Poker Forum
|
Over 1,247,000 Posts!
|
|
|
|
EricE
|
08-15-2005, 04:16 PM
Post subject: KK played passive.
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 894
|
|
PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $0.10 BB (9 handed) FTR converter on zerodivide.cx
CO ($3)
Button ($3.10)
SB ($2.75)
BB ($8.35)
UTG ($3.80)
UTG+1 ($13.60)
MP1 ($17.95)
MP2 ($2.65)
Hero ($10)
Preflop: Hero is MP3 with A , Q .
UTG calls $0.10, UTG+1 raises to $0.3, 2 folds, Hero raises to $0.5, 4 folds, UTG calls $0.40, UTG+1 calls $0.20.
Flop: ($1.65) Q , 4 , J (3 players)
UTG checks, UTG+1 checks, Hero bets $0.7, UTG folds, UTG+1 calls $0.70.
Turn: ($3.05) T (2 players)
UTG+1 checks, Hero bets $1.3, UTG+1 calls $1.30.
River: ($5.65) 5 (2 players)
UTG+1 checks, Hero bets $3, UTG+1 calls $3.
Final Pot: $11.65
UTG+1 is check/calling me on all streets. He is just not sure who is winning here. He took a long time to call the river bet. Any indication I am beat here? I put him on AJ or KQ, I was wrong.
|
|
Stakes: Playing $0.10/$0.25 NL
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
SteveO
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 755
|
|
He took a long time to call becaue you may have had AK, AA , QQ or JJ based on your re-raise preflop.
He raised 3 x's BB in early position and got re-raised. His play was terribly passive in this example, but effective because you did all the betting for him. He feared AA or QQ but you did not make is so expensive that he was forced to go away or reveal his strength. To the extent that you bet all along pot sized was good.
You didn't necissarily do anything wrong here aside from the re-raise w/ AQ. When you face an EP raise, especially against a passive opponent, you are going to want to think about mucking the AQ, AJ etc., but it's not wrong to re-raise once in a while to mix it up and avoid being predictable.
Next time, think about overbetting to find out if you are beat. His preflop raise could easily be AK, AA, KK or QQ. Any one of those hands could potentially check call you down and it would only be a mistake with the AK.
Let me ask you this, had you overbet the flop for $2.5o or 3 would you have folded that hand to a re-raise from him?
|
|
Send lawyers, guns and money - the sh*t has hit the fan!
|
|
EricE
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 894
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SteveO
He took a long time to call because you may have had AK, AA , QQ or JJ based on your re-raise preflop.
He raised 3 x's BB in early position and got re-raised. His play was terribly passive in this example, but effective because you did all the betting for him. He feared AA or QQ but you did not make is so expensive that he was forced to go away or reveal his strength. To the extent that you bet all along pot sized was good.
You didn't necessarily do anything wrong here aside from the re-raise w/ AQ. When you face an EP raise, especially against a passive opponent, you are going to want to think about mucking the AQ, AJ etc., but it's not wrong to re-raise once in a while to mix it up and avoid being predictable.
Next time, think about over-betting to find out if you are beat. His preflop raise could easily be AK, AA, KK or QQ. Any one of those hands could potentially check call you down and it would only be a mistake with the AK.
Let me ask you this, had you overbet the flop for $2.5o or 3 would you have folded that hand to a re-raise from him?
|
OK, don’t min raise. Got it.
The advice I looked up for AQo in LP facing a raise is to fold against a tight raiser or re-raise otherwise. I had no read on this guy so I reraised. If he had reraised me PF I would have folded. If he had reraised on the flop I would have folded. Heck, I remember being this passive with KK when I first started out. Oh well, this is one of those live and learn situations. I think most of the time the KK is going to play more aggressively here. I certainly would have expected a lead out bet on the flop. I am not sure what I could do better here other than consider that I might be beat. Hehe
Thanks for your comments.
|
|
Stakes: Playing $0.10/$0.25 NL
|
|
Fnord
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,334
|
|
For what it's worth, I would bet bigger on the flop + turn, then probably check behind on the river.
|
|
|
|
SinkRox
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Brighton, UK
Posts: 624
|
|
what can you do!? I was waiting for any info telling me I was beat, without it I put him on TP.. i even gave him the rest of his stack at the river...
** Game ID 293448395 starting - 2005-08-15 22:22:34
** Daytona [Hold 'em] (0.10|0.20 No Limit - Cash Game) Real Money
- SinkRox sitting in seat 1 with $19.40 [Dealer]
- Peester16 sitting in seat 2 with $11.27
- 4MEA1 sitting in seat 3 with $13.89 [Sitting out]
- Taurus0001 sitting in seat 4 with $20.57
- RubberSoul sitting in seat 5 with $12.91
- sham3n sitting in seat 6 with $17.75
- JGildo sitting in seat 8 with $43.35
- Seebass sitting in seat 9 with $10.40
- rss999 sitting in seat 10 with $1.80
Peester16 posted the small blind - $0.10
Taurus0001 posted the big blind - $0.20
rss999 posted to play - $0.20
** Dealing card to SinkRox: Queen of Hearts, Queen of Diamonds
RubberSoul raised - $0.40
sham3n folded
JGildo folded
Seebass folded
rss999 folded
SinkRox raised - $1.20
Peester16 folded
Taurus0001 folded
RubberSoul called - $1.20
** Dealing the flop: Jack of Diamonds, 9 of Hearts, 4 of Spades
RubberSoul bet - $0.60
SinkRox raised - $2.40
RubberSoul called - $2.40
** Dealing the turn: 2 of Clubs
RubberSoul checked
SinkRox bet - $4.00
RubberSoul called - $4.00
** Dealing the river: 5 of Diamonds
RubberSoul checked
SinkRox bet - $5.40
RubberSoul went all-in - $5.31
RubberSoul shows: King of Hearts, King of Spades
RubberSoul wins $25.02 from the main pot
End of game 293448395
|
|
Experimenting - 200NL 5max.
"They say that dreams are real only as long as they last. Couldn't you say the same thing about life?" Waking life
|
|
Latest Poker News
|
|
KoRnholio
|
05-26-2012, 03:08 PM Australia Legalized Online Poker coming up in next 6 to 12 Months
|
|
According to an email sent out by Mark Bryan, a gaming analyst at Merrill Lynch, the Australian government plans to legalize online poker sometime in the next six to 12 months. This move will coincide ...
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:43 PM.
|