|
LeFou
|
07-19-2004, 03:38 AM
Post subject: I'm sorry, but is this happening to me for a reason?
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 2,361
|
|
Synopsis:
yeah, i call a little bet from the SB with AXs. But on the flop I've got four to the nut flush, top pair, and a backdoor straight. $18 to call on a $34 pot.
And I get wiped out. Again.
I need to know -- yes or no -- Am I supposed to fold to a big bet unless it's in the bag? 'Cause I keep hearing advice about making calls on the odds and it'll pay off in the long run, and I keep getting wiped out. Details below. NuWere is me.
Seat 1: checksplayed ($20.40 in chips)
Seat 2: acemanxx ($44.20 in chips)
Seat 3: microterf ($11.45 in chips)
Seat 4: 2AcesHigh ($19.50 in chips)
Seat 5: Making83 ($18.60 in chips)
Seat 7: NuWere ($25 in chips)
Seat 9: olivert ($24.75 in chips)
Seat 10: rulamj ($15 in chips)
ANTES/BLINDS
NuWere posts blind ($0.25).
PRE-FLOP
olivert bets $1, rulamj folds, checksplayed calls $1, acemanxx calls $1, microterf folds, 2AcesHigh folds, Making83 folds, NuWere calls $0.75.
FLOP [board cards JH,2H,AS ]
NuWere bets $6, olivert bets $23.75 and is all-in, checksplayed folds, acemanxx folds, NuWere calls $17.75.
TURN [board cards JH,2H,AS,6D ]
RIVER [board cards JH,2H,AS,6D,4C ]
|
|
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
LeFou
|
07-19-2004, 03:41 AM
Post subject: by the way
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 2,361
|
|
based on his early position preflop raise, i put him on a big pair -- kings or queens. Should I have been watching for jacks?
|
|
|
|
Fnord
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,336
|
|
What exactly is your hand?
|
|
|
|
Toasty
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: England UK
Posts: 1,522
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Fnord
What exactly is your hand?
|
hehe was thinking that myself, hard to give an answer without it.
|
|
Poker is all about the long long long long long long long term . . .
Barney's back . . . back again . . .
|
|
Legendash
|
|
Full House
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Crypto 6max 100NL
Posts: 611
|
|
he said he's drawing to the nut flush so it must be Ah Xh
|
|
"[This theory] is only useful for helping to calculate your luck odds. If you have a good read that you have a numerical advantage against your opponent, that your hand is "luckier"..."
Copyright, Youngdro 2007.
|
|
LeFou
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 2,361
|
|
sorry
Ah4h
|
|
|
|
Toasty
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: England UK
Posts: 1,522
|
|
I think this is an easy fold on the flop.
|
|
Poker is all about the long long long long long long long term . . .
Barney's back . . . back again . . .
|
|
Humphrind
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 1,887
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by LeFou
sorry
Ah4h
|
So what did the other guy have?
You missed your flush, but caught 2 pair.
Did he have trips? A bigger 2 pair?
|
|
I don't know what they have to say
It makes no difference anyway.
Whatever it is...
I'm against it.
|
|
maxxscam
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 734
|
|
he said the other guy had jacks
|
|
|
|
johnnyawe
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1,064
|
|
Sorry dude, but you had a nut flush draw and a top pair that was obviously outkicked. Forget the crap about runner runner straight draw. Do you realize that some people call an inside straight draw a "miracle" straight draw? I don't even know what the nickname is for a runner runner straight draw.
With the other guy betting the way he did, you need to put him on AK, AQ, or AJ. He ended up having JJ, which would have caught me by surprise, but its still an easy fold. With the guy betting like that, you have to figure he had top pair high kicker or better. You were clearly 35% to win and you called a bet that was 400% of the pot.
The call was definitely not in line with the pot odds. Granted, he may have been semi-bluffing a King high flush draw if he was a maniac player, but that is unlikely.
|
|
|
|
Humphrind
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 1,887
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by maxxscam
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by LeFou
Should I have been watching for jacks?
|
he said the other guy had jacks
|
Is this were he said it? This is the only place I saw a hint toward what the other guy had.
I wouldn't have put the other guy on Js specifically, but I would have feared the trips. There is no made straight or flush on the board, and he obviously doesn't have the nut flush draw, you do. But this guy is confident in something. He's not short-stacked in a tournament. He's not going to bluff when you already overbet the pot. He pushed all in because he thought you'd call.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by TheNatural
I don't even know what the nickname is for a runner runner straight draw.
|
I don't know is this is official, but I call it a lucky-ass-son-of-a-bitch straight. Same name for runner-runner flush or runner-runner anything.
|
|
I don't know what they have to say
It makes no difference anyway.
Whatever it is...
I'm against it.
|
|
Fnord
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,336
|
|
I wouldn't lay this down either given the size of the pot relative to amount of money you had left. Tough beat.
|
|
|
|
johnnyawe
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1,064
|
|
One other thing: it was not $18 to call a $34 pot. Nuwhere was only eligible for $28 in the main pot.
So that is calling 64% of the pot.
Right?
|
|
|
|
Fnord
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,336
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by TheNatural
One other thing: it was not $18 to call a $34 pot. Nuwhere was only eligible for $28 in the main pot.
So that is calling 64% of the pot.
Right?
|
The pot math here is f'd up. The final pot is certainly larger than $34 or some other number is off.
Given the stack sizes, flush+ (in this case with top pair) is a reasonable hand to take to the felt or I have a big leak in my game.
|
|
|
|
koolmoe
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Drowning in prosperity
Posts: 1,279
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by TheNatural
One other thing: it was not $18 to call a $34 pot. Nuwhere was only eligible for $28 in the main pot.
So that is calling 64% of the pot.
Right?
|
NuWere had olivert covered (if only by a quarter), so he was eligible for the entire pot, which was $33.75 before he called the all-in.
|
|
|
|
johnnyawe
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1,064
|
|
phhh.
nevermind. I have no clue what I'm talking about.
Nuwhere: ignore everything I've said.
Except the stuff about the miracle of miracles straight draw.
|
|
|
|
michael1123
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Rochester Hills, MI
Posts: 1,720
|
|
JJ vs. A4h with that flop:
JJ had a 69.6% chance to win. This is less than the possibility of a flush coming because of the odds of the board pairing and making a boat.
Lets say you put him on A high kicker instead, though.
AK vs. A4h with that flop:
AK has a 53% chance of winning, A4h has a 45.76% chance, and there's a 1.21% chance for a tie.
Finally, if you put the opponent on top two pair:
AJ wins 64% of the time.
As far as pot odds, by my math you have a $33.75 pot in front of you on the reraise, and have to call $17.75. So you're getting two to one on your money.
If you put them on A high kicker, you have to call. Big winner here. Against AJ its a coinflip in terms of pot odds, and against a set, you're going slightly against pot odds.
But overall, looking at the math, if you don't have a good read on your opponent, and he can have any of the above hands (or maybe worse), then you should call.
|
|
|
|
johnnyawe
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1,064
|
|
Michael, thank you for the correct analysis.
|
|
|