|
Fnord
|
02-22-2004, 08:36 PM
Post subject: Trap backfires...
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,336
|
|
Would you put him on anything other than a smaller set or two pair?
***** Hand History for Game 408924645 *****
0/0 TexasHTGameTable (NL) - Sun Feb 22 15:49:37 EST 2004
Table Card Room Table 3038 (Real Money) -- Seat 3 is the button
Total number of players : 10
Seat 1: Player1 ( $43.70)
Seat 2: Player2 ( $24)
Seat 3: Player3 ( $16.95)
Seat 4: Player4 ( $46.85)
Seat 5: Player5 ( $9.25)
Seat 6: Player6 ( $25.40)
Seat 7: Player7 ( $18.25)
Seat 8: Fnord ( $24.50)
Seat 9: Player9 ( $24.50)
Seat 10: Player10 ( $24.05)
Player4 posts small blind (0.25)
Player5 posts big blind (0.50)
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to Fnord [ Ad, Ac ]
Player6 calls (0.50)
Player3: hours
Player7 folds.
Fnord raises (2) to 2
Player9 folds.
Player10 folds.
Player1 folds.
Player2 folds.
Player3 folds.
Player4 folds.
Player5 folds.
Player6 calls (1.50)
** Dealing Flop ** : [ 4s, Jc, Ah ]
Player6 checks.
Fnord checks.
** Dealing Turn ** : [ 6s ]
Player6 checks.
Fnord checks.
** Dealing River ** : [ 8h ]
Player6 bets (6)
Fnord raises (12) to 12
Player6 raises (12) to 18
Fnord raises (10.50) to 22.50
Fnord is all-In.
Player6 calls (4.50)
Creating Main Pot with $47.30 with Fnord
** Summary **
Main Pot: $47.30 | | Rake: $2.45
Board: [ 4s Jc Ah 6s 8h ]
Player1 balance $43.70, didn't bet (folded)
Player2 balance $24, didn't bet (folded)
Player3 balance $16.95, didn't bet (folded)
Player4 balance $46.60, lost $0.25 (folded)
Player5 balance $8.75, lost $0.50 (folded)
Player6 balance $48.20, bet $24.50, collected $47.30, net +$22.80 [ 5s 7c ] [ a straight, four to eight -- 8h,7c,6s,5s,4s ]
Player7 balance $18.25, didn't bet (folded)
Fnord balance $0, lost $24.50 [ Ad Ac ] [ three of a kind, aces -- Ad,Ac,Ah,Jc,8h ]
Player9 balance $24.50, didn't bet (folded)
Player10 balance $24.05, didn't bet (folded)
|
|
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
Fnord
|
02-22-2004, 08:36 PM
Post subject: Trap backfires...
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,336
|
|
Would you put him on anything other than a smaller set or two pair?
***** Hand History for Game 408924645 *****
0/0 TexasHTGameTable (NL) - Sun Feb 22 15:49:37 EST 2004
Table Card Room Table 3038 (Real Money) -- Seat 3 is the button
Total number of players : 10
Seat 1: Player1 ( $43.70)
Seat 2: Player2 ( $24)
Seat 3: Player3 ( $16.95)
Seat 4: Player4 ( $46.85)
Seat 5: Player5 ( $9.25)
Seat 6: Player6 ( $25.40)
Seat 7: Player7 ( $18.25)
Seat 8: Fnord ( $24.50)
Seat 9: Player9 ( $24.50)
Seat 10: Player10 ( $24.05)
Player4 posts small blind (0.25)
Player5 posts big blind (0.50)
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to Fnord [ Ad, Ac ]
Player6 calls (0.50)
Player3: hours
Player7 folds.
Fnord raises (2) to 2
Player9 folds.
Player10 folds.
Player1 folds.
Player2 folds.
Player3 folds.
Player4 folds.
Player5 folds.
Player6 calls (1.50)
** Dealing Flop ** : [ 4s, Jc, Ah ]
Player6 checks.
Fnord checks.
** Dealing Turn ** : [ 6s ]
Player6 checks.
Fnord checks.
** Dealing River ** : [ 8h ]
Player6 bets (6)
Fnord raises (12) to 12
Player6 raises (12) to 18
Fnord raises (10.50) to 22.50
Fnord is all-In.
