|
pokerfan
|
03-21-2008, 07:51 PM
Post subject: i ran pokerEV and found my Won W/O showdown negative!!!!
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: NS, Canada
Posts: 1,736
|
|
please troubleshoot my problem. Over the last 18k hands i played in 100NL, my showdown winnings was $3568.60 but my Won W/O showdown was -$986. After running pokerEV, i found that i ran very well with my all-in luck, but my total winnings is far below my showdown & expected winnings , which really worried me a whole lot. Did i fold too much to preflop & postflop aggression with marginal hands ?
my major stats:
VP$IP: 13.69%
pfr%: 9.96%
AF:3.55
cb%: 57.71%
att to steal%: 29.25%
won& when saw flop%: 35.49%
BB/100 hands: 7.32
BB/100 hands after equity adjusted(all-ins): 5.7
|
|
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
spoonitnow
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: IRC Chat Room
Posts: 5,406
|
|
My won w/o showdown has almost always been negative at 100nl and 200nl.
Now, I'm not sure if it's supposed to be or not.
|
|
|
|
swiggidy
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Waiting in the shadows ...
Posts: 3,777
|
|
well, if you're b/f or calling pre and folding a flop, etc those are all going to be minus on w/0 showdown. So I could see it being negative easily. When you do win it should be a smaller pot than if it makes it to showdown.
|
|
(\__/)
(='.'=)
(")_(")
|
|
pokerfan
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: NS, Canada
Posts: 1,736
|
|
ok, i got you guys points. should i increase my cb% to like 70%-80%
|
|
|
|
aka_red
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: house
Posts: 903
|
|
my cbet is prolly around 80-90%
|
|
[11:11] <+bikes> bitches love your face
|
|
Cocco_Bill
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,254
|
|
fullring..
I've played it enough to believe that most FR regulars even in mid high stakes games are pretty weak players compared to the better 6-max regulars.
|
|
|
|
Cocco_Bill
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,254
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by spoonitnow
My won w/o showdown has almost always been negative at 100nl and 200nl.
Now, I'm not sure if it's supposed to be or not.
|
It could mean that the games are soft enough for you to get away with playing straightforward unimaginative postflop poker probably missing tons of value by not taking advantage of good bluffing opportunities etc. Or else it could just mean that your hand strength requirements for showdown are too high. Also a lot of players in general are not very good at pot control.
Don't take this wrong, you are doing an amazing job playing a sick amount of hands with solid profit bro.
|
|
|
|
Deanglow
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: lol
Posts: 2,443
|
|
My win w/o showdown is always negative. I think blinds have a lot to do with it.
|
|
|
|
InditoEdo
|
02-07-2012, 10:36 PM
Post subject: Hello
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
High Card
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 2
|
|
Hello, i read your site, this a best site from me, thanks!
|
|
|
|
BankItDrew
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Losing Prop Bets
Posts: 2,789
|
|
There are a lot of reasons the red line is below even. Including:
- You get to showdown more often and are a tighter player preflop than the average player.
- You don't bet or raise as frequently as the average player.
- You are nitty from the blinds.
- You are getting caught bluffing before the river too often.
- You hand read very well and as a result are value betting thin vs weaker hands more often than the average player.
None of these nor combinations of these will determine if you are a winning player or not, it's just a style thing.
|

Girlfriend: Why are the werewolves more important than living life?!
Girlfriend: Are you on the forums doing the werewolves again?
Girlfriend: Soo... you forgot to run that errand, but you had time to werewolf? Wtf?
|
|
InditoEdo
|
|
High Card
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 2
|
|
nice bord
|
|
|