|
ThorKGB
|
11-11-2005, 11:42 PM
Post subject: Mahatma
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 9
|
|
?????
Hand #9173942-26516 at Bhipak (No Limit Hold'em)
Powered by UltimateBet
Started at 11/Nov/05 19:38:30
1D10T is at seat 1 with $15882.
wanabe is at seat 4 with $20022.
rowofducks is at seat 7 with $4436.
Mahatma is at seat 8 with $20012.
hopelep is at seat 9 with $10148 (sitting out).
The button is at seat 4.
rowofducks posts the small blind of $50.
Mahatma posts the big blind of $100.
1D10T: -- --
wanabe: -- --
rowofducks: -- --
Mahatma: -- --
Pre-flop:
1D10T raises to $350. wanabe folds. rowofducks
folds. Mahatma calls.
Flop (board: 2s 7d 4d):
Mahatma bets $750. 1D10T calls.
Turn (board: 2s 7d 4d 3s):
Mahatma bets $2250. 1D10T calls.
River (board: 2s 7d 4d 3s Ah):
Mahatma goes all-in for $16662. 1D10T goes all-in for
$12532. Mahatma is returned $4130 (uncalled).
Showdown:
Mahatma shows Ts 8s.
Mahatma has Ts 8s 7d 4d Ah: ace high.
1D10T shows 2d 2c.
1D10T has 2d 2c 2s 7d Ah: three deuces.
Hand #9173942-26516 Summary:
$2 is raked from a pot of $31814.
1D10T wins $31812 with three deuces.
----------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
DaNutsInYoEye
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 1,921
|
|
Don't question. The guy is good. There is no way to tell what he was thinking other than he thought he could push the other dude off. The real travesty is that they rake $2 from a $30,000 pot at 50/100 and have no problem raking $3 from a $60 pot at 0.50/1.00.
|
|
TheXianti: (Triptanes) why are you not a thinking person?
|
|
PO$$E$$ED
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: SITTING ON 'RILLA'S FINGER
Posts: 263
|
|
Prahlad plays poker like a retarded rhesus monkey. I think his rhymes are mad ill tho, he should switch over into the music biz.
|
|
|
|
michael1123
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Rochester Hills, MI
Posts: 1,720
|
|
You also have to think that he was planning on showing this one off if his opponent folded. Imagine how hard that player would tilt if he laid down his set of dueces.
Its also great for building the insane maniac image, irregardless if the player calls or folds. I'm sure he bets the same way next time when he has it.
Finally, he lost 16k on this hand, but that's not even a full buyin in that game. I doubt you'd be as shocked if an aggressive player made this play in a $200 NL game losing $160. Relatively, its the same loss to him.
|
|
|
|
Greedo017
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: wearing the honors of honor and whatnot
Posts: 1,461
|
|
if that's prahlad, i've watched him on royal vegas bluff off ~40k to.... this other guy who is really good, wanna say like white horse something, i dunno. although, I think prahlad was tilting at that point and the other guy knew it, other guy called the river bluff of like 30k with 2nd pair or something nuts.
|
|
i betcha that i got something you ain't got, that's called courage, it don't come from no liquor bottle, it ain't scotch
|
|
Les_Worm
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: May 2004
Location: MI
Posts: 1,697
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by michael1123
Finally, he lost 16k on this hand, but that's not even a full buyin in that game.
|
I am not familiar w/ UB, let alone this high of stakes, but is 10k not a standard buyin for this game?
|
The artist formerly known as Knish
Only mediocre players are always at their best.
Phil Ivey Owns You
|
|
michael1123
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Rochester Hills, MI
Posts: 1,720
|
|
Oh, you're right. I thought the big game on UB was a 100/200 NL game.
|
|
|
|
gabe
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: trying to live
Posts: 7,964
|
|
its a 50/100 game and mahatma hardly ever shows bluffs.
|
|
|