|
mxiu
|
07-16-2006, 09:36 PM
Post subject: A quick hand from a recent session
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 982
|
|
Villain is 32/11/2.17
My image is 20/9/2.4
Villain has been fairly fishy, and I recently got a string of 5 group 1 hands in a row, which made me seem like a maniac at the time.
PokerStars Game #5580483202: Hold'em No Limit ($1/$2) - 2006/07/16 - 17:27:10 (ET)
Table 'Aguilar' 9-max Seat #6 is the button
Seat 1: Crocodilo ($80.30 in chips)
Seat 2: jono1972 ($209.50 in chips)
Seat 3: Pace Car ($38.75 in chips)
Seat 4: Majin Legacy ($341.05 in chips)
Seat 5: BigBluffn83 ($397 in chips)
Seat 6: SuperLucky2 ($235.70 in chips)
Seat 7: TheOneSC ($126 in chips)
Seat 8: grayzee1 ($167.70 in chips)
TheOneSC: posts small blind $1
grayzee1: posts big blind $2
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to Majin Legacy [Jh Jc]
Crocodilo: folds
jono1972: folds
Pace Car: folds
Majin Legacy: raises $6 to $8
BigBluffn83: folds
SuperLucky2: folds
TheOneSC: calls $7
millsy101 joins the table at seat #9
grayzee1: folds
*** FLOP *** [8c 5s 5h]
TheOneSC: checks
Majin Legacy: bets $12
TheOneSC: calls $12
*** TURN *** [8c 5s 5h] [9c]
TheOneSC: checks
Majin Legacy: bets $25
TheOneSC: raises $81 to $106 and is all-in
Majin Legacy...?
|
|
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
Renton
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
Posts: 5,991
|
|
This is tough.
He could have picked up a big draw and be semibluffing. He could also have hit two pair with 89. He could also have a 5.
Its pretty close, and reads are very needed here. Without them I think I fold. Calling is neutral EV here against most peoples ranges.
|
|
|
|
Lodogg
|
|
Straight
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Stealing your C-bet
Posts: 199
|
|
It smells like a set to me.
|
|
|
|
mxiu
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 982
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Renton
This is tough.
He could have picked up a big draw and be semibluffing. He could also have hit two pair with 89. He could also have a 5.
Its pretty close, and reads are very needed here. Without them I think I fold. Calling is neutral EV here against most peoples ranges.
|
Yeah, for the most part, he seemed fairly fishy, which was why I was leaning toward a call. Neutral EV against most people's ranges you think?
|
|
|
|
Miffed22001
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Marry Me Cheryl!!!
Posts: 8,181
|
|
why bet the flop?
You can check here or on the turn when its a seeming rag and call a decent river bet/bet turn.
Betting both of the first two streets is a mistake here imo.
Pot control
Dont bet if you cant stand being raised.
|
|
|
|
mxiu
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 982
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Miffed22001
why bet the flop?
You can check here or on the turn when its a seeming rag and call a decent river bet/bet turn.
Betting both of the first two streets is a mistake here imo.
|
Well, betting the flop is a must here just in case villain is sitting on overs. Don't want to let them get there for free?
I bet the turn because I can still get a call from lesser hands like 98, draws, etc.
|
|
|
|
Miffed22001
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Marry Me Cheryl!!!
Posts: 8,181
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mxiu
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Miffed22001
why bet the flop?
You can check here or on the turn when its a seeming rag and call a decent river bet/bet turn.
Betting both of the first two streets is a mistake here imo.
|
Well, betting the flop is a must here just in case villain is sitting on overs. Don't want to let them get there for free?
I bet the turn because I can still get a call from lesser hands like 98, draws, etc.
|
think of it this way.
A lot of hands are going to think, meh on the turn and put you on air and push on a board you dont want to see a raise on, unless you have a solid read. TT could be doing this and you cant really call without that read.
If you exercise pot control and check the turn you can call a dcent river bet on almost any card and be happy you played it right without getting in a mess. If its an over and you lose at showdown just know the other 3 outta 4 times you pick off a bluff here mostly on the river from a wide range you are way ahead of.
Played this way we are stacking off with a hand we would have liked to showdown with a lot and won a fair % of the time.
Value vs pot control in this pot and pot control rules but only IMO.
fwiw, id call this push anyway.
You are either way behind or have a hand with 2 outs getting value bet to death on the river where you are going to make a fair amount of money in showing down.
|
|
|
|
Renton
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
Posts: 5,991
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Miffed22001
Betting both of the first two streets is a mistake here imo.
|
I disagree. Leading both streets is highly necessary. You can check the turn against some players, but not against fish. I sometimes check the turn to increase my value on a blank river, considering a lot of weak hands will look me up.
|
|
|
|
Renton
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
Posts: 5,991
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mxiu
Neutral EV against most people's ranges you think?
|
At best.
|
|
|
|
mxiu
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 982
|
|
fwiw?
I understand pot control. I'm not saying checking behind on the turn is a bad play, I just had a reason to bet it. I don't agree with checking the flop however.
|
|
|
|
Miffed22001
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Marry Me Cheryl!!!
