|
Excalibur
|
02-17-2006, 07:44 PM
Post subject: Home tourney - Times, blinds etc?
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 81
|
|
I've downloaded the "Check n Raise Tournament Director's Poker Clock"...
Seems very good, but the problem is how to set it up for the best tourney-results...
50 SEK and we get a 500 chipstack... (50 SEK is about $6,5)
8 players...
How should we set up the time between the increasing blind?
10 mins, 15 mins, more???
Should you shorten the time between the blinds-reaise at the end of the tourney? If you're the first one out it's a shitty wait before you can play again...
Blind-levels?
5/10
10/20
20/40
50/100
100/200
150/300
200/400
500/1000
Is this good? Or do you have any other experiences?
Thnx!
|
|
I love the feel of Hold'em control...
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
cardsman1992
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Being enjoyed at Jack's Bar since 1397
Posts: 1,065
|
|
With short chipstacks, I would go 10 min blind levels.
I would do 25/50 instead of 20/40, but 20/40 is good too. Otherwise it looks good.
You could do one rebuy to keep people from having to wait so long if they bust out within the first few minutes, but I personally HATE rebuys with a passion. Turns a tourney into an all-in fest. Especially if it is unlimited.....
Once you get down to two or three guys, the others may start a side game anyway. 8 person tourney probably wouldn't really take that long, though.
|
|
|
|
Renton
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
Posts: 5,991
|
|
Ten minute blind levels are insane for live play. Twenty minutes MINIMUM. I does depend on the stacks and the actually blinds being posted (e.g. if the initial blinds are 1/50 to 1/100 of the initial stack, then the time needs to be at least twenty min.). With smaller blinds initially, you can have a faster increase.
|
|
|
|
cardsman1992
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Being enjoyed at Jack's Bar since 1397
Posts: 1,065
|
|
You're probably right, 10 min is too short. But I have played a lot of live tourneys with 15 minutes and that seems to work okay.
|
|
|
|
SteveA
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 27
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by cardsman1992
You're probably right, 10 min is too short. But I have played a lot of live tourneys with 15 minutes and that seems to work okay.
|
If you use really short blinds, your tourney will be more about luck and less about poker.
You should check out this site: homepokertourney.com
|
|
SteveA
|
|
midas06
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NZ
Posts: 2,196
|
|
However, if it's just for fun, and you want your friends to keep playing, short blind levels isn't a bad idea.
A different approach that I use is to do blind levels by a set number of orbits (assuming it's a single table tourny)
|
|
|
|
darmmrk
|
02-22-2006, 08:53 PM
Post subject: blind levels
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 7
|
|
At my home games, we raise the blinds on every orbit which seems to work well. We play 1 hour SnG's. Chip leader at the end of the hour wins. With 8 players we almost always are down to 1 or 2 in the hour.
|
|
|