Player6 calls (4.50)
Creating Main Pot with $47.30 with Fnord
** Summary **
Main Pot: $47.30 | | Rake: $2.45
Board: [ 4s Jc Ah 6s 8h ]
Player1 balance $43.70, didn't bet (folded)
Player2 balance $24, didn't bet (folded)
Player3 balance $16.95, didn't bet (folded)
Player4 balance $46.60, lost $0.25 (folded)
Player5 balance $8.75, lost $0.50 (folded)
Player6 balance $48.20, bet $24.50, collected $47.30, net +$22.80 [ 5s 7c ] [ a straight, four to eight -- 8h,7c,6s,5s,4s ]
Player7 balance $18.25, didn't bet (folded)
Fnord balance $0, lost $24.50 [ Ad Ac ] [ three of a kind, aces -- Ad,Ac,Ah,Jc,8h ]
Player9 balance $24.50, didn't bet (folded)
Player10 balance $24.05, didn't bet (folded)
|
|
|
|
Fnord
|
02-22-2004, 08:36 PM
Post subject: Trap backfires...
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,336
|
|
Would you put him on anything other than a smaller set or two pair?
***** Hand History for Game 408924645 *****
0/0 TexasHTGameTable (NL) - Sun Feb 22 15:49:37 EST 2004
Table Card Room Table 3038 (Real Money) -- Seat 3 is the button
Total number of players : 10
Seat 1: Player1 ( $43.70)
Seat 2: Player2 ( $24)
Seat 3: Player3 ( $16.95)
Seat 4: Player4 ( $46.85)
Seat 5: Player5 ( $9.25)
Seat 6: Player6 ( $25.40)
Seat 7: Player7 ( $18.25)
Seat 8: Fnord ( $24.50)
Seat 9: Player9 ( $24.50)
Seat 10: Player10 ( $24.05)
Player4 posts small blind (0.25)
Player5 posts big blind (0.50)
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to Fnord [ Ad, Ac ]
Player6 calls (0.50)
Player3: hours
Player7 folds.
Fnord raises (2) to 2
Player9 folds.
Player10 folds.
Player1 folds.
Player2 folds.
Player3 folds.
Player4 folds.
Player5 folds.
Player6 calls (1.50)
** Dealing Flop ** : [ 4s, Jc, Ah ]
Player6 checks.
Fnord checks.
** Dealing Turn ** : [ 6s ]
Player6 checks.
Fnord checks.
** Dealing River ** : [ 8h ]
Player6 bets (6)
Fnord raises (12) to 12
Player6 raises (12) to 18
Fnord raises (10.50) to 22.50
Fnord is all-In.
Player6 calls (4.50)
Creating Main Pot with $47.30 with Fnord
** Summary **
Main Pot: $47.30 | | Rake: $2.45
Board: [ 4s Jc Ah 6s 8h ]
Player1 balance $43.70, didn't bet (folded)
Player2 balance $24, didn't bet (folded)
Player3 balance $16.95, didn't bet (folded)
Player4 balance $46.60, lost $0.25 (folded)
Player5 balance $8.75, lost $0.50 (folded)
Player6 balance $48.20, bet $24.50, collected $47.30, net +$22.80 [ 5s 7c ] [ a straight, four to eight -- 8h,7c,6s,5s,4s ]
Player7 balance $18.25, didn't bet (folded)
Fnord balance $0, lost $24.50 [ Ad Ac ] [ three of a kind, aces -- Ad,Ac,Ah,Jc,8h ]
Player9 balance $24.50, didn't bet (folded)
Player10 balance $24.05, didn't bet (folded)
|
|
|
|
Fnord
|
02-22-2004, 08:36 PM
Post subject: Trap backfires...
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,336
|
|
Would you put him on anything other than a smaller set or two pair?
