. I 3-table 5-max which works fine and I don’t get too distracted by outside sources. I have 4-tabled 6-max and I have timed out too often for my likening.
Maybe I am old or maybe a lot of my plays are read dependent. Either or I like playing fewer tables and be less reliant on a HUD.
|
|
|
|
will641
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: getting my swell on
Posts: 1,610
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by noble007
I was also thinking of dropping down to 4 cuz im running around 2bb/100, but then sometimes I think I get a case of fancy play syndrome when I think I have reads but just playing more ABC is often the way to go hence 8/4 tables wont effect my play too much.
|
welcome to my world. i am playing 100 nl, but recently i was 8 tabling 50 Nl, and i just moved up. i jsut got platinum for the first time, and it took me about 28 k hands of 50 and 100 NL.
|
|
Cash Rules Everything Around Me.
|
|
IowaSkinsFan
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 7,148
|
|
lol the fpp program is so addictive
|
|
|
|
will641
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: getting my swell on
Posts: 1,610
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by IowaSkinsFan
lol the fpp program is so addictive
|
yeah it is. its kind of like one of those video games that there is jsut so much to do that its impossible to complete it.
|
|
Cash Rules Everything Around Me.
|
English
Deutsch
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Pусский
Svenska
06-02-2012, 08:10 PM Merge Network 6.0 Looks to Retain Current Player Base
Linear Mode
