Poker Forum

Over 1,247,000 Posts!

Subscribe to FTR web feed
Already Registered?      Username:    Password:   Remember      Forgot Password
  >    > 

Poker prize distribution

  
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Biren
Old 04-16-2005, 06:11 AM     Post subject: Poker prize distribution #1 (permalink)  

Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 27
Biren
Send a message via AIM to Biren
Ok we play poker tournaments at a friends house all the time. The buy in is $5 and it's your good old No-Limit Texas Hold 'Em. Here is where the conflict sets in.

It's usually six people playing. So the pot is $30. And second place gets their money back and first place wins $25.

I spoke up against this and said that it is unfair. There are six people that you start off with. If fighting through the four of them, and I end up only winning my money back, then there was no point.

I said that we should raise the prizes to second places gets $10 and first place gets $20. First place still makes 4x the buy-in and second place doubles their buy in. I think that's a little more fair. Because second place should get more because of the effort that they have to put in to place second out of six people.

What do you all think? Which one is more fair and why?

How should the prices be if there were 7, 8, 10 people in?
Reply With Quote
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
TenPercenter
Old 04-16-2005, 05:00 PM     Post subject: Re: Poker prize distribution #2 (permalink)  
TenPercenter's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 16
TenPercenter
Send a message via ICQ to TenPercenter Send a message via AIM to TenPercenter Send a message via MSN to TenPercenter Send a message via Yahoo to TenPercenter
Quote:
Originally Posted by Biren
Ok we play poker tournaments at a friends house all the time. The buy in is $5 and it's your good old No-Limit Texas Hold 'Em. Here is where the conflict sets in.

It's usually six people playing. So the pot is $30. And second place gets their money back and first place wins $25.

I spoke up against this and said that it is unfair. There are six people that you start off with. If fighting through the four of them, and

I end up only winning my money back, then there was no point.

I said that we should raise the prizes to second places gets $10 and first place gets $20. First place still makes 4x the buy-in and second place doubles their buy in. I think that's a little more fair. Because second place should get more because of the effort that they have to put in to place second out of six people.

What do you all think? Which one is more fair and why?

How should the prices be if there were 7, 8, 10 people in?
Honestly? I dont think second place should have gotten anything. That's too small a group for two prizes. My rule of thumb is first place only until 9-10 entries, then a second place and a place paid for about every six more over ten.

Ten
TenPercenter

 
Reply With Quote
thepokerdude
Old 04-16-2005, 10:24 PM #3 (permalink)  
thepokerdude's Avatar
Straight

Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: The Dude Abides
Posts: 170
thepokerdude
Send a message via MSN to thepokerdude
i disagree ten, i think that second should get ten and first 20. if this were a casino or online game where everyone was a stranger, then yes, only first should win. but in my experience with my own home game, they can tend to be a grind, especially with six or seven people who all know each other, are used to each other's play, and only play once every two weeks when we all get together.

if only first place paid out, then the chances are you could go for six months and never win anything, and in a hard grind like a tournament among friends, that can really suck. i agree with you biren, that should be the payout, it gives more hope to the guys who keep getting third and fourth.
"But they were suited?!?! You idiot!!"
 
Reply With Quote
TenPercenter
Old 04-17-2005, 11:37 PM #4 (permalink)  
TenPercenter's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 16
TenPercenter
Send a message via ICQ to TenPercenter Send a message via AIM to TenPercenter Send a message via MSN to TenPercenter Send a message via Yahoo to TenPercenter
Quote:
Originally Posted by thepokerdude
i disagree ten, i think that second should get ten and first 20. if this were a casino or online game where everyone was a stranger, then yes, only first should win. but in my experience with my own home game, they can tend to be a grind, especially with six or seven people who all know each other, are used to each other's play, and only play once every two weeks when we all get together.

if only first place paid out, then the chances are you could go for six months and never win anything, and in a hard grind like a tournament among friends, that can really suck. i agree with you biren, that should be the payout, it gives more hope to the guys who keep getting third and fourth.
i see where you're coming from, and i could easily accept two places if that's what the group wants. if its a weekly game though, your chances are good to place often, if your a decent player

ten
TenPercenter

 
Reply With Quote
FyrFytr998
Old 04-18-2005, 01:11 AM #5 (permalink)  
FyrFytr998's Avatar
Full House

Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Milford,Ct.
Posts: 1,412
FyrFytr998
Quote:
Originally Posted by thepokerdude
i disagree ten, i think that second should get ten and first 20. if this were a casino or online game where everyone was a stranger, then yes, only first should win. but in my experience with my own home game, they can tend to be a grind, especially with six or seven people who all know each other, are used to each other's play, and only play once every two weeks when we all get together.

if only first place paid out, then the chances are you could go for six months and never win anything, and in a hard grind like a tournament among friends, that can really suck. i agree with you biren, that should be the payout, it gives more hope to the guys who keep getting third and fourth.
I agree. Because if there is a great player among the average. Who'll want to play that game? No one that's who. I know I wouldn't waste my money all the time if it were a pretty good certainty that it'd be one specific person always winning the games.

Don't get me wrong. Anyone can win at any time, but more than one prize keeps hope alive and the game interesting. A 20/10 split is the way to go

Big Lick
 
Reply With Quote
Buckeye
Old 04-18-2005, 03:22 AM #6 (permalink)  

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 53
Buckeye
20/10 for sure.

Buckeye
Reply With Quote
Biren
Old 04-18-2005, 01:31 PM #7 (permalink)  

Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 27
Biren
Send a message via AIM to Biren
Thanks for feedback, guys. Other players still don't get this concept, so I have to be extreme and refuse to play if they don't set up the prizes that way.
Reply With Quote
Reply
Latest Poker News
Bbickes Old 06-02-2012, 08:10 PM    Merge Network 6.0 Looks to Retain Current Player Base
In an effort to perhaps keep players from moving to the new Revolution Network setup by the former Lock Poker, Merge Network has taken drastic steps to respond to their player base's requests to impro ...

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 12:37 AM.


FTR Testimonials

All content
© FlopTurnRiver.com
Advertising  |   Partners  |   Testimonials  |   T&C  |   Contact Us  |   FTR News & Press  |   Site Map  |   Search FTR

Full Tilt  |   Titan Poker  |   UltimateBet  |   Poker Stars  |   Ladbrokes Bonus  |   Sportsbook  |   Cake Poker  

Play Texas Holdem Online, Online Texas Holdem Strategy, & Poker Forum
This is not a gambling website.