***** Hand History for Game 408924645 *****
0/0 TexasHTGameTable (NL) - Sun Feb 22 15:49:37 EST 2004
Table Card Room Table 3038 (Real Money) -- Seat 3 is the button
Total number of players : 10
Seat 1: Player1 ( $43.70)
Seat 2: Player2 ( $24)
Seat 3: Player3 ( $16.95)
Seat 4: Player4 ( $46.85)
Seat 5: Player5 ( $9.25)
Seat 6: Player6 ( $25.40)
Seat 7: Player7 ( $18.25)
Seat 8: Fnord ( $24.50)
Seat 9: Player9 ( $24.50)
Seat 10: Player10 ( $24.05)
Player4 posts small blind (0.25)
Player5 posts big blind (0.50)
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to Fnord [ Ad, Ac ]
Player6 calls (0.50)
Player3: hours
Player7 folds.
Fnord raises (2) to 2
Player9 folds.
Player10 folds.
Player1 folds.
Player2 folds.
Player3 folds.
Player4 folds.
Player5 folds.
Player6 calls (1.50)
** Dealing Flop ** : [ 4s, Jc, Ah ]
Player6 checks.
Fnord checks.
** Dealing Turn ** : [ 6s ]
Player6 checks.
Fnord checks.
** Dealing River ** : [ 8h ]
Player6 bets (6)
Fnord raises (12) to 12
Player6 raises (12) to 18
Fnord raises (10.50) to 22.50
Fnord is all-In.
Player6 calls (4.50)
Creating Main Pot with $47.30 with Fnord
** Summary **
Main Pot: $47.30 | | Rake: $2.45
Board: [ 4s Jc Ah 6s 8h ]
Player1 balance $43.70, didn't bet (folded)
Player2 balance $24, didn't bet (folded)
Player3 balance $16.95, didn't bet (folded)
Player4 balance $46.60, lost $0.25 (folded)
Player5 balance $8.75, lost $0.50 (folded)
Player6 balance $48.20, bet $24.50, collected $47.30, net +$22.80 [ 5s 7c ] [ a straight, four to eight -- 8h,7c,6s,5s,4s ]
Player7 balance $18.25, didn't bet (folded)
Fnord balance $0, lost $24.50 [ Ad Ac ] [ three of a kind, aces -- Ad,Ac,Ah,Jc,8h ]
Player9 balance $24.50, didn't bet (folded)
Player10 balance $24.05, didn't bet (folded)
|
|
|
|
Fnord
|
02-22-2004, 08:36 PM
Post subject: Trap backfires...
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,336
|
|
Would you put him on anything other than a smaller set or two pair?
***** Hand History for Game 408924645 *****
0/0 TexasHTGameTable (NL) - Sun Feb 22 15:49:37 EST 2004
Table Card Room Table 3038 (Real Money) -- Seat 3 is the button
Total number of players : 10
Seat 1: Player1 ( $43.70)
Seat 2: Player2 ( $24)
Seat 3: Player3 ( $16.95)
Seat 4: Player4 ( $46.85)
Seat 5: Player5 ( $9.25)
Seat 6: Player6 ( $25.40)
Seat 7: Player7 ( $18.25)
Seat 8: Fnord ( $24.50)
Seat 9: Player9 ( $24.50)
Seat 10: Player10 ( $24.05)
Player4 posts small blind (0.25)
Player5 posts big blind (0.50)
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to Fnord [ Ad, Ac ]
Player6 calls (0.50)
Player3: hours
Player7 folds.
Fnord raises (2) to 2
Player9 folds.
Player10 folds.
Player1 folds.
Player2 folds.
Player3 folds.
Player4 folds.
Player5 folds.
Player6 calls (1.50)
** Dealing Flop ** : [ 4s, Jc, Ah ]
Player6 checks.
Fnord checks.
** Dealing Turn ** : [ 6s ]
Player6 checks.
Fnord checks.
** Dealing River ** : [ 8h ]
Player6 bets (6)
Fnord raises (12) to 12
Player6 raises (12) to 18
Fnord raises (10.50) to 22.50
Fnord is all-In.
