|
Duckslayer2k
|
11-23-2006, 06:29 PM
Post subject: Confidence killed
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 42
|
|
I've had a bad run lately, and I don't know whether it is because I suck or what. I'll just post some hands and comment on them if you want. Thanks.
Hand #1: http://www.pokerhand.org/?628058
- was I overaggressive here?
Hand #2: http://www.pokerhand.org/?627962
- can I really call with my hand amist all this action?
Hand #3: http://www.pokerhand.org/?626628
- for all you that said you can't fold a set on a non-connected, non flush board... I beg to differ.. i easily coulda layed this down, I thought for sure he had KK after he reraised me on the turn, but stupidly pushed all in.
Hand #4: http://www.pokerhand.org/?626480
- I have problems with this.. people bet large, or push AI on the river and i have something pretty good but not the nutz, do I lay down or call on river?
|
|
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
bbqsquirrel
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 260
|
|
I don't play at limits this high so please take my comments with a grain of salt.
1. Shit happens. Lay it down only if you have a really good read on opponent.
2. Right fold. I won't be result oriented. Very rarely do you run into 3 other donks in the same hand. Given the action someone could easily have JJ or a set. The guy with pair+draw (14 outs) is actually ahead of you. I might not even bother to call the 1st flop bet.
3. I don't know. I guess this is the mental part of the game.
4. I might fold. An overpair probably won't lead into strength on the river.
|
|
|
|
Ravageur
|
|
Official Montreal SwampRat
Full House
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 1,242
|
|
dude you played these hands fine, don't beat yourself up over 4 tough spots.
You don't beat much in hand 1, but top two is tough to lay down on a non-flush-straight board.
|
|
Family Cruise IMO
|
|
salsa4ever
|
11-24-2006, 02:12 PM
Post subject: Re: Confidence killed
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,073
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Duckslayer2k
I've had a bad run lately, and I don't know whether it is because I suck or what. I'll just post some hands and comment on them if you want. Thanks.
Hand #1: http://www.pokerhand.org/?628058
- was I overaggressive here?
Hand #2: http://www.pokerhand.org/?627962
- can I really call with my hand amist all this action?
Hand #3: http://www.pokerhand.org/?626628
- for all you that said you can't fold a set on a non-connected, non flush board... I beg to differ.. i easily coulda layed this down, I thought for sure he had KK after he reraised me on the turn, but stupidly pushed all in.
Hand #4: http://www.pokerhand.org/?626480
- I have problems with this.. people bet large, or push AI on the river and i have something pretty good but not the nutz, do I lay down or call on river?
|
Hmmm... sucks to be you
Hand #1, With top 2 pair in a raised pot OOP I don't have a better line. You can't get a cheap showdown and you can't really lay down to the flop nearly min-raise. You beat AK, AJ, KK, draw, and a bluff... turn check raise line looks good to me because you maximize the value against the hands you beat.
Hand #3, if you don't play baby pairs in shithouse position, you won't get this problem. Problem with playing these baby pairs is you need at least 10:1 implied odds to compensate your set over set hands and you're going to be OOP and it's just so damn hard to build a big pot against good opposition holding a one-pair hand OOP even if you hit your set. 44 also has almost no value if you don't hit your set.
Hand #4, fine. 4 to 1 odds
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bigred
Would you bone your cousins? Salsa would.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by salsa4ever
well courtie, since we're both clear, would you accept an invitation for some unprotected sex?
|
|
|
Warpe
|
11-24-2006, 02:47 PM
Post subject: Re: Confidence killed
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Canuckistan
Posts: 3,905
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by salsa4ever
Hand #3, if you don't play baby pairs in shithouse position, you won't get this problem. Problem with playing these baby pairs is you need at least 10:1 implied odds to compensate your set over set hands and you're going to be OOP and it's just so damn hard to build a big pot against good opposition holding a one-pair hand OOP even if you hit your set. 44 also has almost no value if you don't hit your set.
|
Not playing 44 oop here when p/f raiser wants to play a big hand is silly. This is exactly the situation you want. Playing for set value is exactly the point.
If you're routinely folding baby pairs in EP, you have a huge leak. The only debate is whether you should limp 'em or raise 'em, and to some people it's not a debate.
|
|
|
|
givememyleg
|
11-24-2006, 03:23 PM
Post subject: Re: Confidence killed
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
WHO YA GONNA CALL?!??
Administrator
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: ISHPERMING MISHIGEN
Posts: 5,042
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by salsa4ever
Hand #3, if you don't play baby pairs in shithouse position, you won't get this problem. Problem with playing these baby pairs is you need at least 10:1 implied odds to compensate your set over set hands and you're going to be OOP and it's just so damn hard to build a big pot against good opposition holding a one-pair hand OOP even if you hit your set. 44 also has almost no value if you don't hit your set.
|
|

Get your own badge! Click profile at the top and FTR Badge from the left nav.
"The Dragon in My Garage" by Carl Sagan
I say onto you, I've felt the dragon! I felt the touch of his tail, the breath of his fire, and I know without a shadow of a doubt that the dragon exists!
|