Poker Forum

Over 1,247,000 Posts!

Subscribe to FTR web feed
Already Registered?      Username:    Password:   Remember      Forgot Password
  >    > 

valuetowning myself?... 2/5 pounds

  
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
griffey24
Old 06-25-2008, 04:59 AM     Post subject: valuetowning myself?... 2/5 pounds #1 (permalink)  
griffey24's Avatar
Straight Flush

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Toronto'ish
Posts: 4,611
griffey24 is on a distinguished road
Hand 1:

-villain is a solid tagg reg
-our history is that he has seen me triple barrel him several times the last week or so and he has never called one of them, and folded all river third barrels
-I haven't shown many bluffs, but he is on a few of my tables. At some of these tables I am in a 3-betting spewing battle with another guy and am showing up with trashy hands and playing pretty splashy. He maaay think I'm tilting.. but not sure.
-This river is pretty crappy that a lot of marginal hands might check through. I decided to bet almost pot to rep a bluff of sorts and get called light
-too thin?


Cryptologic
No Limit Holdem Ring game
Blinds: $2/$5
3 players
Converter

Stack sizes:
Hero: $627
SB: $637
BB: $1650

Pre-flop: (3 players) Hero is Button with
Hero raises to $20, SB folds, BB calls.

Flop: ($42, 2 players)
BB checks, Hero bets $30, BB calls.

Turn: ($102, 2 players)
BB checks, Hero bets $70, BB calls.

River: ($242, 2 players)
BB checks, Hero bets $230, BB calls.


Hand 2:
-Not that many hands on villain but he's running 23/11/1.25 over a few hundred hands
-I bet this turn probably about 90% of the time, but decided to check here
-River raise standard? too thin?

Cryptologic
No Limit Holdem Ring game
Blinds: $2/$5
5 players
Converter

Stack sizes:
Hero: $519
CO: $753.74
Button: $632
SB: $654.20
BB: $771.52

Pre-flop: (5 players) Hero is UTG with
Hero raises to $20, 2 folds, SB calls, BB folds.

Flop: ($45, 2 players)
SB checks, Hero bets $30, SB calls.

Turn: ($105, 2 players)
SB checks, Hero checks.

River: ($105, 2 players)
SB bets $55, Hero raises to $140
Reply With Quote
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
zook
Old 06-25-2008, 05:47 AM #2 (permalink)  
zook's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,676
zook
I think you're turning your hand into a bluff in both cases.
Reply With Quote
nutsinho
Old 06-25-2008, 07:25 AM #3 (permalink)  
nutsinho's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: flattin ur 4bets, makin u tilt
Posts: 3,280
nutsinho will become famous soon enough
1 is too thin, he's gonna show up with a bunch more hands than 87/77/76 (which may often fold river), and they all beat you.

2 i dont think is turning your hand into a bluff but i think 5x calls you more than Ax does.
My bankroll is the amount of money I would spend or lose before I got a job. It is calculated by adding my net worth to whatever I can borrow.
 
Reply With Quote
Irisheyes
Old 06-25-2008, 11:18 AM #4 (permalink)  
Irisheyes's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: over there
Posts: 3,708
Irisheyes
First one is too thin but I like your bet sizing.
Second one I like.
Reply With Quote
The Odds God
Old 06-25-2008, 10:53 PM #5 (permalink)  
Flush

Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 252
The Odds God
hand 1 too thin

hand 2 what was your reason for checking turn? as played, I like river. You are not repping much and people never believe you when you check back turn.
The secret to success in poker is to rig the odds in your favor.
 
Reply With Quote
Alexos
Old 06-25-2008, 11:30 PM #6 (permalink)  
Alexos's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Montreal
Posts: 2,766
Alexos is on a distinguished road
1- too thin b/c I think a lot of kickers are beating you and are often calling, and also he has a lot of 5x in his range or two pair. If u had A8 or 99 it would be somewhat better. Even if you had those hands, I prefer a smaller size maybe 190.

2- bet turn. As played minraise river ftw
Nine to five is how to survive - I ain't trying to survive / I'm trying to live it to the limit and love it a lot //

Can offer RB deals on most sites, PM me.
 
