|
bigred
|
09-14-2005, 08:29 PM
Post subject: High Stakes Laggy players
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
PROFESSIONAL TROLL
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Nest of Douchebags
Posts: 2,184
|
|
I've been experimenting with loose aggressive play (not high stakes, 200NL) and been rather successful but I want some outside advice and learning aids as well as my own experience.
The problem is that the majority of the poker community lessons are tight aggressive play.
I was wondering if people could suggest players to watch online and the usual time they play as well as maybe some sources of good loose aggressive advice.
|
|
LOL OPERATIONS
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
gabe
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: trying to live
Posts: 7,964
|
|
xxthejokerxx is one of the biggest winners in the 10/20 nl game on stars. try datamining pokerstars using starspy and once you get about 10k hands just find who is winning and who is LAG.
|
|
|
|
spino1i
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: 25/50's f'in hard!
Posts: 893
|
|
lately im not seeing the point in loose aggressive play.. even when I was playing 5/10 NL it still payed to play tight. I mean the tight player will always have better hands than the loose player and generally better position as well. And at little cost. This at least holds for 10-max games.
|
|
BR now: $106900
Playing now: $10/10/20 - $20/40 NL live, $10/20 NL full ring online, $10/20 NL 6-max online, $20/40 FL 6-max online, $100/200 FL live
Goal: $125000 for $25/50 NL live
|
|
Bmxicle
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 947
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by spino1i
lately im not seeing the point in loose aggressive play.. even when I was playing 5/10 NL it still payed to play tight. I mean the tight player will always have better hands than the loose player and generally better position as well. And at little cost. This at least holds for 10-max games.
|
yeah, you still need to be very aggressive imo, but not LAGGY.
|
|
|