|
daven
|
05-28-2009, 01:15 PM
Post subject: QQ overpair passive line, check river behind vs good reg?
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: soaking up ethanol, moving on up
Posts: 5,814
|
|
villain is a multi-tabling reg with a 4ptBB/100 winrate at 100 and 200nl over a big sample size - i have this in my pop-up notes as some kind of warning. Over a huge sample he runs 15-12, but 9-8 from ep stretching to 25-20 on the button. He has an exploitably low cbet of 55% and doesn't tangle too hard with regs.
Pre-flop is mostly a 3-bet, but sometimes not. His fold to 3bet is low and he 4-bets about never, meaning that i should probably 3-bet here and be well ahead of his calling range. Flop is dry enough for me to look pretty strong, but after the turn check-call I think he's aiming for showdown, suggests to me that he's on 99/JJ+/AdKd/AdQd cos he's not missing value on TT here. Once he checks river I have options. He's folding his FDs and 99 for sure. He may call with JJ+?
betting here seems obvious, but i doubt there is any value to be had, i'm basically turning my hand into a bluff against the top of his range cos i already have good showdown value.
Full Tilt No-Limit Hold'em, $1.00 BB (9 handed) - Full-Tilt Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com
SB ($100)
BB ($67.95)
UTG ($107.55)
UTG+1 ($112)
MP1 ($132.30)
MP2 ($100)
MP3 ($188.15)
Hero (CO) ($100)
Button ($58.65)
Preflop: Hero is CO with Q , Q
UTG bets $4, 4 folds, Hero calls $4, 3 folds
Flop: ($9.50) 3 , 10 , 7 (2 players)
UTG bets $6, Hero calls $6
Turn: ($21.50) 2 (2 players)
UTG checks, Hero bets $14, UTG calls $14
River: ($49.50) 10 (2 players)
UTG checks, bluff my overpair?!?
|
|
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
|
|
|
|
$28, let HIM find a way to pay you off
the hands he opens, 66+, AQs+, AK may ALL call you
but would he check the turn here with KK+? I mean, does he expect you to float him and continue on the river so he can call you down and say HA! I CAUGHT YOUR BLUFF
there's really nothing that beats you other than like a set that he plays that way to c/r the river
|
|
|
|
Extremophile
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Stackton
Posts: 451
|
|
He might have hit trip 10s on the river Pot looks big enough to stop betting. take that pot rather than risking more.
correction: that would have been quads.
|
|
|
|
badgers
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Spewing
Posts: 3,372
|
|
Whatever you do, if you think betting the river would be a bluff then ofmg do not bet! I think this can easily be JJ+ as you have suggested, a cbet of 55% could be indicative of him bluffcatching a lot with surprisingly strong hands.
It really depends on the history between you, if he thinks you are capable of floating/ firing river w/ air then he's more likely to be doing this with 88/99 intending to call. If you have a nitty image then simply check behind, there's no shame in checking back an overpair.
|
3k post - Return of the blog!
|
|
oskar
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: in ur accounts... confiscating ur funz
Posts: 2,452
|
|
I already said it in the crosspost at the BC... I really don't see anyone playing AA, KK, TT that way - unless you have a player note that sais he does. He can't have Tx. He might hero-call with AKd, AQd, and he might call with 88, 99, JJ - which I'm pretty sure is most of his range at this point.
I would bet ~25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
i fold but if he was aggressive raise
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$5
|
|
|
|
bigspenda73
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Pwnsylvania
Posts: 7,546
|
|
I just love how you say he has an exploitably low cbet % but it one of the biggest winners at 100 and 200nl.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah actually i was wondering how you would exploit a 55% cbet, i mean maybe there's a way but since i assume his checking range is somewhat balanced it doesn't sound that bad. I'd think 80% cbet would be easier to exploit.
giving up whenever he cbets unless you have a nuttish hand?
|
|
|
|
Parasurama
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: DMT
Posts: 820
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bigspenda73
I just love how you say he has an exploitably low cbet % but it one of the biggest winners at 100 and 200nl.
|
This is exactly what I thought. The only way I can see to exploit this is just cold-call way more hands in position against him but that invites its own problems, i.e. getting squeezed sucks.
Be open to the idea that cbetting 55% is actually a better way to play your limit.
|
|
|
|
Deanglow
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: lol
Posts: 2,443
|
|
yeah just bet $32 and hope he calls but this is thinner than you guys think
|
|
|