|
Skeeno
|
12-08-2007, 04:56 AM
Post subject: New ring site required.
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Norfolk, UK
Posts: 364
|
|
Hello all,
Okay I predominantly play on Stars mainly because the majority of players play on their and I like the tourneys/SNGs what not. However due to a few family issues I'm going to have to cut down my playing time, to compensate this I'm going to concentrate pretty much solely on full ring at likely 10nl because I completely suck at it. Anyways I'm not going to play ring on Stars mainly because I think there's plenty of fishier sites to attack and my performance on their has been appalling, anyone got any pearls of wisdom regarding a fishier/easier site? I've played on Party, Pacific and Betfair previously and Pacific left me speechless at times. Betfair was some time ago so they may have improved but I guess playing ring on Stars is not an -ev move. Any ideas?
I've got approx $360 - with about $160 remaining on Stars for the odd 180 man and what not. So any bonuses etc with $200 be appreciated.
|
|
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
jyms
|
|
Tilting Mod
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,836
|
|
Full ring? probably Party then. No RB but lots of tables and fish to make up for it. UB is not bad at 10NL FR, about 10 or 12 tables but 25NL sucks since the BBJ tables start at $50NL.
|
|
|
|
bbqsquirrel
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 260
|
|
PS.com software is too slick to give up on
|
|
|
|
Deanglow
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: lol
Posts: 2,443
|
|
Quote:
|
to compensate this I'm going to concentrate pretty much solely on full ring at likely 10nl because I completely suck at it.
|
I laughed really hard at this.
Whatever you site you play 10NL on it doesn't matter a whole lot. It is easy everywhere. If you are not in the U.S. play Party Poker.
|
|
|
|
Skeeno
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Norfolk, UK
Posts: 364
|
|
Thing is I want to improve my ring game stats and ideally I see the cutback in playing time as an ideal way to do this, I'm not giving up on PS because my results on their in SNGs/low MTTs have been positive recently with a decent upswing at low levels, but ring game wise I dunno everytime I play there I make donk move after donk move . . . lol.
Cheers for the replies guys.
|
|
|
|
checkraiseit
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 4
|
|
I agree stars can be tough... "A" game only for the full ring...even the $10 tables (as much as $10 tables can be).
You might wanna give Bodog a try. Folks at the $10 love stacking off with top pair, any kicker. Just play premium hands, be willing to fold TPTK, and you should do well.
|
|
|
|
Skeeno
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Norfolk, UK
Posts: 364
|
|
Cheers mate. I'll have a look at Bodog, also going to do a bit of bonus whoring to check out a couple of other sites.
|
|
|
|
Robb
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 3,073
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Trainer_jyms
UB is not bad at 10NL FR, about 10 or 12 tables but 25NL sucks since the BBJ tables start at $50NL.
|
I'll second this. Just moved over from 6-max (which I have beaten comfortably for 3 months) to FR. Whoa. Talk about fish. Jeez, it's awe-inspiring levels of super-donk-fish-ness.
I hit a set on a Kxx board. Guy bets out, I rr, he's all-in. Okay. I'm there. Blanks, and then he's showing KT offsuit.
I raised about five limpers to $.75 from the button with TT. Three of them call, plus the big blind. Flop is AT6. I'm all-in with two guests, one who's hit A6o for two pair, one who's got AJ. If only they had been full stacks instead of halfs...but you can't have everything.
Go play UB NL10 FR now!!!
|
|
|