|
dsaxton
|
06-27-2005, 02:18 AM
Post subject: My best call ever.
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 2,667
|
|
I think this is possibly the best call I've ever made. Check it out:
PokerStars Game #1980221390: Hold'em No Limit ($1/$2) - 2005/06/26 - 22:12:07 (ET)
Table 'Trinculo' Seat #8 is the button
Seat 1: CoachMarshal ($269 in chips)
Seat 2: gutdog33 ($92.10 in chips)
Seat 4: DiscoDennis ($192.80 in chips)
Seat 5: SLIPPY622 ($281.85 in chips)
Seat 6: dsaxton ($245.80 in chips)
Seat 7: crackleback ($209.80 in chips)
Seat 8: LINDY_C ($70 in chips)
Seat 9: cryptofex ($269 in chips)
cryptofex: posts small blind $1
CoachMarshal: posts big blind $2
20nCrAzY: sits out
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to dsaxton [Jd Ah]
gutdog33: calls $2
DiscoDennis: folds
SLIPPY622: folds
dsaxton: raises $6 to $8
crackleback: folds
LINDY_C: folds
cryptofex: folds
CoachMarshal: folds
gutdog33: calls $6
*** FLOP *** [5s 4s 2h]
gutdog33: checks
dsaxton: bets $15
gutdog33: calls $15
*** TURN *** [5s 4s 2h] [3h]
gutdog33: checks
dsaxton: bets $25
gutdog33: calls $25
*** RIVER *** [5s 4s 2h 3h] [As]
gutdog33: bets $44.10 and is all-in
dsaxton: calls $44.10
*** SHOW DOWN ***
gutdog33: shows [Qs Ks] (a flush, Ace high)
dsaxton: mucks hand
gutdog33 collected $184.20 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $187.20 | Rake $3
Board [5s 4s 2h 3h As]
Seat 1: CoachMarshal (big blind) folded before Flop
Seat 2: gutdog33 showed [Qs Ks] and won ($184.20) with a flush, Ace high
Seat 4: DiscoDennis folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 5: SLIPPY622 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 6: dsaxton mucked [Jd Ah]
Seat 7: crackleback folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 8: LINDY_C (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 9: cryptofex (small blind) folded before Flop
|
|
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
a500lbgorilla
|
|
JESUS TAKE THE KEYBOARD
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: This room is a good place to be
Posts: 8,379
|
|
And this is the best reply i've ever posted!
-'rilla
|

Smithers, use the amnesia ray.
You mean the revolver, sir?
Precisely.
|
|
spino1i
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: 25/50's f'in hard!
Posts: 893
|
|
push all-in the turn, and you wouldnt have had a problem
|
|
BR now: $106900
Playing now: $10/10/20 - $20/40 NL live, $10/20 NL full ring online, $10/20 NL 6-max online, $20/40 FL 6-max online, $100/200 FL live
Goal: $125000 for $25/50 NL live
|
|
a500lbgorilla
|
|
JESUS TAKE THE KEYBOARD
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: This room is a good place to be
Posts: 8,379
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by spino1i
push all-in the turn, and you wouldnt have had a problem
|
Just lead out AI?
-'rilla
|

Smithers, use the amnesia ray.
You mean the revolver, sir?
Precisely.
|
|
spino1i
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: 25/50's f'in hard!
Posts: 893
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by a500lbgorilla
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by spino1i
push all-in the turn, and you wouldnt have had a problem
|
Just lead out AI?
-'rilla
|
Well its dangerous I agree, but to be honest, if the other guy has a 6, theres no way your really getting away from this one. I mean what if the villain raised him to 50$ on the turn? Could he have really laid his hand down? It was much more likely villain had an ace as well instead of 6, and your really pot-comittted by this point (villain would only have 17 dollars left on top of his 42 dollar raise).
So my philisophy is, if your gonna lose all your money anyway to a 6, might as well give the draw (the only other thing your gonna run into really) bad odds to call.
|
|
BR now: $106900
Playing now: $10/10/20 - $20/40 NL live, $10/20 NL full ring online, $10/20 NL 6-max online, $20/40 FL 6-max online, $100/200 FL live
Goal: $125000 for $25/50 NL live
|
|
ville18
|
|
Straight
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Yo mama
Posts: 223
|
|
gc!
|
|
|
|
H Dogg
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Fairfax, VA
Posts: 75
|
|
Way to go!
|
|
{Solicitation removed by Xianti}
|
|
DimitriT
|
|
Full House
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 614
|
|
It was a god call right up to the river, when it turned into a very bad call.
If you had just checked and folded or at least checked and called the river, you would have played it very well.
It's too bad the As showed (probably gave you a sense that you weren't up against AXs). But a check is definitely the right play there.
|
|
|
|
a500lbgorilla
|
|
JESUS TAKE THE KEYBOARD
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: This room is a good place to be
Posts: 8,379
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by DimitriT
It was a god call right up to the river, when it turned into a very bad call.
If you had just checked and folded or at least checked and called the river, you would have played it very well.
It's too bad the As showed (probably gave you a sense that you weren't up against AXs). But a check is definitely the right play there.
|
Can he fold the river against action that it either a flush or a bluff? It comes down to the op. If its 50/50 between flush and bluff, you gotta fold.
-'rilla
|