Player6 calls (4.50)
Creating Main Pot with $47.30 with Fnord
** Summary **
Main Pot: $47.30 | | Rake: $2.45
Board: [ 4s Jc Ah 6s 8h ]
Player1 balance $43.70, didn't bet (folded)
Player2 balance $24, didn't bet (folded)
Player3 balance $16.95, didn't bet (folded)
Player4 balance $46.60, lost $0.25 (folded)
Player5 balance $8.75, lost $0.50 (folded)
Player6 balance $48.20, bet $24.50, collected $47.30, net +$22.80 [ 5s 7c ] [ a straight, four to eight -- 8h,7c,6s,5s,4s ]
Player7 balance $18.25, didn't bet (folded)
Fnord balance $0, lost $24.50 [ Ad Ac ] [ three of a kind, aces -- Ad,Ac,Ah,Jc,8h ]
Player9 balance $24.50, didn't bet (folded)
Player10 balance $24.05, didn't bet (folded)
|
|
|
|
Fnord
|
02-22-2004, 08:36 PM
Post subject: Trap backfires...
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,336
|
|
Would you put him on anything other than a smaller set or two pair?
***** Hand History for Game 408924645 *****
0/0 TexasHTGameTable (NL) - Sun Feb 22 15:49:37 EST 2004
Table Card Room Table 3038 (Real Money) -- Seat 3 is the button
Total number of players : 10
Seat 1: Player1 ( $43.70)
Seat 2: Player2 ( $24)
Seat 3: Player3 ( $16.95)
Seat 4: Player4 ( $46.85)
Seat 5: Player5 ( $9.25)
Seat 6: Player6 ( $25.40)
Seat 7: Player7 ( $18.25)
Seat 8: Fnord ( $24.50)
Seat 9: Player9 ( $24.50)
Seat 10: Player10 ( $24.05)
Player4 posts small blind (0.25)
Player5 posts big blind (0.50)
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to Fnord [ Ad, Ac ]
Player6 calls (0.50)
Player3: hours
Player7 folds.
Fnord raises (2) to 2
Player9 folds.
Player10 folds.
Player1 folds.
Player2 folds.
Player3 folds.
Player4 folds.
Player5 folds.
Player6 calls (1.50)
** Dealing Flop ** : [ 4s, Jc, Ah ]
Player6 checks.
Fnord checks.
** Dealing Turn ** : [ 6s ]
Player6 checks.
Fnord checks.
** Dealing River ** : [ 8h ]
Player6 bets (6)
Fnord raises (12) to 12
Player6 raises (12) to 18
Fnord raises (10.50) to 22.50
Fnord is all-In.
Player6 calls (4.50)
Creating Main Pot with $47.30 with Fnord
** Summary **
Main Pot: $47.30 | | Rake: $2.45
Board: [ 4s Jc Ah 6s 8h ]
Player1 balance $43.70, didn't bet (folded)
Player2 balance $24, didn't bet (folded)
Player3 balance $16.95, didn't bet (folded)
Player4 balance $46.60, lost $0.25 (folded)
Player5 balance $8.75, lost $0.50 (folded)
Player6 balance $48.20, bet $24.50, collected $47.30, net +$22.80 [ 5s 7c ] [ a straight, four to eight -- 8h,7c,6s,5s,4s ]
Player7 balance $18.25, didn't bet (folded)
Fnord balance $0, lost $24.50 [ Ad Ac ] [ three of a kind, aces -- Ad,Ac,Ah,Jc,8h ]
Player9 balance $24.50, didn't bet (folded)
Player10 balance $24.05, didn't bet (folded)
|
|
|
|
!Luck
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Under a bridge
Posts: 1,367
|
|
I am sorry man that really sucked. Better luck next time. Luck?
|
|
|
|
!Luck
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Under a bridge
Posts: 1,367
|
|
I am sorry man that really sucked. Better luck next time. Luck?
|
|
|
|
!Luck
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Under a bridge
Posts: 1,367
|
|
I am sorry man that really sucked. Better luck next time. Luck?
|
|
|
|
!Luck
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Under a bridge
Posts: 1,367
|
|
I am sorry man that really sucked. Better luck next time. Luck?
|
|
|
|
!Luck
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Under a bridge
Posts: 1,367
|
|
I am sorry man that really sucked. Better luck next time. Luck?
|
|
|
|
!Luck
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Under a bridge
Posts: 1,367
|
|
I am sorry man that really sucked. Better luck next time. Luck?
|
|
|
|
jmrogers7
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,112
|
|
That truly sucks. For him to play those cards in any position other than being on the blinds (which he wasn't), and especially in that table position was simply the mark of a bad player and you were unfortunately victimized.
