Poker Forum

Over 1,247,000 Posts!

Subscribe to FTR web feed
Already Registered?      Username:    Password:   Remember      Forgot Password
  >    > 

Could this have been avoided??

  
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Off5th
Old 12-06-2005, 01:04 PM     Post subject: Could this have been avoided?? #1 (permalink)  
Off5th's Avatar
Straight

Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ewa Beach
Posts: 180
Off5th
Send a message via AIM to Off5th
Party is soooo generous in giving out monsters!!! Two boats for the price of one Showdown.

***** Hand History for Game 3154002028 *****
0/0 Texas Hold'em Game Table (NL) - Tue Dec 06 08:55:07 EST 2005
Table Table 66593 (Real Money) -- Seat 3 is the button
Total number of players : 10
Seat 1: RKNUTSON ( $24.75)
Seat 2: Alfie_Moon ( $27.45)
Seat 3: edpricepga ( $24.75)
Seat 4: s1Lv1a ( $25.10)
Seat 5: godanboll ( $32.45)
Seat 6: Ticotin ( $24.30)
Seat 7: fumduc ( $23.90)
Seat 8: WellHung33 ( $20.65)
Seat 9: Mata7778 ( $7.30)
Seat 10: jiyishian ( $4.10)
s1Lv1a posts small blind (0.10)
godanboll posts big blind (0.25)
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to s1Lv1a [ 4d, 4s ]
Ticotin folds.
fumduc folds.
WellHung33 folds.
Mata7778 folds.
jiyishian folds.
RKNUTSON raises (3) to 3
Alfie_Moon folds.
edpricepga folds.
s1Lv1a calls (2.90)
godanboll folds.
** Dealing Flop ** : [ Kd, 4c, 3d ]
s1Lv1a checks.
RKNUTSON bets (2)
s1Lv1a raises (4) to 4
RKNUTSON calls (2)
** Dealing Turn ** : [ As ]
s1Lv1a bets (4)
RKNUTSON calls (4)
** Dealing River ** : [ 3s ]
s1Lv1a bets (14.10)
s1Lv1a is all-In.
RKNUTSON calls (13.75)
RKNUTSON is all-In.
Creating Main Pot with $47.30 with RKNUTSON
Creating Side Pot 1 with $0.35 with s1Lv1a
** Summary **
Main Pot: $47.30 | Side Pot 1: $0.35 | Rake: $2.45
Board: [ Kd 4c 3d As 3s ]
RKNUTSON balance $47.30, bet $24.75, collected $47.30, net +$22.55 [ Ks Kh ] [ a full house, Kings full of threes -- Ks,Kh,Kd,3d,3s ]
Alfie_Moon balance $27.45, didn't bet (folded)
edpricepga balance $24.75, didn't bet (folded)
s1Lv1a balance $0.35, bet $25.10, collected $0.35, lost -$24.75 [ 4d 4s ] [ a full house, Fours full of threes -- 4d,4s,4c,3d,3s ]
godanboll balance $32.20, lost $0.25 (folded)
Ticotin balance $24.30, didn't bet (folded)
fumduc balance $23.90, didn't bet (folded)
WellHung33 balance $20.65, didn't bet (folded)
Mata7778 balance $7.30, didn't bet (folded)
jiyishian balance $4.10, didn't bet (folded)
"I want to win money so I play the worst. If I could find a group of 2nd graders with $200 bankrolls I would play them."

-Aokrangly
 
Reply With Quote
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
Rondavu
Old 12-06-2005, 01:15 PM #2 (permalink)  
Rondavu's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,053
Rondavu
No
It's not what's inside that counts. Have you seen what's inside?
Internal organs. And they're getting uglier by the minute.
 
Reply With Quote
r8ed
Old 12-06-2005, 01:53 PM #3 (permalink)  
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,524
r8ed
You could fold preflop since the raise is $3 and he only has $24.75 but that's debatable. $3 is a big preflop raise at that level. If he's a tight player, then easily fold. If he's loose then this call isn't bad. Once you see the flop, you accomplished your goal by getting all your money in with a boat.
Reply With Quote
AHiltz
Old 12-06-2005, 02:34 PM #4 (permalink)  
AHiltz's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Coldbrook, NS
Posts: 1,589
AHiltz
Send a message via MSN to AHiltz
You went set hunting and caught. With a rainbow board you either lose your stack or take his.
Reply With Quote
Silly String
Old 12-06-2005, 03:16 PM #5 (permalink)  
Silly String's Avatar
Full House

Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: KC, MO
Posts: 1,434
Silly String
Quote:
Originally Posted by r8ed
You could fold preflop since the raise is $3 and he only has $24.75 but that's debatable. $3 is a big preflop raise at that level. If he's a tight player, then easily fold. If he's loose then this call isn't bad. Once you see the flop, you accomplished your goal by getting all your money in with a boat.
I agree with R8ed: I don't call over 10% of my stack with 22-44 I find my set over set ratio to outway the reward. I will happily call smaller PFRs though. . . that is table dependent of course. In this case, I would only call <= $1.50.

