Poker Forum

Over 1,247,000 Posts!

Subscribe to FTR web feed
Already Registered?      Username:    Password:   Remember      Forgot Password
  >    > 

Simplest situation ever - plan?

  
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-18-2009, 01:55 AM     Post subject: Simplest situation ever - plan? #1 (permalink)  
Guest

Posts: n/a
This is one of those spots that come up all the time and i'm curious what people's overall plans are.
Assume Villain is an mediocre-to-good TAG.
Obv we're ahead of his cbet range (vs most players), but are clueless on later streets.
What's the plan from flop onwards, particularly if villain bets turn as well?
How do things change if we're not IP?


PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $1.00 BB (9 handed) - Poker-Stars Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com

BB ($100)
UTG ($50)
UTG+1 ($126.95)
MP1 ($98.50)
MP2 ($54.40)
MP3 ($100)
CO ($105.15)
Hero (Button) ($102.85)
SB ($119.85)

Preflop: Hero is Button with 7, 7
3 folds, MP2 calls $1, 1 fold, CO bets $5, Hero calls $5, 2 folds, MP2 calls $4

Flop: ($16.50) Q, 5, Q (3 players)
MP2 checks, CO bets $11, Hero folds, 1 fold

Total pot: $16.50 | Rake: $0.80
Reply With Quote
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
bigspenda73
Old 03-18-2009, 02:46 AM #2 (permalink)  
bigspenda73's Avatar
Straight Flush

Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Pwnsylvania
Posts: 7,546
bigspenda73 will become famous soon enoughbigspenda73 will become famous soon enough
how are we ahead of his cbetting range especially when he bets into 2 players?
Reply With Quote
elipsesjeff
Old 03-18-2009, 03:08 AM #3 (permalink)  
elipsesjeff's Avatar
Moderator

Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 4,900
elipsesjeff is an unknown quantity at this point
If you think you're ahead of his cbetting range then call obv.


Check out my videos at Grinderschool.com

More Full Ring NLHE Cash videos than ANY other poker training site. Training starts at $10/month.
 
Reply With Quote
Deanglow
Old 03-18-2009, 05:29 AM #4 (permalink)  
Deanglow's Avatar
Moderator

Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: lol
Posts: 2,443
Deanglow is on a distinguished road
plan is to call flop and fold a lot of turns
 
Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2009, 09:49 AM #5 (permalink)  
Guest

Posts: n/a
this particular player, because he cbets often and this is a board he can represent vs one player (me) who folds a lot to cbets, and an oop player he can put a lot of pressure on.

If the turn is a total blank like the 3c and he bets again, are we folding?
What about a broadway card?
Reply With Quote
Renton
Old 03-18-2009, 09:58 AM #6 (permalink)  
Renton's Avatar
Straight Flush

Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
Posts: 5,991
Renton will become famous soon enough
there should be a threshold of pocket pairs that you should be calling/folding here, and its somewhere in the 66-99 range, depending on tons of things
Reply With Quote
daven
Old 03-20-2009, 12:04 AM #7 (permalink)  
Straight Flush

Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: soaking up ethanol, moving on up
Posts: 5,813
daven will become famous soon enough
you can fold here, you can call here. Depends on reads, reads, reads.
What would you do here with 55? AQ?
 
Reply With Quote
Stacks
Old 03-20-2009, 05:34 AM #8 (permalink)  
Stacks's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Im opedipus bitch, the original balla.
Posts: 2,608
Stacks will become famous soon enoughStacks will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by daven
you can fold here, you can call here. Depends on reads, reads, reads.
What would you do here with 55? AQ?
Why is it relevant what you would do with 55/AQ?
Reply With Quote
daven
Old 03-20-2009, 12:26 PM #9 (permalink)  
Straight Flush

Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: soaking up ethanol, moving on up
Posts: 5,813
daven will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by XxStacksxX
Quote:
Originally Posted by daven
you can fold here, you can call here. Depends on reads, reads, reads.
What would you do here with 55? AQ?
Why is it relevant what you would do with 55/AQ?
isn't floating partly about repping monsters? 55/AQ are monsters here, would he call those? etc.
 
Reply With Quote
Stacks
Old 03-20-2009, 01:20 PM #10 (permalink)  
Stacks's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Im opedipus bitch, the original balla.
Posts: 2,608
Stacks will become famous soon enoughStacks will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by daven
Quote:
Originally Posted by XxStacksxX
Quote:
Originally Posted by daven
you can fold here, you can call here. Depends on reads, reads, reads.
What would you do here with 55? AQ?
Why is it relevant what you would do with 55/AQ?
isn't floating partly about repping monsters? 55/AQ are monsters here, would he call those? etc.
I would call 55/AQ here. However, if I was to raise them on this flop, does that mean I should be raising 77 also? I obviously wouldn't think so. So while floating/bluffing is about repping credible hands, 77 in this spot doesn't necessarily fall into the category of hands that you want to "bluff" with (imo).

But I do have a few thoughts on this, and similar, situations. I personally would be calling the majority of my continuing range on this flop. And I don't think I would be "bluffing" all that often. So if I call this flop, my hand strength hasn't become transparent. However, if villain checks the turn (as I would think he does a decent % of the time), that's when I feel my hand becomes quite apparent. I mean I would obviously want to bet my nut hands, such as AQ, 55, etc. And I don't think betting 77 on the turn would be all that beneficial, as we likely don't get value and he probably c/calls a good portion of his made hands (TT,JJ,etc.).

So I think when villain checks the turn, my hand strength is going to be really transparent, and relatively easy to play against. As I'm not floating all that often here in a multiway pot, when I bet the turn it would be either nut hand or bluffs/semibluffs, which would be weighted more towards nut hands. And when I check this back on the turn my range is going to be weighted greatly towards marginal hands with SD value.

So what does this mean? Should we be checking back some of our stronger hands in order to make our range less transparent? Should be betting some of our more marginal hands on the turn, intending to continue the bluff on good rivers (like betting 66 with the intention of barreling good rivers so villain folds TT, JJ, maybe KK/AA)? Thoughts?
Reply With Quote
BankItDrew
Old 03-29-2009, 10:25 AM #11 (permalink)  
BankItDrew's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Losing Prop Bets
Posts: 2,789
BankItDrew will become famous soon enough
*BUMP*


Girlfriend:
Why are the werewolves more important than living life?!

Girlfriend:
Are you on the forums doing the werewolves again?

Girlfriend:
Soo... you forgot to run that errand, but you had time to werewolf? Wtf?
 
Reply With Quote
Reply
Latest Poker News
dlbarlowe Old 06-01-2012, 11:03 AM    White House Responds to Poker Players Alliance's Petition
After receiving a petition scripted by the Poker Players Alliance approximately eight months ago, the Obama administration recently issued a response prepared by Brian Deese, the Deputy Director of th ...

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 11:53 PM.


FTR Testimonials

All content
© FlopTurnRiver.com
Advertising  |   Partners  |   Testimonials  |   T&C  |   Contact Us  |   FTR News & Press  |   Site Map  |   Search FTR

Full Tilt  |   Titan Poker  |   UltimateBet  |   Poker Stars  |   Ladbrokes Bonus  |   Sportsbook  |   Cake Poker  

Play Texas Holdem Online, Online Texas Holdem Strategy, & Poker Forum
This is not a gambling website.