|
Fnord
|
03-01-2009, 06:49 AM
Post subject: Limp pots (and completing the SB)
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,334
|
|
Kudos to Bobbo Fitos for leading me down the right path here.
There are a lot of limp pots in live games, so it can be quite a contrast compared to folks who are used to online games where the majority of the player pool brings it in for a raise.
Your general goal in a limp pot should be to bet out and take down the pot or value bet a good hand. Your goal is not to limp, catch a monster and get someone to call you down with a worse hand (this is not how you win a big NLHE pot contrary to what my opponents think.) A lot of rag hands make pretty good second best hands anyway. So you should be betting. Now isn't the time for check raising or trapping with top pair (since it's hard to read hands you will often find yourself trapped when a lot of money is bet on the river.)
A huge factor is how many people saw the binds. After a single limper or two I will often complete my SB intending on leading out on a lot of flops. Any pair, any draw, any gutshot or even air I'm leading out and expecting to take it down. Fail that, it's a great spot to build mistrust on the cheap. I'm not looking to catch anything, that's my opponent's job.
However, after several limpers, I'll usually just fold out of the SB because now I need to make a hand and often I'll run into a better one. Also in massivly multi-way pots it's often correct to fold weak flush draws (without other outs) and non-nut straight draws as too often you'll be drawing light or dead with no money in the pot pre-flop.
One of my favorite live plays is to mix up light raising on the button with over-limping. While raising makes the pot bigger and will thin the field, limping gives you more information about the hands out there and room to make very cheap feeler bets. With a low rake or time charge I like to mix up both when playing my button against weak opponents.
|
|
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
floptquadswunc
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: nowhere and everywhere
Posts: 44
|
|
I, after reading this Fnord, assume you are discussing adequate stack sizes for the blinds you have. For instance, having at least 75-100 BB in everyone's stack. I would agree with your strategy for such a game.
Would you still play the same style if the buy-in was limited to 20 BB's? In such a game there may be half the folks with 40-100 BB and the other half of the table has 20 or less BB in their stack.
The reason I ask is because of the game we have in Fl. I find it difficult to raise to $20 in a 2-5 game, getting 2 or more callers, and knowing if anyone hits any piece of the flop they are not going away, and they probably shouldn't.
I've found limping and playing better post-flop to be more effective. It's difficult though because of the continued multi-player flops.
I'm still very undecided about all of it though. I am struggling to find the optimum style of play for this game. Right now, as I said, I'm in the tight-passive pre-flop, and then feeling my way through the hand post flop. Pot commitment comes quickly in such a game.... Does anyone have any suggestions?
|
|
|
|
naturalassassin
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 59
|
|
I like the overlimp and minraise feeler play. That's new to me. Great post for live play.
I believe even with a 20BB game and someone limps in front of you a min-raise is an excellent play in live poker. It's always a good idea to pay the minimum for information. With only 20BB... you're hoping no one has you crushed if you make it 3BB-4BB because you will have to throw you're hand away and if the flop comes it's going to be harder for your opponents to get away from a hand. You want to win a pot without confrontation IMO.
I'd like to know what Fnord makes the min-raise with. A loose hand range? and is he limping with almost any two?
|
|
Don't knock on deaths door... ring the bell and run! Death hates that LOL.
|
|
Fnord
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,334
|
|
20bbish deep you shouldn't be playing limp poker. At that point you're shoving pre-flop or on the flop.
88+, AJ+, KQ and suited broadways are for the most part your playable range in that game with some addjustments. Probably going to the SnG/MMT forum and reading about pushing ranges would help as well.
|
|
|
|
floptquadswunc
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: nowhere and everywhere
Posts: 44
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Fnord
20bbish deep you should be playing limp poker. At that point you're shoving pre-flop or on the flop.
88+, AJ+, KQ and suited broadways are for the most part your playable range in that game with some addjustments. Probably going to the SnG/MMT forum and reading about pushing ranges would help as well.
|
That is the range I was thinking of. I'll take a look at the sng forum.
|
|
|
|
LawDude
|
03-02-2009, 09:19 PM
Post subject: Re: Limp pots (and completing the SB)
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 940
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Fnord
Kudos to Bobbo Fitos for leading me down the right path here.
There are a lot of limp pots in live games, so it can be quite a contrast compared to folks who are used to online games where the majority of the player pool brings it in for a raise.
Your general goal in a limp pot should be to bet out and take down the pot or value bet a good hand. Your goal is not to limp, catch a monster and get someone to call you down with a worse hand (this is not how you win a big NLHE pot contrary to what my opponents think.) A lot of rag hands make pretty good second best hands anyway. So you should be betting. Now isn't the time for check raising or trapping with top pair (since it's hard to read hands you will often find yourself trapped when a lot of money is bet on the river.)
A huge factor is how many people saw the binds. After a single limper or two I will often complete my SB intending on leading out on a lot of flops. Any pair, any draw, any gutshot or even air I'm leading out and expecting to take it down. Fail that, it's a great spot to build mistrust on the cheap. I'm not looking to catch anything, that's my opponent's job.
However, after several limpers, I'll usually just fold out of the SB because now I need to make a hand and often I'll run into a better one. Also in massivly multi-way pots it's often correct to fold weak flush draws (without other outs) and non-nut straight draws as too often you'll be drawing light or dead with no money in the pot pre-flop.
One of my favorite live plays is to mix up light raising on the button with over-limping. While raising makes the pot bigger and will thin the field, limping gives you more information about the hands out there and room to make very cheap feeler bets. With a low rake or time charge I like to mix up both when playing my button against weak opponents.
|
This is a fascinating perspective, and I suspect it's more right than what I have always done.