My hope is that you stuck around long enough to take his stack away from him later on because you know that if he played hands like that in that table position, that if you didn't end up taking his stack, someone would have.
|
|
"The urge to gamble is so universal and it's practice is so pleasurable, that I assume it must be evil." - Heywood Broun
|
|
jmrogers7
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,112
|
|
That truly sucks. For him to play those cards in any position other than being on the blinds (which he wasn't), and especially in that table position was simply the mark of a bad player and you were unfortunately victimized.
My hope is that you stuck around long enough to take his stack away from him later on because you know that if he played hands like that in that table position, that if you didn't end up taking his stack, someone would have.
|
|
"The urge to gamble is so universal and it's practice is so pleasurable, that I assume it must be evil." - Heywood Broun
|
|
jmrogers7
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,112
|
|
That truly sucks. For him to play those cards in any position other than being on the blinds (which he wasn't), and especially in that table position was simply the mark of a bad player and you were unfortunately victimized.
My hope is that you stuck around long enough to take his stack away from him later on because you know that if he played hands like that in that table position, that if you didn't end up taking his stack, someone would have.
|
|
"The urge to gamble is so universal and it's practice is so pleasurable, that I assume it must be evil." - Heywood Broun
|
|
jmrogers7
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,112
|
|
That truly sucks. For him to play those cards in any position other than being on the blinds (which he wasn't), and especially in that table position was simply the mark of a bad player and you were unfortunately victimized.
My hope is that you stuck around long enough to take his stack away from him later on because you know that if he played hands like that in that table position, that if you didn't end up taking his stack, someone would have.
|
|
"The urge to gamble is so universal and it's practice is so pleasurable, that I assume it must be evil." - Heywood Broun
|
|
jmrogers7
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,112
|
|
That truly sucks. For him to play those cards in any position other than being on the blinds (which he wasn't), and especially in that table position was simply the mark of a bad player and you were unfortunately victimized.
My hope is that you stuck around long enough to take his stack away from him later on because you know that if he played hands like that in that table position, that if you didn't end up taking his stack, someone would have.
|
|
"The urge to gamble is so universal and it's practice is so pleasurable, that I assume it must be evil." - Heywood Broun
|
|
jmrogers7
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,112
|
|
That truly sucks. For him to play those cards in any position other than being on the blinds (which he wasn't), and especially in that table position was simply the mark of a bad player and you were unfortunately victimized.
My hope is that you stuck around long enough to take his stack away from him later on because you know that if he played hands like that in that table position, that if you didn't end up taking his stack, someone would have.
|
|
"The urge to gamble is so universal and it's practice is so pleasurable, that I assume it must be evil." - Heywood Broun
|
|
gutshot
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: lemonade was a popular drink and it still is
Posts: 608
|
|
WTF was he doing limping with that kind of garbage UTG? Sucks dude.
|
|
-jay
"i think the biggest leak in my game is using 2nd level thinking against players who can't think on the first level." -Renton
|
|
gutshot
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: lemonade was a popular drink and it still is
Posts: 608
|
|
WTF was he doing limping with that kind of garbage UTG? Sucks dude.
|
|
-jay
"i think the biggest leak in my game is using 2nd level thinking against players who can't think on the first level." -Renton
|
|
gutshot
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: lemonade was a popular drink and it still is
Posts: 608
|
|
WTF was he doing limping with that kind of garbage UTG? Sucks dude.
|
|
-jay
"i think the biggest leak in my game is using 2nd level thinking against players who can't think on the first level." -Renton
|
|
gutshot
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: lemonade was a popular drink and it still is
Posts: 608
|
|
WTF was he doing limping with that kind of garbage UTG? Sucks dude.
|
|
-jay
"i think the biggest leak in my game is using 2nd level thinking against players who can't think on the first level." -Renton
|
|
gutshot
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: lemonade was a popular drink and it still is
Posts: 608
|
|
WTF was he doing limping with that kind of garbage UTG? Sucks dude.
|
|
-jay
"i think the biggest leak in my game is using 2nd level thinking against players who can't think on the first level." -Renton
|
|
gutshot
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: lemonade was a popular drink and it still is
Posts: 608
|
|
WTF was he doing limping with that kind of garbage UTG? Sucks dude.
|
|
-jay
"i think the biggest leak in my game is using 2nd level thinking against players who can't think on the first level." -Renton
|
|
Fnord
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,336
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jmrogers7
That truly sucks. For him to play those cards in any position other than being on the blinds (which he wasn't), and especially in that table position was simply the mark of a bad player and you were unfortunately victimized.
