|
d0zer
|
04-09-2009, 02:52 PM
Post subject: 200NL: KK and an apparent donk
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,530
|
|
villain 91/66 over 12 hands
$1/$2 No Limit Holdem
6 players
Converted at weaktight.com
Stacks:
UTG gamesman09 ($177.10)
UTG+1 Phwap ($200.00)
CO GunTucker45 ($159.75)
BTN GeniusEC ($200.00)
SB mjrnt ($221.70)
BB Hero ($348.75)
Pre-flop: ($3, 6 players) Hero is BB
gamesman09 raises to $8, 4 folds, Hero raises to $24, gamesman09 calls $16
Flop: ($49, 2 players)
Hero bets $26, gamesman09 calls $26
Turn: ($101, 2 players) Hero...checks?
Was talking this hand over with some tosser last night, and the tosser was saying this villain's range is too weak to handle two barrels, so a check is good here. Conventional wisdom is zomg overpair + donk = keep betting till the money's in the middle, but his range is very weak so maybe we should be checking to induce, or to get more value from his underpairs on the river.
That being said, I really wanted to play for stacks here and felt like I had to bet the turn to setup a river shove that wasn't an overshove, also I didn't really know anything about how v played postflop -- if inducing was even worthwhile. I think we've all seen bad donks call three streets with underpairs in worse spots than this, but maybe that frequency isn't high enough for all 3?
Is this all just a whole lot of overthinking of a standard spot?
|
|
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
griffey24
|
04-09-2009, 03:31 PM
Post subject: Re: 200NL: KK and an apparent donk
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Toronto'ish
Posts: 4,611
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by d0zer
Is this all just a whole lot of overthinking of a standard spot?
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by d0zer
villain 91/66 over 12 hands
|
Not double barelling here is pretty ridiculous vs this villain. For one thing, these donks aren't ever folding anything (any pair) here so I don't see why we wouldn't bet bet bet.
Another thing is that this type of villain is prob the MOST likely to peel preflop AND flop with any Ax type hand and now has an insider that he'll never fold.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jay-Z
I'm a couple hands down and I'm tryin' to get back
I gave the other grip, I lost a flip for five stacks
|
|
|
Alexos
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Montreal
Posts: 2,766
|
|
And conventional wisdom prevails... BET!
|
|
Nine to five is how to survive - I ain't trying to survive / I'm trying to live it to the limit and love it a lot //
Can offer RB deals on most sites, PM me.
|
|
TheLeakyFaucet
|
|
3-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 54
|
|
yeah no reason to get fancy at all here... really std bet/jam riv
|
|
|
|
ATOTHEC101
|
|
Full House
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,248
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Alexos
And conventional wisdom prevails... BET!
|
lol this, you should also increase your 3 bet size oop, i generally make it 4x pfr, but $28 seems good here, only a little thing but meh.
edit: scrap 28, hes probably gonna call a bigger 3 bet looking at his early stats, make it $32+
|
|
"This sure beats Super Mario Bros.!" is my ejaculation catch phrase.
|
|
bode
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: May 2006
Location: slow motion
Posts: 4,270
|
|
yeah 3bet's kind of small OOP, but bet/bet/bet should be standard here for sure.
|
Quote:
|
eeevees are not monies yet...they are like baby monies.
|
|
|
JL
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,096
|
|
$30 preflop
$50 on the flop
Shove turn
These guys just don't ever fold the flop when they catch any piece of it.
|
|
|
|
bigspenda73
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Pwnsylvania
Posts: 7,547
|
|
i like the sizing, something like $44 on the turn and get the rest in on the river
|
|
|
|
mcatdog
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 3,654
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bigspenda73
i like the sizing, something like $44 on the turn and get the rest in on the river
|
Nah I think 1/2 pot on the flop is perfect but I'd go bigger preflop. Just think about how rarely someone has to be folding preflop in order to play 91/66 and we should want as much money in preflop as we can. I might even raise to like $35.
|
|
|
|
bjsaust
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Ballarat, Australia
Posts: 5,842
|
|
I tend to get a bit silly with my 3-bets with AA/KK v's people who cant fold. Too much value not to 3-bet extra large if we're confident they'll call a lot. Get the money now incase they completely miss the flop and find they have a fold button.
|
|
Just playing to improve.
|
|
STHollywood
|
04-14-2009, 08:56 PM
Post subject: Re: 200NL: KK and an apparent donk
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
3-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: New York
Posts: 107
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by d0zer
villain 91/66 over 12 hands
$1/$2 No Limit Holdem
6 players
Converted at weaktight.com
Stacks:
UTG gamesman09 ($177.10)
UTG+1 Phwap ( $200.00)
CO GunTucker45 ( $159.75)
BTN GeniusEC ( $200.00)
SB mjrnt ( $221.70)
BB Hero ($348.75)
Pre-flop: ( $3, 6 players) Hero is BB
gamesman09 raises to $8, 4 folds, Hero raises to $24, gamesman09 calls $16
Flop:  ( $49, 2 players)
Hero bets $26, gamesman09 calls $26
Turn:  ( $101, 2 players) Hero...checks?
Was talking this hand over with some tosser last night, and the tosser was saying this villain's range is too weak to handle two barrels, so a check is good here. Conventional wisdom is zomg overpair + donk = keep betting till the money's in the middle, but his range is very weak so maybe we should be checking to induce, or to get more value from his underpairs on the river.
That being said, I really wanted to play for stacks here and felt like I had to bet the turn to setup a river shove that wasn't an overshove, also I didn't really know anything about how v played postflop -- if inducing was even worthwhile. I think we've all seen bad donks call three streets with underpairs in worse spots than this, but maybe that frequency isn't high enough for all 3?
Is this all just a whole lot of overthinking of a standard spot?
|
Some tosser? You must be from Australia or England. And obviously bet bet bet bet
|
|
|