Once you caught your set, I am going broke here too.
Playing live . . . thanks alot Bin Laden.
 
Reply With Quote
Miffed22001
Old 12-06-2005, 03:50 PM #6 (permalink)  
Miffed22001's Avatar
Straight Flush

Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Marry Me Cheryl!!!
Posts: 8,181
Miffed22001 is on a distinguished road
big preflop raise at25nl tells you imo he has a big pp TT/JJ/QQ most likely
The fact he calls you through two streets tells me he likes his hand, especially when the ace turns up and he still calls.
I agree with others you dont ever get away from this but i wouldnt push the river after he calls through i just bet it quite big. But then if he pushes im calling anyway.
Why only bet? because of the way 25nl players play/raise big pp's preflop
Reply With Quote
Silly String
Old 12-06-2005, 03:56 PM #7 (permalink)  
Silly String's Avatar
Full House

Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: KC, MO
Posts: 1,434
Silly String
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miffed22001
big preflop raise at25nl tells you imo he has a big pp TT/JJ/QQ most likely
Agreed. I usually see TT-QQ here. People who raise it this much are scared to play their hand post-flop with overcards. They are OK with taking the blinds/limper's money and not taking a flop. Occasionally you see the AA or KK -- I don't know what they are thinking.
Playing live . . . thanks alot Bin Laden.
 
Reply With Quote
dalecooper
Old 12-06-2005, 04:55 PM #8 (permalink)  
dalecooper's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,107
dalecooper
I don't call his pre-flop raise. The implied odds aren't there. Otherwise, no, you're going to get boned on this hand.
Reply With Quote
Fnord
Old 12-06-2005, 05:34 PM     Post subject: Re: Could this have been avoided?? #9 (permalink)  
Fnord's Avatar
Moderator

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,334
Fnord is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via MSN to Fnord
Quote:
Originally Posted by Off5th
RKNUTSON bets (2)
s1Lv1a raises (4) to 4
RKNUTSON calls (2)
** Dealing Turn ** : [ As ]
s1Lv1a bets (4)
RKNUTSON calls (4)
** Dealing River ** : [ 3s ]
s1Lv1a bets (14.10)
The pre-flop call is terrible. Post-flop is pretty typical tight/passive fair.

Everyone likes players who under-bet well defined hands up until the river.
 
Reply With Quote
TalentedTom
Old 12-06-2005, 05:53 PM #10 (permalink)  
TalentedTom's Avatar
Flush

Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 289
TalentedTom
Send a message via MSN to TalentedTom
Set hunting is not justified here:

Preflop you get 8.3 - 1 on your money
Hitting a set is 7.5-1
When you hit your set you are a 90% favorate meaning you need 8.5 implied odds preflop for BREAK even, add rake and your play is HUGE -EV

If you add rake to these micro levels where they always take MAX rake the 10% rule does not really apply.
You need minimum 11:1 implied odds if you include rake in the equation and thats almost a break even play


Consider your play you payed $25 to win a $47 pot. which is $22 profit, you payd $3 preflop to make $22 profit, no way in hell this is justified.
Tom.S
 
Reply With Quote
Silly String
Old 12-06-2005, 06:28 PM #11 (permalink)  
Silly String's Avatar
Full House

Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: KC, MO
Posts: 1,434
Silly String
Quote:
Originally Posted by TalentedTom
Set hunting is not justified here:

Preflop you get 8.3 - 1 on your money
Hitting a set is 7.5-1
When you hit your set you are a 90% favorate meaning you need 8.5 implied odds preflop for BREAK even, add rake and your play is HUGE -EV

If you add rake to these micro levels where they always take MAX rake the 10% rule does not really apply.
You need minimum 11:1 implied odds if you include rake in the equation and thats almost a break even play


Consider your play you payed $25 to win a $47 pot. which is $22 profit, you payd $3 preflop to make $22 profit, no way in hell this is justified.
Good post. I only have one thing to add: Don't forget to figure the times you can't get all his money in the middle, winning only $5-10.
Playing live . . . thanks alot Bin Laden.
 
Reply With Quote
TalentedTom
Old 12-06-2005, 07:52 PM #12 (permalink)  
TalentedTom's Avatar
Flush

Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 289
TalentedTom
Send a message via MSN to TalentedTom
Yes its also possible he has QQ or KK and an overcard on the flop kills your action.
Tom.S
 
Reply With Quote
Off5th
Old 12-07-2005, 12:07 AM #13 (permalink)  
Off5th's Avatar
Straight

Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ewa Beach
Posts: 180
Off5th
Send a message via AIM to Off5th
Quote:
Originally Posted by TalentedTom
Set hunting is not justified here:

Preflop you get 8.3 - 1 on your money
Hitting a set is 7.5-1
When you hit your set you are a 90% favorate meaning you need 8.5 implied odds preflop for BREAK even, add rake and your play is HUGE -EV

If you add rake to these micro levels where they always take MAX rake the 10% rule does not really apply.
You need minimum 11:1 implied odds if you include rake in the equation and thats almost a break even play


Consider your play you payed $25 to win a $47 pot. which is $22 profit, you payd $3 preflop to make $22 profit, no way in hell this is justified.