My hope is that you stuck around long enough to take his stack away from him later on because you know that if he played hands like that in that table position, that if you didn't end up taking his stack, someone would have.
|
Nope, he ran like a punk. Probably realized what I tried to do to him. I'll get his screen name for ya'll...
It's bell02
|
|
|
|
Fnord
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,336
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jmrogers7
That truly sucks. For him to play those cards in any position other than being on the blinds (which he wasn't), and especially in that table position was simply the mark of a bad player and you were unfortunately victimized.
My hope is that you stuck around long enough to take his stack away from him later on because you know that if he played hands like that in that table position, that if you didn't end up taking his stack, someone would have.
|
Nope, he ran like a punk. Probably realized what I tried to do to him. I'll get his screen name for ya'll...
It's bell02
|
|
|
|
Fnord
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,336
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jmrogers7
That truly sucks. For him to play those cards in any position other than being on the blinds (which he wasn't), and especially in that table position was simply the mark of a bad player and you were unfortunately victimized.
My hope is that you stuck around long enough to take his stack away from him later on because you know that if he played hands like that in that table position, that if you didn't end up taking his stack, someone would have.
|
Nope, he ran like a punk. Probably realized what I tried to do to him. I'll get his screen name for ya'll...
It's bell02
|
|
|
|
Fnord
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,336
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jmrogers7
That truly sucks. For him to play those cards in any position other than being on the blinds (which he wasn't), and especially in that table position was simply the mark of a bad player and you were unfortunately victimized.
My hope is that you stuck around long enough to take his stack away from him later on because you know that if he played hands like that in that table position, that if you didn't end up taking his stack, someone would have.
|
Nope, he ran like a punk. Probably realized what I tried to do to him. I'll get his screen name for ya'll...
It's bell02
|
|
|
|
Fnord
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,336
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jmrogers7
That truly sucks. For him to play those cards in any position other than being on the blinds (which he wasn't), and especially in that table position was simply the mark of a bad player and you were unfortunately victimized.
My hope is that you stuck around long enough to take his stack away from him later on because you know that if he played hands like that in that table position, that if you didn't end up taking his stack, someone would have.
|
Nope, he ran like a punk. Probably realized what I tried to do to him. I'll get his screen name for ya'll...
It's bell02
|
|
|
|
Fnord
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,336
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jmrogers7
That truly sucks. For him to play those cards in any position other than being on the blinds (which he wasn't), and especially in that table position was simply the mark of a bad player and you were unfortunately victimized.
My hope is that you stuck around long enough to take his stack away from him later on because you know that if he played hands like that in that table position, that if you didn't end up taking his stack, someone would have.
|
Nope, he ran like a punk. Probably realized what I tried to do to him. I'll get his screen name for ya'll...
It's bell02
|
|
|
|
jmrogers7
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,112
|
|
All I can say is
Rest assured, he'll get his in the long run!
|
|
"The urge to gamble is so universal and it's practice is so pleasurable, that I assume it must be evil." - Heywood Broun
|
|
jmrogers7
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,112
|
|
All I can say is
Rest assured, he'll get his in the long run!
|
|
"The urge to gamble is so universal and it's practice is so pleasurable, that I assume it must be evil." - Heywood Broun
|
|
jmrogers7
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,112
|
|
All I can say is
Rest assured, he'll get his in the long run!
|
|
"The urge to gamble is so universal and it's practice is so pleasurable, that I assume it must be evil." - Heywood Broun
|
|
jmrogers7
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,112
|
|
All I can say is
Rest assured, he'll get his in the long run!
|
|
"The urge to gamble is so universal and it's practice is so pleasurable, that I assume it must be evil." - Heywood Broun
|
|
jmrogers7
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,112
|
|
All I can say is
Rest assured, he'll get his in the long run!
