|
tipitina
|
03-10-2005, 11:16 AM
Post subject: My first deck of Copag's
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 19
|
|
I just purchased my first deck of copag's from a local casino supply store. They shuffle like butter if thats possible. VERY smooth and easy to shuffle. But the seem almost paper thin. Is this the way the plastic ones feel? Haven't played with em yet, but I was just curious.....Should play with em tomorrow night.
|
|
I wish I could win everytime!!
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
FyrFytr998
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Milford,Ct.
Posts: 1,412
|
|
Kem's are thicker, but not by much. And shuffle just as smooth. I'm thinking of picking up a deck of copags for a comparison.
|
|
|
|
tipitina
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 19
|
|
still haven't played with 'em....... 
they are much thinner than the decks I have from casinos though...
anyone else notice this
they may still be great......just making sure i didnt get ripped, they do have the plastic case
|
|
I wish I could win everytime!!
|
|
Humphrind
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 1,887
|
|
Bought the Kems, bought the Copags. There are differences, but not enough to notice during a normal game, and it'll take a while to recognize the endurance part of the test.
|
|
I don't know what they have to say
It makes no difference anyway.
Whatever it is...
I'm against it.
|
|
FyrFytr998
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Milford,Ct.
Posts: 1,412
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Humphrind
Bought the Kems, bought the Copags. There are differences, but not enough to notice during a normal game, and it'll take a while to recognize the endurance part of the test.
|
I can't say the same for KEM's vs. Royals. The royal cards are really thin like tip describes the copags. So I need to see for myself.
|
|
|
|
Gumbo
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: MA - Go Patriots!!!
Posts: 8
|
|
I broke out the Copags for a home game on Saturday. Everyone liked the feel and how they shuffled. My table surface is a velveteen (rather than felt) and the copags just slid right across as smooth as can be.
Gumbo
|
|
|
|
ChezJ
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Washington, D.C.
Posts: 1,456
|
|
copags are nowhere near as thin as royals. royals suck. do not compare the two, they are totally a breed apart.
you said the copags are thinner than the decks you have from casinos. what are these, used blackjack decks you bought for $1.50? those are shitty cardboard cards with a plastic coating, just like plain old bicycle cards.
i have never heard of a casino selling their poker cards, which are typically KEM or gemaco. casino KEMs are slightly thicker than home use KEMs. i think the home use KEMs are pretty much the same thickness as copags.
ChezJ
|
|
|
|
Humphrind
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 1,887
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ChezJ
royals suck. do not compare the two,
|
Yup. Kem's are great. Copags are really good. Royals are the "Always Save" of the plastic card world.
|
|
I don't know what they have to say
It makes no difference anyway.
Whatever it is...
I'm against it.
|
|
Krotalus
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 76
|
|
i just got my first Copags in the mail today WOW
they are much nicer than the Royals.
Looks like i will be giving the Royals to my dad who plays solitaire endlessly, maybe they will last him longer than the 2 weeks he normally gets from paper cards
|
|
|
English
Deutsch
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Pусский
Svenska
05-26-2012, 03:08 PM Australia Legalized Online Poker coming up in next 6 to 12 Months
Linear Mode
