|
Iwind
|
09-29-2005, 10:21 AM
Post subject: Hate to fold
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Norway
Posts: 436
|
|
PokerStars Game #2686479358: Hold'em No Limit ($0.10/$0.25) - 2005/09/29 - 06:12:32 (ET)
Table 'Dziban IV' Seat #5 is the button
Seat 1: Suzimusen ($26.60 in chips)
Seat 2: L H K ($23.75 in chips)
Seat 3: james75 ($2.75 in chips)
Seat 4: e_o_h ($4.65 in chips)
Seat 5: happyasalark ($13.55 in chips)
Seat 7: ZenKiwi ($20.25 in chips)
Seat 8: Iwind ($24.75 in chips)
Seat 9: strikerU2 ($14.75 in chips)
Admiraler will be allowed to play after the button
ZenKiwi: posts small blind $0.10
Iwind: posts big blind $0.25
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to Iwind [Jc Jh]
strikerU2: folds
Suzimusen: calls $0.25
L H K: calls $0.25
james75: folds
e_o_h: folds
happyasalark: folds
ZenKiwi: calls $0.15
Iwind: raises $1 to $1.25
Suzimusen: calls $1
L H K: folds
ZenKiwi: calls $1
*** FLOP *** [8s 2d 4s]
ZenKiwi: bets $2.50
Iwind: raises $4.50 to $7
Suzimusen: folds
ZenKiwi: raises $12 to $19 and is all-in
Iwind: folds
ZenKiwi collected $17.15 from pot
ZenKiwi: doesn't show hand
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $18 | Rake $0.85
Board [8s 2d 4s]
Seat 1: Suzimusen folded on the Flop
Seat 2: L H K folded before Flop
Seat 3: james75 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 4: e_o_h folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 5: happyasalark (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 7: ZenKiwi (small blind) collected ($17.15)
Seat 8: Iwind (big blind) folded on the Flop
Seat 9: strikerU2 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Really hate to fold after putting so much money in, but most likely he has a set, don't you think? I thought I had to raise this much not to give him good odds for a flush draw. Anything I should have done differently?
|
|
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
DaHorror
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 616
|
|
This is one of those highly read-dependent situations.
If the guy's a donk he has 78, 89, 45, 77, 66, 55, 33, 99, A8, etc - and he thinks you're bluffing (had someone do this to me with 89 the other day but had notes on him so I could call in that situation).
If he's not, he's got a set. He might also be a donk and have 24.
Any reads/notes on the guy?
|
|
|
|
Iwind
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Norway
Posts: 436
|
|
This was just after I sat down at the table so I didn't have any reads on him at all. Usually when I think someone is playing like that, sitting with the hands you mentioned, I'm wrong and lose cash on it. Today I lost a whole buyin tn someone sitting with a set of fours when I had two pair AA, KK. Hate when people call my 6BB raise with 44 and stuff like that
|
|
|
|
UG
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,855
|
|
that's why you call 6bb raises with 44 and stuff like that
It's all about implied odds, baby.
|
|
|
|
STIdrivr
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Southern california
Posts: 580
|
|
He was in the SB.I think if he had a set he would check to the raiser instead of betting into you. You cant always give people on .25 too much credit.
|
|
|
|
PokerPatNEU
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 797
|
|
I'd say you're ahead here enough of the time to justify a call. It's only another 12$ to call and the pot is around $30. His possible holdings include a lot more hands than sets here. Why lead out a pot sized bet on a raggy board with a set? Can he read you for an over pair or is that your standard pre flop raise? Unless he is a good player with a strong read on you for an over pair that he knows you will pay off, this is a little too aggressive for a set from early position IMO.
|
|
|
|
bair
|
|
Full House
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 953
|
|
instacall
|
|
|