Poker Forum

Over 1,247,000 Posts!

Subscribe to FTR web feed
Already Registered?      Username:    Password:   Remember      Forgot Password
  >    > 

Wild maniac tables - adjustments?

  
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
eugmac
Old 02-28-2010, 11:41 AM     Post subject: Wild maniac tables - adjustments? #1 (permalink)  
eugmac's Avatar
Full House

Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 739
eugmac will become famous soon enougheugmac will become famous soon enough
I visited a casino cardroom the other day and got absolutely caned - down 5.2BI. The stakes are £1-1 NL, £200 Max - but I sat with £100 the whole night.

The FR tables appear to be about ~2-4 Lag-tards who put in ridiculous amounts of money preflop (think: calling a 4-bet preflop with Q7s), couple total loose passive fish, maybe one nut camper, and maybe one or two uncreative TAGGs.

A good lot of them, particularly the LAGGs and TAGGs, tend to sit with around the max, with the total fish sitting with say 50bb, nut campers sitting with 100bb.

I played yesterday with 100BB the whole night, because that's my comfort zone - but because the high frequency of 3-bet pots preflop, I often felt like I was effectively playing 10BB deep!

Action often looks like the following, one of the maniacs comes in for a 5bb raise, multiple loose players call, and then another maniac comes in for a big reraise to 30BB. Very seldom does this 3-bet take down the pot - you can expect at least one caller, quite often 2. After this point, if two maniacs are in the pot together, it's just big bet chicken. At this table it appears to be pure spew to call behind with small PP and whatnot because of the fear of a big reraise coming.

I was also in the unfortunate place of sitting directly to the right of the maniacs, so I could never get position on them. In retrospect I certainly should have tried for a seat/table change.

So my questions on how I should adjust for such a table:

1) Optimal buy-in? Should I start buying in for max?

2) Preflop play - I have to ditch all implied odds hands except in exceptional circumstances, like when for once when we're playing a limped pot and i'm on the button? Where do we start drawing the line between a small pair that we play for pure set value that we often have to throw away, and a medium pocket pair that I can maybe 3-bet with to isolate a maniac? Is there a place here for slow-playing AA and KK? How often should I be 3-betting with two big unpaired cards like KQ, ATo?

3) Bankroll-wise, how large should I expect the swings to be?
Reply With Quote
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
drmcboy
Old 02-28-2010, 06:20 PM #2 (permalink)  
drmcboy's Avatar
DrButtInski
Administrator

Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 9,603
drmcboy has disabled reputation
to the right of maniacs is perfect short stack (sounds like that might be 100BBs here) spot, limp/call first raise, re ship over 3 bet, get paid. Once you double up it's probably hit and run time until you get more experience/BR. Maybe nit it up for 30 mins to make it look good if you play same folks a lot.
Reply With Quote
eugmac
Old 03-01-2010, 07:30 AM #3 (permalink)  
eugmac's Avatar
Full House

Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 739
eugmac will become famous soon enougheugmac will become famous soon enough
interesting - how does this compare to sitting to their left? are you saying that I should try to avoid all post-flop play altogether?
Reply With Quote
drmcboy
Old 03-01-2010, 03:26 PM #4 (permalink)  
drmcboy's Avatar
DrButtInski
Administrator

Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 9,603
drmcboy has disabled reputation
let's give you 150 BBs in the HJ, maniac is on the CO. You have KQ. 3 limps to you, you limp, maniac makes it 10 BBs and everyone calls, pot is 50 BB. Flop comes K T 7r. Now everyone will check to the maniac. Even though your position seems bad since the maniac is behind you, what has actually happened is you basically have the button because you get to see how the whole table reacts now. If people start jamming over the 3 bet guy, you can fold. But if they fold back around to you it's a easy ship, and you may even get called by way worse since he'll be getting 2/1 coming back.

you'll also often end up closing the action with great pot odds to draw or semi bluff depending on the action/hand.

If you flop a set yourself, you also trap people CRing the lag with 1 pair.

Now same scenario except you are the BU, the 'best' position, to the left of the maniac. Everyone still checks to the lagg, but you have to act first after him and if you flat/shove your TP you're going to run smack into the sets/two pair/AKs that were going for a CR.

It's absolute position (where the BU is) vs relative position (where the raiser is).

Now we stay to the left of the lagg and move the button one spot, and it's even worse. You are the SB and have to act first post flop AND have to act first after the maniac's action.

As you get deeper the edge will switch back to the lagg, because he'll be able to put you in tough spots on the turn and river.


If you're shorter, often you'll be able to use this same action pre flop, where you'll shove over with say top 5% after the maniac raises and everyone flats. Or make a big enough 3 bet that you can shove most flops

Check out Rolf Slootboom's Omaha books, esp the first one. He made a living short stacking to the right of maniacs.
Reply With Quote
eugmac
Old 03-01-2010, 04:37 PM #5 (permalink)  
eugmac's Avatar
Full House

Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 739
eugmac will become famous soon enougheugmac will become famous soon enough
thanks drmcboy, you couldn't have explained it clearer!
i'll be bearing all that in mind tonight...
Reply With Quote
baudib
Old 03-02-2010, 02:19 AM #6 (permalink)  
baudib's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,233
baudib is a jewel in the roughbaudib is a jewel in the roughbaudib is a jewel in the rough
Send a message via AIM to baudib
Doc, that's one of the most brilliant posts I've read here...well, at least, it helped crystallize something that I had been tossing around in my head.

Typically, when I'm facing aggressive deepstack players, I request seat changes to get to their left. But being on their immediate left was seriously problematic for me in a few spots, especially if they straddle (as deepstacked aggressive players often do), effectively taking away my button every orbit.
Reply With Quote
Silly String
Old 03-04-2010, 09:43 PM #7 (permalink)  
Silly String's Avatar
Full House

Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: KC, MO
Posts: 1,434
Silly String
Re-straddle that sonovabich
Playing live . . . thanks alot Bin Laden.
 
Reply With Quote
Reply
Latest Poker News
Bbickes Old 06-02-2012, 08:10 PM    Merge Network 6.0 Looks to Retain Current Player Base
In an effort to perhaps keep players from moving to the new Revolution Network setup by the former Lock Poker, Merge Network has taken drastic steps to respond to their player base's requests to impro ...

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 02:36 AM.


FTR Testimonials

All content
© FlopTurnRiver.com
Advertising  |   Partners  |   Testimonials  |   T&C  |   Contact Us  |   FTR News & Press  |   Site Map  |   Search FTR

Full Tilt  |   Titan Poker  |   UltimateBet  |   Poker Stars  |   Ladbrokes Bonus  |   Sportsbook  |   Cake Poker  

Play Texas Holdem Online, Online Texas Holdem Strategy, & Poker Forum
This is not a gambling website.