|
daven
|
06-26-2010, 04:01 AM
Post subject: KK in 3b pot deepish 100nl
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: soaking up ethanol, moving on up
Posts: 5,807
|
|
villain is 37-15 over a smallish sample, his fold to 3b is low (1/4 so far). Pre-flop once he calls i put him on AQ+/suited broadways/KQo/22-AA. Flop and he's check-calling the flush draws in his range, sets, and overpairs. His fold to cbet is low (2/9) and he hasn't shown any crazy raise cbet tendencies (0%). Turn Q is kinda meh for me, i'm not sure he's calling enough for a turn bet to be better than checking it back. If i bet, what sorta sizing and is it clear bet-fold?
$0.50/$1 No Limit Holdem
PokerStars
9 Players
Hand Conversion Powered by weaktight.com
Stacks:
UTG eqxxyinoon ($240.30)
UTG+1 Schxxxwatt7 ($254.75)
MP1 dest-roxxxy89 ($101.65)
MP2 MihxxxaikFor ($295.75)
MP3 gordxxxitour ($100)
CO Hero ($160.15)
BTN Kihxxxog ($106.50)
SB bigxxxd10125 ($100)
BB LaixxxxSee ($106.50)
Pre-Flop: ($1.50, 9 players) Hero is CO 
3 folds, MihaikFor raises to $5, 1 fold, Hero raises to $15, 3 folds, MihaikFor calls $10
Flop: ($31.50, 2 players)
MihaikFor checks, Hero bets $20, MihaikFor calls $20
Turn: ($71.50, 2 players)
MihaikFor checks, Hero bets $35,
|
|
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
ZwiFT
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Valuebet/fold
Posts: 778
|
|
not a biggie, id make it like 16 pf doesnt matter so much tho.
Id prolly end up taking a pot control line on the turn and call any missed rivers for his range. Or thin vb if he checks something like underpairs back to us. I guess if u play it this way u gotta B/F turn and river, and vb very small on the river! If he calls and shove missed river now ur gonna have a hard time calling
|
|
|
|
Outlaw
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,033
|
|
I don't mind the turn bet size to induce.
I am not sure what checking back accomplishes.. seems like we are missing a lot of value. I am not of fan of pot controlling when we are committed anyways.
|
|
|
|
ZwiFT
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Valuebet/fold
Posts: 778
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Outlaw
I don't mind the turn bet size to induce.
I am not sure what checking back accomplishes.. seems like we are missing a lot of value. I am not of fan of pot controlling when we are committed anyways.
|
Committed ? wat
|
|
|
|
dranger7070
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Wake up in the mornin feelin' like P. Diddy
Posts: 2,524
|
|
lol bet/bet/bet plz
Sizing is fine since river is an ez shove no matter what, but you could make it $45-$55
|
|
|
|
oskar
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: in ur accounts... confiscating ur funz
Posts: 2,452
|
|
I'd bet bigger on the turn. I think your bet sizing looks scarier to his bluff catchers because that's the kind of bet donks make when they have TT, JJ on that board... and most of his range can't beat that.
Against an unnkown I think it's a bet/fold. - Even more of a reason not to bet something that might induce a bluff raise.
|
|
The strengh of a hero is defined by the weakness of his villains.
|
|
Outlaw
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,033
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZwiFT
Committed ? wat
|
25% of the starting stack is in the pot with an overpair in a 3-bet pot.. if we aren't committed here, when are we?
|
|
|
|
Illfavor
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Denton, TX
Posts: 1,152
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Outlaw
25% of the starting stack is in the pot with an overpair in a 3-bet pot.. if we aren't committed here, when are we?
|
I think commitment is slightly more conditional than that.
|
|
|
|
bikes
|
|
a hot damn mess
Administrator
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,455
|
|
29/f
|
|
|