Smithers, use the amnesia ray.
You mean the revolver, sir?
Precisely.
|
|
Zangief
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 370
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by a500lbgorilla
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by DimitriT
It was a god call right up to the river, when it turned into a very bad call.
If you had just checked and folded or at least checked and called the river, you would have played it very well.
It's too bad the As showed (probably gave you a sense that you weren't up against AXs). But a check is definitely the right play there.
|
Can he fold the river against action that it either a flush or a bluff? It comes down to the op. If its 50/50 between flush and bluff, you gotta fold.
-'rilla
|
Seems like if it's 50/50 between flush and bluff, you have to call. With $140 in the pot after his opponent's bet and $44 to call, if the odds of a bluff are above about 1-in-3, this should be +EV. Unless I'm missing something?
|
|
|
|
spino1i
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: 25/50's f'in hard!
Posts: 893
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Zangief
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by a500lbgorilla
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by DimitriT
It was a god call right up to the river, when it turned into a very bad call.
If you had just checked and folded or at least checked and called the river, you would have played it very well.
It's too bad the As showed (probably gave you a sense that you weren't up against AXs). But a check is definitely the right play there.
|
Can he fold the river against action that it either a flush or a bluff? It comes down to the op. If its 50/50 between flush and bluff, you gotta fold.
-'rilla
|
Seems like if it's 50/50 between flush and bluff, you have to call. With $140 in the pot after his opponent's bet and $44 to call, if the odds of a bluff are above about 1-in-3, this should be +EV. Unless I'm missing something?
|
You're forgetting something. If he's bluffing its only a split pot.. he doesnt win. So assuming he already has half his chips in the pot (which seems to be the case) then:
The guy is bluffing: He wins net 0$
The guy has the flush: He loses x$ + amount he already has in the pot where x$ is the amount of dollars bet by the guy.
Or he folds: He loses half of what the pot is currently at.
The guy bet 44$, and the pot stood at about 90$ i think (i might be wrong on that), so lets say thats roughly close to half the amount the guy bet.
So he wins 0$ if he calls the bluff, loses 90$ net if he calls a flush.
If he folds he loses 45$ net.
So its worth a call if you think there's over a 50% chance of the guy bluffing.
|
|
BR now: $106900
Playing now: $10/10/20 - $20/40 NL live, $10/20 NL full ring online, $10/20 NL 6-max online, $20/40 FL 6-max online, $100/200 FL live
Goal: $125000 for $25/50 NL live
|
|
Zangief
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 370
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by spino1i
You're forgetting something. If he's bluffing its only a split pot.. he doesnt win. So assuming he already has half his chips in the pot (which seems to be the case) then:
The guy is bluffing: He wins net 0$
The guy has the flush: He loses x$ + amount he already has in the pot where x$ is the amount of dollars bet by the guy.
Or he folds: He loses half of what the pot is currently at.
The guy bet 44$, and the pot stood at about 90$ i think (i might be wrong on that), so lets say thats roughly close to half the amount the guy bet.
So he wins 0$ if he calls the bluff, loses 90$ net if he calls a flush.
If he folds he loses 45$ net.
So its worth a call if you think there's over a 50% chance of the guy bluffing.
|
Yes, I forgot the split pot. But the way you describe it doesn't really make sense. The money you've put in the pot is not yours anymore.
The math just changes from call $44 to win $140 (call if he bluffs more often than about 1-in-3 here) to call $44 to win $70 (call if he bluffs more often than about 1-in-1.5 here).
So it's actually only worth a call if the guy bluffs here about 2/3 of the time. I guess this would take a pretty strong read.
|
|
|
|
spino1i
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: 25/50's f'in hard!
Posts: 893
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Zangief
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by spino1i
You're forgetting something. If he's bluffing its only a split pot.. he doesnt win. So assuming he already has half his chips in the pot (which seems to be the case) then:
The guy is bluffing: He wins net 0$
The guy has the flush: He loses x$ + amount he already has in the pot where x$ is the amount of dollars bet by the guy.
Or he folds: He loses half of what the pot is currently at.
The guy bet 44$, and the pot stood at about 90$ i think (i might be wrong on that), so lets say thats roughly close to half the amount the guy bet.
So he wins 0$ if he calls the bluff, loses 90$ net if he calls a flush.
If he folds he loses 45$ net.
So its worth a call if you think there's over a 50% chance of the guy bluffing.
|
Yes, I forgot the split pot. But the way you describe it doesn't really make sense. The money you've put in the pot is not yours anymore.
The math just changes from call $44 to win $140 (call if he bluffs more often than about 1-in-3 here) to call $44 to win $70 (call if he bluffs more often than about 1-in-1.5 here).
So it's actually only worth a call if the guy bluffs here about 2/3 of the time. I guess this would take a pretty strong read.
|
When I say net I mean from the beginning of the hand. Your end result from start of hand to end of hand. You could subtract the money he's already put in and do it all over again, its just simpler for me.
|
|
BR now: $106900
Playing now: $10/10/20 - $20/40 NL live, $10/20 NL full ring online, $10/20 NL 6-max online, $20/40 FL 6-max online, $100/200 FL live
Goal: $125000 for $25/50 NL live
|
|
Zangief
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 370
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by spino1i
When I say net I mean from the beginning of the hand. Your end result from start of hand to end of hand. You could subtract the money he's already put in and do it all over again, its just simpler for me.
|
But on the river, he only has 1 decision to make and it is separate from all the other decisions that put money into the pot. His choice is to call or fold. If he calls and loses, he will lose $44. If he calls and splits, he will win $92.
I actually had that wrong up above. If he calls for $44 and splits, he will win $92 ... giving him about 1-in-2 to catch a bluff. Blurgh.
|
|
|
|
Element187
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 802
|
|
i fold preflop
|
"Imagine how it would be to be at the top Making cash money, Go and tour all around the world, Tell stories about all the young girls." - The Prodigy - Girls
|