|
daven
|
05-05-2009, 03:14 AM
Post subject: fd/gutshot combo standard vs set?
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: soaking up ethanol, moving on up
Posts: 5,814
|
|
villin 10-6 and 100% fold to c-bet plus not much aggression to date over 200ish hands. I put him on a set against which i have zero fold equity, so.. flat or shove better?
Full Tilt No-Limit Hold'em, $1.00 BB (7 handed) - Full-Tilt Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com
Hero (CO) ($202.15)
Button ($62.45)
SB ($91.35)
BB ($213.10)
UTG ($70)
MP1 ($102.30)
MP2 ($120.25)
Preflop: Hero is CO with 6 , 5
1 fold, MP1 calls $1, 1 fold, Hero calls $1, Button calls $1, 1 fold, BB checks
Flop: ($4.50) A , 2 , 3 (4 players)
BB checks, MP1 bets $4.50, Hero raises to $13, 2 folds, MP1 raises to $33,
|
|
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
HiLo
|
|
Flush
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 250
|
|
If he definitely has a set you need better than 2:1 for the shove and you aren't getting it here. Flatting seems OK as long as he pays off a small bet when we hit and we don't pay off to his boat if he improves.
|
|
|
|
oskar
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: in ur accounts... confiscating ur funz
Posts: 2,452
|
|
About the flold-to c-bet... look at his donk-bet %.
Depending on how active he is post-flop, I would consider flatting the flop bet. You don't necessarily want to get it in on the flop with a draw that is easily dominated.
I don't think you should be raising without a plan against a 3-bet. You can't really call - you're prolly getting shoved into on the turn... I guess shove, but somebody do the math, please 
I really think you shouldn't have raised to begin with. If he's really passive then there's almost no chance he's folding to the raise... bloating the pot here isn't horrible, but I think there's more value in hitting it and then shoving.
|
|
|
|
pokerfan
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: NS, Canada
Posts: 1,736
|
|
just flat call his bet on the flop. As played, i'd fold to his 3 bet. Your straight or flush is so obvious when you hit , so your implied odds is worse than you think IMO. I'm not sure whether its profitable to limp in preflop behind one 10/6 limper.
|
|
|
|
oskar
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: in ur accounts... confiscating ur funz
Posts: 2,452
|
|
yah, I was going to say - I don't limp this with just one limper - unless there are some passive donks behind, and nobody in LP who is likely to iso us here.
|
|
The strengh of a hero is defined by the weakness of his villains.
|
|
badgers
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Spewing
Posts: 3,372
|
|
iso preflop unless he likes to LRR
I think the flop has to be a call - he is betting full pot on an Axx board after limping, it is unlikely he has a hand like AK/AQ and draws aren't really in his range. Once he pots the flop his range is super-strong and we have some nice implied odds as well as the chance to keep the button/BB in pot (especially if either of these players are fishy..)
As played you're getting like 3:1 on the call and you're ~3:1 to hit so it's a call as you don't need much in the way of implied odds even though your hand is not exactly disguised. Shove seems spewy.
|
3k post - Return of the blog!
|
|
JinxT4
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 265
|
|
Fold?
|
|
[04:18] <+Bbickes> do u has teh agoraphobia?
[04:18] <+fat> im agressive yes
|
|
Deanglow
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: lol
Posts: 2,443
|
|
preflop is fine but I don't see why you're raising the flop
|
|
|
|
mcatdog
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 3,654
|
|
Yeah I'd call the flop, and LOL at whoever suggesting folding to the 3-bet. You're getting 3:1 and even if he always folds on a flush turn (not true) he's stacking off 100% of the time when you hit your 3-outer for the gutshot.
Only reason flop could be a fold is if he sometimes is bluffing with a better flush draw, but I doubt he ever is, besides OP was nice enough to tell us the results that villain has a set.
|
|
|
|
daven
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: soaking up ethanol, moving on up
Posts: 5,814
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mcatdog
Yeah I'd call the flop, and LOL at whoever suggesting folding to the 3-bet.
Only reason flop could be a fold is if he sometimes is bluffing with a better flush draw, but I doubt he ever is, besides OP was nice enough to tell us the results that villain has a set.
|
the set thing was a read only, i thought i had clicked time while i was deciding what to do and got a rude shock when i time out-folded...
|
|
|
|
ATOTHEC101
|
|
Full House
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,248
|
|
I raise or fold pre, as played flat his flop bet, think of his utg limping range that fires so strongly at this flop multiway, very seldomly will he fold to a raise and often he'll 4 bet leaving you in the position of getting 100 bb's in with 30ish % equity.
|
|
"This sure beats Super Mario Bros.!" is my ejaculation catch phrase.
|
|
JinxT4
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 265
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mcatdog
Yeah I'd call the flop, and LOL at whoever suggesting folding to the 3-bet. You're getting 3:1 and even if he always folds on a flush turn (not true) he's stacking off 100% of the time when you hit your 3-outer for the gutshot.
Only reason flop could be a fold is if he sometimes is bluffing with a better flush draw, but I doubt he ever is, besides OP was nice enough to tell us the results that villain has a set.
|
I figured all of our outs are pretty action-killing. Even if we hit our gutter, you don't think villain would ever suspect 54s & not pay us off? Although I guess most people don't fold sets ever, so I'm probably wrong.
|
|
[04:18] <+Bbickes> do u has teh agoraphobia?
[04:18] <+fat> im agressive yes
|
|
ATOTHEC101
|
|
Full House
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,248
|
|
yeah people don't fold sets for 100 bbs....ever
|
|
"This sure beats Super Mario Bros.!" is my ejaculation catch phrase.
|