|
frosst
|
03-25-2009, 08:15 PM
Post subject: 200nl TT vs unknown
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Straight
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: count-n mah monies stewie-style
Posts: 220
|
|
PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $2.00 BB (6 handed) - Poker-Stars Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com
have no stats on villian. my image is laggy as i've been involved in 3 of the last 4 hands before this one, and 2 involved me pushing ai.
CO ($239.87)
Button ($466)
SB ($315)
BB ($269.44)
Hero (UTG) ($322)
MP ($246.15)
Preflop: Hero is UTG with 10 , 10
Hero bets $8, 1 fold, CO calls $8, Button calls $8, SB calls $7, 1 fold
Flop: ($34) 6, 8 , 2 (4 players)
SB checks, Hero bets $25, 1 fold, Button calls $25, 1 fold
Turn: ($84) 6 (2 players)
Hero bets $50, Button calls $50
River: ($184) 9 (2 players)
Hero?
Total pot: $184 | Rake: $3
|
|
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
IowaSkinsFan
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 7,148
|
|
Its real close, I think prob bet like 80 and fold to shove. C/f seems just as good.
|
|
|
|
Fnord
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,336
|
|
I check and sometimes call here.
|
|
|
|
Irisheyes
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: over there
Posts: 3,708
|
|
I'm either betting to try to get value from 79/8x or else c/c because of all the draws. idk why ISF says c/f?
|
|
|
|
Luke999
|
|
Straight
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: England
Posts: 238
|
|
I'd bet/fold.
|
|
|
|
griffey24
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Toronto'ish
Posts: 4,611
|
|
I'd prob go 100/fold and my action after a check probably mostly depends on the timing of the hand.. and whether or not I put him on a draw.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jay-Z
I'm a couple hands down and I'm tryin' to get back
I gave the other grip, I lost a flip for five stacks
|
|
|
minSim
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Deventer
Posts: 1,512
|
|
Q: Does it make sense that if you're not willing to c/c say a 2/3+ PSB, you b/f like 100-? (it's basically just a blocking bet I guess)
|
|
|
|
ATOTHEC101
|
|
Full House
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,248
|
|
I'd check and just try to soulread river folding most of the time if he fires a decent bet, he'll check back all his weaker made hands like 8x,97, whilst he'll be checking or betting smallish with jj-qq. So if he bets big his range is preety polarised to trips/boats or missed f draws, and the average player will just give up here alot of the time if he bricks.
I guess bet/folding like 60-80 isn't bad but I'd usually check/reeval most of the time.
|
|
|
|
jimmy44
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Place where I can spew
Posts: 1,391
|
|
If our image was TAG, then b/f would be OK. But our image is laggy, so a 3barril from us on this paired board can be seen as trying to make villain fold ...
|
|
|
|
surviva316
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Confusing people with my liberal biblicisms
Posts: 1,625
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jimmy44
If our image was TAG, then b/f would be OK. But our image is laggy, so a 3barril from us on this paired board can be seen as trying to make villain fold ...
|
doesn't that make betting an even better option then cause he's calling with bluff catchers?
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BooG690
I just wanted to share singing vaginas.  |
|
|
griffey24
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Toronto'ish
Posts: 4,611
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by minSim
Q: Does it make sense that if you're not willing to c/c say a 2/3+ PSB, you b/f like 100-? (it's basically just a blocking bet I guess)
|
It makes sense if someone's calling range on a board is much wider than their value betting + bluffing range.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jay-Z
I'm a couple hands down and I'm tryin' to get back
I gave the other grip, I lost a flip for five stacks
|
|
|
bode
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: May 2006
Location: slow motion
Posts: 4,270
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by surviva316
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jimmy44
If our image was TAG, then b/f would be OK. But our image is laggy, so a 3barril from us on this paired board can be seen as trying to make villain fold ...
|
doesn't that make betting an even better option then cause he's calling with bluff catchers? |
yes, which is why i like b/f $100 way more than c/c or c/f.
|
Quote:
|
eeevees are not monies yet...they are like baby monies.
|
|
|
surviva316
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Confusing people with my liberal biblicisms
Posts: 1,625
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bode
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by surviva316
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jimmy44
If our image was TAG, then b/f would be OK. But our image is laggy, so a 3barril from us on this paired board can be seen as trying to make villain fold ...
|
doesn't that make betting an even better option then cause he's calling with bluff catchers? |
yes, which is why i like b/f $100 way more than c/c or c/f. |
oh...i agree. i misread the post as an argument AGAINST b/f'ing
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BooG690
I just wanted to share singing vaginas. |
|
|
riverturnflop
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 18
|
|
what's wrong with check-call? i rarely bet on this river.
|
|
|
English
Deutsch
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Pусский
Svenska
06-02-2012, 08:10 PM Merge Network 6.0 Looks to Retain Current Player Base
Linear Mode