The way I have always viewed this problem is that if you have a lot of limpers, what you want to do is be limping in with better hands than they do, when you choose to limp. In other words, what I often see is people limping in with unconnected suited cards (J4s), unsuited connecting cards (86o), and the like. And since their post-flop play sucks (unlike Fnord, who obviously has thought about what to do when he misses the flop), they are basically playing for the 11-1 or so odds against hitting an OESD or a flush draw. And they limp these hands without the proper number of other limpers, without position, and without reference to whether the Villains' stack sizes are large enough to justify a limp.
In contrast, if you wait and only limp relatively high suited connectors in position with lots of limpers behind you, you can end up in great situations where you have the better straight, the better flush, the higher pair or 2 pair, etc. And you will be getting much better implied odds on your pre-flop calls. Essentially, by being more selective about your limping, you are making higher expected value plays than your opponents. And that's how to win money in poker.
I would still advocate that as a good way of thinking about the strategy. But I think what Fnord is saying makes a ton of sense too.
|
|
|
|
floptquadswunc
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: nowhere and everywhere
Posts: 44
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by LawDude
In contrast, if you wait and only limp relatively high suited connectors in position with lots of limpers behind you, you can end up in great situations where you have the better straight, the better flush, the higher pair or 2 pair, etc. And you will be getting much better implied odds on your pre-flop calls. Essentially, by being more selective about your limping, you are making higher expected value plays than your opponents. And that's how to win money in poker.
.
|
truth.
|
|
|
|
Fnord
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,334
|
|
Law, it's not an either this or that decision.
Sure I'll take 98s over 56s any day. But I'm playing both of them.
One of my more profitable hands last night was T2suited!!!!
One limper, I isolated with T2s on the button, SB calls (just sat down), tight BB calls, limper decides that he doesn't want to give me any more action.
$155 or so in the pot
Flop is:

I bet $75
SB: "has he been doing this all night or did he just start?"
BB: "just started" (I love her so much in a non-sexual way right now)
Fold, Fold
I took a nice $100 profit and took the seat to the left of the SB a couple hands later; position raped him for an hour, racked up nearly $4k and called it a night.
|
|
|
|
LawDude
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 940
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Fnord
Law, it's not an either this or that decision.
Sure I'll take 98s over 56s any day. But I'm playing both of them.
One of my more profitable hands last night was T2suited!!!!
One limper, I isolated with T2s on the button, SB calls (just sat down), tight BB calls, limper decides that he doesn't want to give me any more action.
$155 or so in the pot
Flop is:
I bet $75
SB: "has he been doing this all night or did he just start?"
BB: "just started" (I love her so much in a non-sexual way right now)
Fold, Fold
I took a nice $100 profit and took the seat to the left of the SB a couple hands later; position raped him for an hour, racked up nearly $4k and called it a night.
|
Glad you had a great night. I had the opposite. In 4 hours of 9-18, I saw JJ, QQ, KK, or AA 7 times. (1 AA, 1 KK, 4 QQ, and 1 JJ). I raised all these hands pre-flop. I won the AA pot against one caller. I also won the blinds on one of the QQ's where everyone folded.
As for the rest:
KK was called down to the river by a player who flopped nothing and then hit a runner-runner straight.
QQ was called down to the river by 3 players, one of whom had J6o and rivered 2 pair.
QQ was called pre-flop by a player with KK, and I didn't catch a queen.
JJ was called down to the river by a guy with A2o, who hit his ace on the river.
And finally, my favorite:
QQ was called down to the river by 2 players, including a player with 53o, who rivered trips 5's.
Plus we had a maniac at our table who kept on catching impossible cards. He felted like 4 players.
Meanwhile, when I wasn't seeing my high pocket pairs get cracked, I wasn't doing a thing. I never saw a single set of suited connectors or one-gappers, I had only a handful of other playable hands, and the one time I had a great opportunity to iso-raise A9 on the button against the maniac, a player who had played practically no hands for an hour decided to re-raise him, I figured the guy must have a high pocket pair or have a stronger ace, so I folded. Flop came up A92, two blanks fell, and maniac turned over T5, while tight player won the pot with a pocket pair of 3's.
Boy I had a great time.
|
|
|
|
Fnord
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,334
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by LawDude
In 4 hours of 9-18
|
Here's your problem 
Glad to hear the Commerce 9/18 is still donktastic. I've been getting mixed reviews.
|
|
|
|
LawDude
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 940
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Fnord
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by LawDude
In 4 hours of 9-18
|
Here's your problem
Glad to hear the Commerce 9/18 is still donktastic. I've been getting mixed reviews.
|
Generally, it's been very much like that the last few times I have played in the evening. Throw as many chips in as you can and hope something good happens. They play a much more rational 8/16 kill game at Hollywood Park, which I would recommend for anyone who doesn't like to watch idiots collect huge pots when they call down bad hands and catch something. On the other hand, despite the enormous variance, obviously if you play positive expected value poker, there's more money to be made in Commerce 9/18.
But a week ago, I was at the 9/18 table on a Sunday afternoon and actually caught a normal game without the donkeys and the maniacs. It was quite amazing to play in a game where nobody was calling a preflop raise with 8c4c and where players would actually fold gutshot straight draws. I'd forgotten that some folks actually come to the casino to play poker and not simply to practice throwing their chips around like tiny frisbees.
So I guess it just depends.
|
|
|
|
Fnord
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,334
|
|
Ever heard of schooling?
|
|
|