Posts: 8,181
|
|
Quote:
|
I disagree. Leading both streets is highly necessary. You can check the turn against some players, but not against fish. I sometimes check the turn to increase my value on a blank river, considering a lot of weak hands will look me up
|
We also lose value against 2nd best hands that would showdown against us for a decent price, perhasp even bet into us if we check behind on the turn. Aware players dump a pair or any pp on the turn the way we played it, or play it this way and shove us off a hand we could showdown.
I prefer showing this down against a fish at a good value price than getting in a big messy pot (stacking off) when we could be cooked like the sunday roast :P
|
|
|
|
mxiu
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 982
|
|
No one explained what fwiw stood for. >_<
While on the topic of not knowing what stuff means, what do all of you mean when you say... "for meta-game purposes"?
|
|
|
|
Miffed22001
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Marry Me Cheryl!!!
Posts: 8,181
|
|
fwiw= for what its worth.
|
|
|
|
mxiu
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 982
|
|
Meta-game?
FYP?
|
|
|
|
Miffed22001
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Marry Me Cheryl!!!
Posts: 8,181
|
|
fyp- fixed your post
metagame i think refers to long term purposes or something
|
|
|
|
Renton
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
Posts: 5,991
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Miffed22001
fyp- fixed your post
metagame i think refers to long term purposes or something
|
metagame refers to second and third level thinking and table image.
Second level thinking is "what do they think I have" and third level thinking is "what do they think I think they have."
When you do something "for metagame purposes" you are making a play that may not be correct in the abstract of things, but it might set you up for +EV against this player later. e.g. checking flops with good hands occasionally.
|
|
|
|
a500lbgorilla
|
|
JESUS TAKE THE KEYBOARD
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: This room is a good place to be
Posts: 8,379
|
|
metagame is what you do to affect how your opponents react to you in the future.
So if you make a stubborn call down and they see you showdown with 3rd pair, they'll probably shy away from trying to run you over.
|

Smithers, use the amnesia ray.
You mean the revolver, sir?
Precisely.
|
|
mxiu
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 982
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Renton
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Miffed22001
fyp- fixed your post
metagame i think refers to long term purposes or something
|
metagame refers to second and third level thinking and table image.
Second level thinking is "what do they think I have" and third level thinking is "what do they think I think they have."
When you do something "for metagame purposes" you are making a play that may not be correct in the abstract of things, but it might set you up for +EV against this player later. e.g. checking flops with good hands occasionally.
|
I had a feeling that's what it meant. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
bdawg56kg
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Honolulu
Posts: 1,201
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Miffed22001
why bet the flop?
You can check here or on the turn when its a seeming rag and call a decent river bet/bet turn.
|
Sure flop is obv a WA/WB situation in most cases, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't bet. A LOT of worse hands will call us, making a flop bet very +EV. Plus if he has 2 overs we definitely don't want him to see the turn for free.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Miffed22001
Betting both of the first two streets is a mistake here imo.
Pot control
|
I think this is just wrong. How do you think we make money off loose passive calling stations? By checking and practicing pot control?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Miffed22001
Dont bet if you cant stand being raised.
|
How can you be serious? We bet the turn because we are ahead of a large part of his c/c range for the flop, and also to not give a free card to any draws he may have picked up. He check-raises, so now it's time to re-evaluate, and against a lot of bad, predictable opponents, OP's line is 100% optimal, b/c most players will not c/r you on the turn with a bluff or semi-bluff, so we get max value when he has a worst hand and lose the least when he has us beat.
OP: I think I'd fold here, but like Renton said, it's close.
|
|
|
|
mxiu
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 982
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bdawg56kg
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Miffed22001
why bet the flop?
You can check here or on the turn when its a seeming rag and call a decent river bet/bet turn.
|
Sure flop is obv a WA/WB situation in most cases, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't bet. A LOT of worse hands will call us, making a flop bet very +EV. Plus if he has 2 overs we definitely don't want him to see the turn for free.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Miffed22001
Betting both of the first two streets is a mistake here imo.
Pot control
|
I think this is just wrong. How do you think we make money off loose passive calling stations? By checking and practicing pot control?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Miffed22001
Dont bet if you cant stand being raised.
|
How can you be serious? We bet the turn because we are ahead of a large part of his c/c range for the flop, and also to not give a free card to any draws he may have picked up. He check-raises, so now it's time to re-evaluate, and against a lot of bad, predictable opponents, OP's line is 100% optimal, b/c most players will not c/r you on the turn with a bluff or semi-bluff, so we get max value when he has a worst hand and lose the least when he has us beat.
OP: I think I'd fold here, but like Renton said, it's close.
|
Is there much of a difference if we had QQ-AA instead of JJ?
|
|
|
|
bdawg56kg
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Honolulu
Posts: 1,201
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mxiu
Is there much of a difference if we had QQ-AA instead of JJ?
|
If you played it exactly the same, then there's almost no difference. But if we are talking about checking either the flop or turn for pot control, or to induce a river bluff or value-bet, then it makes a considerable difference. I would be much more willing to check with AA/KK rather than QQ/JJ because of overcards.
|
|
|