|
Demiparadigm
|
03-08-2006, 08:05 AM
Post subject: Goofing off, EZ call.
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Party 6 max
Posts: 1,602
|
|
Villain is 45/10/2
PokerStars Game #4215411193: Hold'em No Limit ($0.10/$0.25) - 2006/03/08 - 03:45:38 (ET)
Table 'Eunike' Seat #2 is the button
Seat 1: Ohgoa99 ($32.95 in chips)
Seat 2: Quagmire30 ($16.80 in chips)
Seat 5: Demiparadigm ($35.25 in chips)
Demiparadigm: posts small blind $0.10
Ohgoa99: posts big blind $0.25
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to Demiparadigm [3s Ac]
Quagmire30: folds
Demiparadigm: raises $0.75 to $1
Ohgoa99: calls $0.75
*** FLOP *** [Ah 6s Ts]
Demiparadigm: bets $1
Ohgoa99: calls $1
*** TURN *** [Ah 6s Ts] [5d]
FatDaddy2K5 joins the table at seat #4
Demiparadigm: bets $2
Ohgoa99: calls $2
*** RIVER *** [Ah 6s Ts 5d] [5h]
Demiparadigm: checks
Ohgoa99: bets $5.75
Demiparadigm: calls $5.75
|
|
To win in poker you only need to be one step ahead of your opponents. Two steps may be detrimental.
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
DogOnMySide
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 458
|
|
Why is that an easy call?
> 2.3 : 1 in the pot.
> I don't see any opp, no matter how bad, betting like that without an ace. Your only chance is an overpair like 99/JJ/QQ
>Do you REALLY want to show the crap you raised with, for metagame reasons?
Explain? I see this as a fold.
|
|
|
|
Demiparadigm
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Party 6 max
Posts: 1,602
|
|
> The table is 3 handed. I really don't care what people see me raising with. any Ace is easily worth a raise, as are most suited connectors.
> What is he calling with on the flop and turn? There are 6 aces better than mine (AK,AQ,AJ,AT,A6,A5) But chances are an agressive player will have raised any of these by the turn.
> It is possible, though unlikely that he was slowplaying a hand like TT or 66, but TT would oflen reraise preflop, as would AK and possibly AQ.
>What other hands are possible? I have a very agressive table image so he could easily be calling down with a worse pair than aces, or the obvious flush draw on the flop.
>On the river, we use a quick and dirty version of bayes' theorem to determine the best play. No missed draw will call any bet on the river, but may bet as a bluff. Other pairs may call a river value bet, but will also value bet some % of the time. Hands that beat us will always call, and will often raise. Missed draws may also raise as a bluff.
>Since there are more hands that we beat than beat us on the river, the best play is clearly to check with the intention of calling a bet.
|
|
To win in poker you only need to be one step ahead of your opponents. Two steps may be detrimental.
|
|
ChrisBCritter
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Falmouth, ME
Posts: 781
|
|
3 handed, I call that all day long.
Missed FD is too obvious, So he's either got that or a T. I'm thinking a better A is raising you on the flop or turn if he has any aggression in him...You're ahead way too many times to fold that river. NH.
|
|
Hey knucklehead! Bonk!
|
|
DogOnMySide
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 458
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Demiparadigm
> The table is 3 handed. I really don't care what people see me raising with. any Ace is easily worth a raise, as are most suited connectors.
|
Right that's error #1 from me, i assumed it was full ring and those were the only important/active players for some reason. Which does change things somewhat. 
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Demiparadigm
> What is he calling with on the flop and turn? There are 6 aces better than mine (AK,AQ,AJ,AT,A6,A5) But chances are an agressive player will have raised any of these by the turn.
|
Interesting cup-half-full take on it. I would look at my odds to win and say if he has an ace then I am either winning half the pot or losing it. Only being able to split or lose slashes the potential profitablility of a hand.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Demiparadigm
> It is possible, though unlikely that he was slowplaying a hand like TT or 66, but TT would oflen reraise preflop, as would AK and possibly AQ.
|
3-handed i agree pp's will get raised. The # players does change things.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Demiparadigm
>What other hands are possible? I have a very agressive table image so he could easily be calling down with a worse pair than aces, or the obvious flush draw on the flop.
>On the river, we use a quick and dirty version of bayes' theorem to determine the best play. No missed draw will call any bet on the river, but may bet as a bluff. Other pairs may call a river value bet, but will also value bet some % of the time. Hands that beat us will always call, and will often raise. Missed draws may also raise as a bluff.
>Since there are more hands that we beat than beat us on the river, the best play is clearly to check with the intention of calling a bet.
|
This is where i trip up a bit on your logic. There are more hands that we beat on the river, but surely the probability of opp having those hands is far lower?
Also, surely there is a threshhold level for what bet you will call? What is that level in this hand? He bet 5.25 into a pot of 8 (i think). Do you call a pot size bet too?
I know what you're saying, that broken crap like KQ/JQ and 2 spades plays this the same. But anyone who calls to the river then bets with that is also capable of playing AJ like that.
Interesting thread. Would like to read more opinions.
Why in gods name are you playing 3 handed poker? Was the table just filling up?
|
|
|
|
sejje
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 883
|
|
When he said there's more hands that we beat, he was talking about in villians range.
I call that against that player. I think he missed a FD. Just be crappy if it had a five in it. He could also easily have something like KT.
|
|
|
|
swiggidy
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Waiting in the shadows ...
Posts: 3,777
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Demiparadigm
>On the river, we use a quick and dirty version of bayes' theorem to determine the best play.
|
I think I U
|
|
(\__/)
(='.'=)
(")_(")
|
|
Rondavu
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,053
|
|
Standard. Well played
|
|
It's not what's inside that counts. Have you seen what's inside?
Internal organs. And they're getting uglier by the minute.
|
|
Renton
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
Posts: 5,992
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Rondavu
Standard. Well played
|
coming from LAG
typical
|
|
|