|
mxiu
|
07-06-2006, 12:37 PM
Post subject: Unsure about this hand...
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 982
|
|
Live 1/2 NL
Villain 1 is a solid TAG. Never see anything out of line from him. ($500~)
Villain 2 is a maniac. Will raise anything pretty. ($230~)
Villain 3 is a tilting fish. ($120~)
I've pretty much been sitting like a rock for the past while. ($1400~)
Hero is dealt 8d8s.
UTG (Villain 1) raises to 12 (standard), Hero calls, UTG+2 (Villain 2, raises to 52), 1 fold, MP2 (Villain 3) calls, 3 folds, Villain 1 calls, Hero?
Do I call the 40 to spike a set, or is this an easy fold?
|
|
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
MrSmiley23
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 72
|
|
your gettin about decent implied to call.. assuming villain 1&3 chip in on post flop
|
|
|
|
Miffed22001
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Marry Me Cheryl!!!
Posts: 8,181
|
|
40 to win 850 if you can get em all in.
Looks like a decent call to me.
|
|
|
|
Staresy
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Following the Herd to 6-Max Land
Posts: 1,240
|
|
Are we playing purely for set value though?
Whats our plan if the flop comes, say 7 hi? or T hi?
|
|
|
|
MrSmiley23
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 72
|
|
(if missed set on flop was referrin to post above) fold it? chances are someone already has a high pocket pair
|
|
|
|
Fnord
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,336
|
|
Loose call, but I would gamble here.
|
|
|
|
Lukie
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: back with a vengeance
Posts: 3,307
|
|
There's already over $160 in the pot with a lot of money behind. Call.
|
|
|
|
Miffed22001
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Marry Me Cheryl!!!
Posts: 8,181
|
|
Quote:
Are we playing purely for set value though?
Whats our plan if the flop comes, say 7 hi? or T hi?
|
Did we miss the preflop action? 88 no good preflop without improvement
At least one person likes there hand plus one person is tilting and will make bad decisions and the other is a fish. Definatly +ev to call here and take stacks with a set.
|
|
|
|
mxiu
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 982
|
|
A lot of the money that we assume we're going to make is off of Villain 1 who is a solid TAG. I'm putting him on a hand like AK, so when he misses his flop, he's out of there quick, but he also knows I'm not an easy player to get chips from, so if I spike a set, he'll have trouble putting money in the pot with me.
If we assume that we are also behind another higher pair, do we still gamble with the maniac and the shortstack fish?
|
|
|
|
Fnord
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,336
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mxiu
If we assume that we are also behind another higher pair, do we still gamble with the maniac and the shortstack fish?
|
Implied odds on your set are good enough. Multi-way pot + 3 customers who figure to give you post-flop action.
|
|
|
English
Deutsch
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Pусский
Svenska
05-26-2012, 03:08 PM Australia Legalized Online Poker coming up in next 6 to 12 Months
Linear Mode