|
|
"The urge to gamble is so universal and it's practice is so pleasurable, that I assume it must be evil." - Heywood Broun
|
|
jmrogers7
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,112
|
|
All I can say is
Rest assured, he'll get his in the long run!
|
|
"The urge to gamble is so universal and it's practice is so pleasurable, that I assume it must be evil." - Heywood Broun
|
|
Ragingguitarist18
|
|
Straight
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 235
|
|
he called a 2 dollar raise with a 5 7 offsuit? I don't even know what to say after that.
|
|
|
|
Ragingguitarist18
|
|
Straight
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 235
|
|
he called a 2 dollar raise with a 5 7 offsuit? I don't even know what to say after that.
|
|
|
|
Ragingguitarist18
|
|
Straight
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 235
|
|
he called a 2 dollar raise with a 5 7 offsuit? I don't even know what to say after that.
|
|
|
|
Ragingguitarist18
|
|
Straight
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 235
|
|
he called a 2 dollar raise with a 5 7 offsuit? I don't even know what to say after that.
|
|
|
|
Ragingguitarist18
|
|
Straight
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 235
|
|
he called a 2 dollar raise with a 5 7 offsuit? I don't even know what to say after that.
|
|
|
|
Ragingguitarist18
|
|
Straight
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 235
|
|
he called a 2 dollar raise with a 5 7 offsuit? I don't even know what to say after that.
|
|
|
|
Fnord
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,336
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ragingguitarist18
he called a 2 dollar raise with a 5 7 offsuit? I don't even know what to say after that.
|
It's already well established that on Party Poker 25o is a perfectly acceptable to limp in UTG with. So I guess by that logic then 57o is worth calling $1.5 more with. *lol*
P.S. The resident scrub is the first one to 100 posts....
|
|
|
|
Fnord
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,336
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ragingguitarist18
he called a 2 dollar raise with a 5 7 offsuit? I don't even know what to say after that.
|
It's already well established that on Party Poker 25o is a perfectly acceptable to limp in UTG with. So I guess by that logic then 57o is worth calling $1.5 more with. *lol*
P.S. The resident scrub is the first one to 100 posts....
|
|
|
|
Fnord
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,336
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ragingguitarist18
he called a 2 dollar raise with a 5 7 offsuit? I don't even know what to say after that.
|
It's already well established that on Party Poker 25o is a perfectly acceptable to limp in UTG with. So I guess by that logic then 57o is worth calling $1.5 more with. *lol*
P.S. The resident scrub is the first one to 100 posts....
|
|
|
|
Fnord
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,336
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ragingguitarist18
he called a 2 dollar raise with a 5 7 offsuit? I don't even know what to say after that.
|
It's already well established that on Party Poker 25o is a perfectly acceptable to limp in UTG with. So I guess by that logic then 57o is worth calling $1.5 more with. *lol*
P.S. The resident scrub is the first one to 100 posts....
|
|
|
|
Fnord
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,336
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ragingguitarist18
he called a 2 dollar raise with a 5 7 offsuit? I don't even know what to say after that.
|
It's already well established that on Party Poker 25o is a perfectly acceptable to limp in UTG with. So I guess by that logic then 57o is worth calling $1.5 more with. *lol*
P.S. The resident scrub is the first one to 100 posts....
|
|
|
|
Fnord
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,336
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ragingguitarist18
he called a 2 dollar raise with a 5 7 offsuit? I don't even know what to say after that.
|
It's already well established that on Party Poker 25o is a perfectly acceptable to limp in UTG with. So I guess by that logic then 57o is worth calling $1.5 more with. *lol*
P.S. The resident scrub is the first one to 100 posts....
|
|
|
|
Xianti
|
|
Administrator
Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: facebook.com/xianti
Posts: 5,289
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Fnord
P.S. The resident scrub is the first one to 100 posts....
|
Yes! And look... that gets you a "Flush!"
Thanks for your continued support and contributions, Brian.
|
|
|
|
Xianti
|
|
Administrator
Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: facebook.com/xianti
Posts: 5,289
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Fnord
P.S. The resident scrub is the first one to 100 posts....
|
Yes! And look... that gets you a "Flush!"
Thanks for your continued support and contributions, Brian.
|
|
|