Poker Forum

Over 1,247,000 Posts!

Subscribe to FTR web feed
Already Registered?      Username:    Password:   Remember      Forgot Password
  >    > 

Confidence killed

  
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Duckslayer2k
Old 11-23-2006, 06:29 PM     Post subject: Confidence killed #1 (permalink)  
Duckslayer2k's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 42
Duckslayer2k
I've had a bad run lately, and I don't know whether it is because I suck or what. I'll just post some hands and comment on them if you want. Thanks.

Hand #1: http://www.pokerhand.org/?628058
- was I overaggressive here?

Hand #2: http://www.pokerhand.org/?627962
- can I really call with my hand amist all this action?

Hand #3: http://www.pokerhand.org/?626628
- for all you that said you can't fold a set on a non-connected, non flush board... I beg to differ.. i easily coulda layed this down, I thought for sure he had KK after he reraised me on the turn, but stupidly pushed all in.

Hand #4: http://www.pokerhand.org/?626480
- I have problems with this.. people bet large, or push AI on the river and i have something pretty good but not the nutz, do I lay down or call on river?
Reply With Quote
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
bbqsquirrel
Old 11-23-2006, 07:29 PM #2 (permalink)  
Flush

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 260
bbqsquirrel
I don't play at limits this high so please take my comments with a grain of salt.

1. Shit happens. Lay it down only if you have a really good read on opponent.

2. Right fold. I won't be result oriented. Very rarely do you run into 3 other donks in the same hand. Given the action someone could easily have JJ or a set. The guy with pair+draw (14 outs) is actually ahead of you. I might not even bother to call the 1st flop bet.

3. I don't know. I guess this is the mental part of the game.

4. I might fold. An overpair probably won't lead into strength on the river.
BBQSquirrel's poker blog

100NL adventures -- both FR and 6max

http://bbqsquirrel.blogspot.com
 
Reply With Quote
Ravageur
Old 11-23-2006, 08:06 PM #3 (permalink)  
Ravageur's Avatar
Official Montreal SwampRat
Full House

Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 1,242
Ravageur is on a distinguished road
Send a message via MSN to Ravageur
dude you played these hands fine, don't beat yourself up over 4 tough spots.

You don't beat much in hand 1, but top two is tough to lay down on a non-flush-straight board.
Family Cruise IMO
 
Reply With Quote
salsa4ever
Old 11-24-2006, 02:12 PM     Post subject: Re: Confidence killed #4 (permalink)  
salsa4ever's Avatar
Full House

Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,073
salsa4ever
Send a message via MSN to salsa4ever
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duckslayer2k
I've had a bad run lately, and I don't know whether it is because I suck or what. I'll just post some hands and comment on them if you want. Thanks.

Hand #1: http://www.pokerhand.org/?628058
- was I overaggressive here?

Hand #2: http://www.pokerhand.org/?627962
- can I really call with my hand amist all this action?

Hand #3: http://www.pokerhand.org/?626628
- for all you that said you can't fold a set on a non-connected, non flush board... I beg to differ.. i easily coulda layed this down, I thought for sure he had KK after he reraised me on the turn, but stupidly pushed all in.

Hand #4: http://www.pokerhand.org/?626480
- I have problems with this.. people bet large, or push AI on the river and i have something pretty good but not the nutz, do I lay down or call on river?
Hmmm... sucks to be you

Hand #1, With top 2 pair in a raised pot OOP I don't have a better line. You can't get a cheap showdown and you can't really lay down to the flop nearly min-raise. You beat AK, AJ, KK, draw, and a bluff... turn check raise line looks good to me because you maximize the value against the hands you beat.

Hand #3, if you don't play baby pairs in shithouse position, you won't get this problem. Problem with playing these baby pairs is you need at least 10:1 implied odds to compensate your set over set hands and you're going to be OOP and it's just so damn hard to build a big pot against good opposition holding a one-pair hand OOP even if you hit your set. 44 also has almost no value if you don't hit your set.

Hand #4, fine. 4 to 1 odds
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigred
Would you bone your cousins? Salsa would.
Quote:
Originally Posted by salsa4ever
well courtie, since we're both clear, would you accept an invitation for some unprotected sex?
 
Reply With Quote
Warpe
Old 11-24-2006, 02:47 PM     Post subject: Re: Confidence killed #5 (permalink)  
Warpe's Avatar
Moderator

Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Canuckistan
Posts: 3,905
Warpe is a jewel in the roughWarpe is a jewel in the roughWarpe is a jewel in the roughWarpe is a jewel in the rough
Quote:
Originally Posted by salsa4ever
Hand #3, if you don't play baby pairs in shithouse position, you won't get this problem. Problem with playing these baby pairs is you need at least 10:1 implied odds to compensate your set over set hands and you're going to be OOP and it's just so damn hard to build a big pot against good opposition holding a one-pair hand OOP even if you hit your set. 44 also has almost no value if you don't hit your set.
Not playing 44 oop here when p/f raiser wants to play a big hand is silly. This is exactly the situation you want. Playing for set value is exactly the point.

If you're routinely folding baby pairs in EP, you have a huge leak. The only debate is whether you should limp 'em or raise 'em, and to some people it's not a debate.
Reply With Quote
givememyleg
Old 11-24-2006, 03:23 PM     Post subject: Re: Confidence killed #6 (permalink)  
givememyleg's Avatar
WHO YA GONNA CALL?!??
Administrator

Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: ISHPERMING MISHIGEN
Posts: 5,042
givememyleg is a splendid one to beholdgivememyleg is a splendid one to beholdgivememyleg is a splendid one to beholdgivememyleg is a splendid one to beholdgivememyleg is a splendid one to beholdgivememyleg is a splendid one to beholdgivememyleg is a splendid one to behold
Quote:
Originally Posted by salsa4ever
Hand #3, if you don't play baby pairs in shithouse position, you won't get this problem. Problem with playing these baby pairs is you need at least 10:1 implied odds to compensate your set over set hands and you're going to be OOP and it's just so damn hard to build a big pot against good opposition holding a one-pair hand OOP even if you hit your set. 44 also has almost no value if you don't hit your set.

Get your own badge! Click profile at the top and FTR Badge from the left nav.


"The Dragon in My Garage" by Carl Sagan
I say onto you, I've felt the dragon! I felt the touch of his tail, the breath of his fire, and I know without a shadow of a doubt that the dragon exists!
 
Reply With Quote
Reply
Latest Poker News
KoRnholio Old 05-26-2012, 03:08 PM    Australia Legalized Online Poker coming up in next 6 to 12 Months
According to an email sent out by Mark Bryan, a gaming analyst at Merrill Lynch, the Australian government plans to legalize online poker sometime in the next six to 12 months. This move will coincide ...

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 05:04 PM.


FTR Testimonials

All content
© FlopTurnRiver.com
Advertising  |   Partners  |   Testimonials  |   T&C  |   Contact Us  |   FTR News & Press  |   Site Map  |   Search FTR

Full Tilt  |   Titan Poker  |   UltimateBet  |   Poker Stars  |   Ladbrokes Bonus  |   Sportsbook  |   Cake Poker  

Play Texas Holdem Online, Online Texas Holdem Strategy, & Poker Forum
This is not a gambling website.