Reply With Quote
pocketfours
Old 06-26-2008, 07:44 AM #7 (permalink)  
pocketfours's Avatar
Moderator

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Lighting sweet moneys on fire.
Posts: 2,166
pocketfours will become famous soon enough
These might or might not be too thin, but I like them both for mixing it up. You often get called by worse in both cases by players who are trying to own you. The worse you think your image is, the more I like these.

You should never check behind the turn in hand 2.
Reply With Quote
griffey24
Old 06-26-2008, 12:35 PM #8 (permalink)  
griffey24's Avatar
Straight Flush

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Toronto'ish
Posts: 4,611
griffey24 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by pocketfours
You should never check behind the turn in hand 2.
People seem hung up on this turn check, and to that I say:

Quote:
Originally Posted by griffey24
-I bet this turn probably about 90% of the time, but decided to check here
I rarely check behind this turn. But, I think you should never "never check back this turn" cause that's not really good either!

I agree with P4's though that if hand 1 is too thin, it's kind of a value bluff. Better hands call often, worse hands call sometimes, and it could be decent for image and merging your triple barreling range.
Reply With Quote
pocketfours
Old 06-26-2008, 01:16 PM #9 (permalink)  
pocketfours's Avatar
Moderator

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Lighting sweet moneys on fire.
Posts: 2,166
pocketfours will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by griffey24
I rarely check behind this turn. But, I think you should never "never check back this turn" cause that's not really good either!
Why is it not good? I bet that turn with close to 100% of my range, so I don't see why I should sometimes check behind a good ace. Occasionally checking behind with a good ace takes away credibility from your barrels and so I would never check behind here and I don't see why that is bad.
Reply With Quote
griffey24
Old 06-26-2008, 01:22 PM #10 (permalink)  
griffey24's Avatar
Straight Flush

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Toronto'ish
Posts: 4,611
griffey24 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by pocketfours
Quote:
Originally Posted by griffey24
I rarely check behind this turn. But, I think you should never "never check back this turn" cause that's not really good either!
Why is it not good? I bet that turn with close to 100% of my range, so I don't see why I should sometimes check behind a good ace. Occasionally checking behind with a good ace takes away credibility from your barrels and so I would never check behind here and I don't see why that is bad.

If villain is a good hand reader, it should be clear that our range for betting this turn is predominantly only one pair aces (that can't handle much heat), or air. Whereas villain has two pairs, aces and straights in his range. If we are always betting here, he should be c/r'ing that card all day based on both of our ranges alone.

How do you handle a c/r on this turn?
Reply With Quote
pocketfours
Old 06-26-2008, 02:19 PM #11 (permalink)  
pocketfours's Avatar
Moderator

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Lighting sweet moneys on fire.
Posts: 2,166
pocketfours will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by griffey24
If villain is a good hand reader, it should be clear that our range for betting this turn is predominantly only one pair aces (that can't handle much heat), or air. Whereas villain has two pairs, aces and straights in his range. If we are always betting here, he should be c/r'ing that card all day based on both of our ranges alone.

How do you handle a c/r on this turn?
I totally agree that a c/r is a good play here for villain and it's difficult to defend against that. Against an aggro opponent I would check behind here more often to polarize, but still never with AQ.
Reply With Quote
Reply
Latest Poker News
KoRnholio Old 05-26-2012, 03:08 PM    Australia Legalized Online Poker coming up in next 6 to 12 Months
According to an email sent out by Mark Bryan, a gaming analyst at Merrill Lynch, the Australian government plans to legalize online poker sometime in the next six to 12 months. This move will coincide ...

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 11:29 AM.


FTR Testimonials

All content
© FlopTurnRiver.com
Advertising  |   Partners  |   Testimonials  |   T&C  |   Contact Us  |   FTR News & Press  |   Site Map  |   Search FTR

Full Tilt  |   Titan Poker  |   UltimateBet  |   Poker Stars  |   Ladbrokes Bonus  |   Sportsbook  |   Cake Poker  

Play Texas Holdem Online, Online Texas Holdem Strategy, & Poker Forum
This is not a gambling website.