|
spino1i
|
02-06-2006, 06:05 AM
Post subject: 200 NL 6-max Bluffing top pair top kicker = bad idea
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: 25/50's f'in hard!
Posts: 893
|
|
This guy thought I had the flush draw despite my smooth call with position. I now know not to make moves on people that continuation bet, because generally if they do so, they dont want to part with their hand!
This hand also illustrates why reraising pre-flop with position is almost ALWAYS a bad idea.
***** Hand History for Game 3503664373 *****
$200 NL Texas Hold'em - Monday, February 06, 02:03:41 EDT 2006
Table Table 65480 (6 max) (No DP) (Real Money)
Seat 6 is the button
Total number of players : 6
Seat 2: seapine ( $103.95 )
Seat 3: JBIGWHEELS ( $532.40 )
Seat 6: Evil_Ecstasy ( $195.85 )
Seat 1: paceosborn ( $244 )
Seat 5: pikay ( $191.80 )
Seat 4: maxdin ( $211.05 )
paceosborn posts small blind [$1].
seapine posts big blind [$2].
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to Evil_Ecstasy [ Qh Qs ]
JBIGWHEELS folds.
maxdin folds.
pikay raises [$8].
Evil_Ecstasy calls [$8].
paceosborn folds.
seapine folds.
** Dealing Flop ** [ 7h, 4h, 5d ]
pikay bets [$15].
Evil_Ecstasy raises [$30].
pikay calls [$15].
** Dealing Turn ** [ 9c ]
pikay bets [$25].
Evil_Ecstasy raises [$100].
pikay is all-In [$128.80]
Evil_Ecstasy calls [$53.80].
** Dealing River ** [ Jd ]
Evil_Ecstasy shows [ Qh, Qs ] a pair of queens.
pikay doesn't show [ Kd, 7d ] a pair of sevens.
Evil_Ecstasy wins $383.60 from the main pot with a pair of queens.
|
|
BR now: $106900
Playing now: $10/10/20 - $20/40 NL live, $10/20 NL full ring online, $10/20 NL 6-max online, $20/40 FL 6-max online, $100/200 FL live
Goal: $125000 for $25/50 NL live
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
sunfunbunch
|
|
Straight
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 176
|
|
Hmmm..... by NOT reraising then you are putting yourself in tougher decisions postflop.
However, THIS flop was GREAT for QQ.
I would have played this the same POSTFLOP. As for preflop, It would depend on my opponent.
If he's not very "good" [haha] then I just go ahead and call his preflop raise.
**As a side note. If I had a hand like AKs, AQs... then I WILL go ahead and reraise this.
QQ [a made hand] is different.
|
|
|
|
Pingviini
|
02-06-2006, 06:55 AM
Post subject: Re: 200 NL 6-max Bluffing top pair top kicker = bad idea
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 1,090
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by spino1i
This guy thought I had the flush draw despite my smooth call with position.
** Dealing Flop ** [ 7h, 4h, 5d ]
pikay bets [$15].
Evil_Ecstasy raises [$30].
pikay calls [$15].
|
I am a bit confused but I guess you are talking about PF call. In general, I dont really like min-raising but they tend to work fine against certain types of fishies. I would just like to hear your reasoning for flop min-raise, juice up the pot? give FE? repserent xxx?
There are numerous scare cards on turn if (and apparently when) villains PFR hand range is wide. Any heart, 8, 7, 3, might be a killer to you.. With this much left I would raise to $50 to create some FE (but also bloating the pot) or just call, keep the pot moderate and try to jam the turn if we think we are ahead.
|
|
"Poker is a simple math game" -Aba20
|
|
gabe
|
02-06-2006, 01:17 PM
Post subject: Re: 200 NL 6-max Bluffing top pair top kicker = bad idea
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: trying to live
Posts: 7,964
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Pingviini
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by spino1i
This guy thought I had the flush draw despite my smooth call with position.
** Dealing Flop ** [ 7h, 4h, 5d ]
pikay bets [$15].
Evil_Ecstasy raises [$30].
pikay calls [$15].
|
I am a bit confused but I guess you are talking about PF call. In general, I dont really like min-raising but they tend to work fine against certain types of fishies. I would just like to hear your reasoning for flop min-raise, juice up the pot? give FE? repserent xxx?
There are numerous scare cards on turn if (and apparently when) villains PFR hand range is wide. Any heart, 8, 7, 3, might be a killer to you.. With this much left I would raise to $50 to create some FE (but also bloating the pot) or just call, keep the pot moderate and try to jam the turn if we think we are ahead.
|
i agree, theres a good spot for minraising, but this is not one of them
|
|
|
|
outphase
|
02-06-2006, 01:24 PM
Post subject: Re: 200 NL 6-max Bluffing top pair top kicker = bad idea
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 949
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by spino1i
This hand also illustrates why reraising pre-flop with position is almost ALWAYS a bad idea.
|
I don't get it, you didn't reraise. Your opp only raised.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by lambchopdc
Lets stop talking ABC poker and move on to D, E, and F.
|
|
|
midas06
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NZ
Posts: 2,196
|
|
He's saying that if he did reraise, then he wouldn't have got nearly as much action.
|
|
|
|
arkana
|
02-06-2006, 02:29 PM
Post subject: Re: 200 NL 6-max Bluffing top pair top kicker = bad idea
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,109
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by spino1i
This hand also illustrates why reraising pre-flop with position is almost ALWAYS a bad idea.
|
If you only reraise with AA-QQ preflop, then yes.
|
|
|
|
gabe
|
02-06-2006, 03:06 PM
Post subject: Re: 200 NL 6-max Bluffing top pair top kicker = bad idea
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: trying to live
Posts: 7,964
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by spino1i
This hand also illustrates why reraising pre-flop with position is almost ALWAYS a bad idea.
|
there are times where you might make more by smooth calling preflop, but reraising with these hands is almost NEVER a bad idea.
|
|
|