I'll be sure to keep those numbers in mind. The only reason why I called here is because I was set hunting. If I didn't flop it I would've gladly folded to any further raises. Since I did I was sure I was the favorite so I bet hard. Well this is the first time that a bigger boat crushed me so now I know. I'll make all the minor adjustments and think of implied and pot odds next time. It was a way of party poker telling me "You can't always go set hunting when you have pocket pairs, if you do with wrong odds we will put a bigger set out there to beat you!!!!!"
"I want to win money so I play the worst. If I could find a group of 2nd graders with $200 bankrolls I would play them."

-Aokrangly
 
Reply With Quote
Lukie
Old 12-07-2005, 03:30 AM #14 (permalink)  
Lukie's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: back with a vengeance
Posts: 3,307
Lukie is on a distinguished road
Just out of curiousity, what was going through your mind when you hit the call button?

12xBB call that's almost 1/8th of your stack when your OOP (not a very big deal here) and don't close the action with 44?

I know this has been said, but thats a bad call and even if you get all-in with villain AND win everytime you hit a set, this is still -EV.

Post-flop is played far too passive. I understand the check-raise on the flop, but make it a meaningful bet. I don't understand check/min-raising a 1/3 potsize bet. I'd make it at least 8 total and punch the rest in the next chance you get.
Reply With Quote
mxiu
Old 12-07-2005, 07:00 AM #15 (permalink)  
mxiu's Avatar
Full House

Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 982
mxiu
Don't call 12xBB to chase a set.
Reply With Quote
Off5th
Old 12-07-2005, 07:21 AM #16 (permalink)  
Off5th's Avatar
Straight

Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ewa Beach
Posts: 180
Off5th
Send a message via AIM to Off5th
Quote:
Originally Posted by TalentedTom
Set hunting is not justified here:

Preflop you get 8.3 - 1 on your money
Hitting a set is 7.5-1
When you hit your set you are a 90% favorate meaning you need 8.5 implied odds preflop for BREAK even, add rake and your play is HUGE -EV

If you add rake to these micro levels where they always take MAX rake the 10% rule does not really apply.
You need minimum 11:1 implied odds if you include rake in the equation and thats almost a break even play


Consider your play you payed $25 to win a $47 pot. which is $22 profit, you payd $3 preflop to make $22 profit, no way in hell this is justified.

I agree I might have been "Set" happy here chasing with just 44. Well since the odds of hitting a set is 7.5-1. What would have been the correct raise to call with my money preflop considering its a $25 n/l table. Should have there been more money from other callers to make this call justifiable?? I need to know more than the odds here. I need to know exactly what raise I should've called with.
"I want to win money so I play the worst. If I could find a group of 2nd graders with $200 bankrolls I would play them."

-Aokrangly
 
Reply With Quote
Off5th
Old 12-07-2005, 07:28 AM #17 (permalink)  
Off5th's Avatar
Straight

Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ewa Beach
Posts: 180
Off5th
Send a message via AIM to Off5th
Quote:
Originally Posted by dalecooper
I don't call his pre-flop raise. The implied odds aren't there. Otherwise, no, you're going to get boned on this hand.
Can you explain this further???
"I want to win money so I play the worst. If I could find a group of 2nd graders with $200 bankrolls I would play them."

-Aokrangly
 
Reply With Quote
Fnord
Old 12-07-2005, 08:21 AM #18 (permalink)  
Fnord's Avatar
Moderator

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,334
Fnord is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via MSN to Fnord
http://www.flopturnriver.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=83

Note: the date of the post
 
Reply With Quote
Reply
Latest Poker News
KoRnholio Old 05-26-2012, 03:08 PM    Australia Legalized Online Poker coming up in next 6 to 12 Months
According to an email sent out by Mark Bryan, a gaming analyst at Merrill Lynch, the Australian government plans to legalize online poker sometime in the next six to 12 months. This move will coincide ...

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 05:20 PM.


FTR Testimonials

All content
© FlopTurnRiver.com
Advertising  |   Partners  |   Testimonials  |   T&C  |   Contact Us  |   FTR News & Press  |   Site Map  |   Search FTR

Full Tilt  |   Titan Poker  |   UltimateBet  |   Poker Stars  |   Ladbrokes Bonus  |   Sportsbook  |   Cake Poker  

Play Texas Holdem Online, Online Texas Holdem Strategy, & Poker Forum
This is not a gambling website.