Poker Forum

Over 1,247,000 Posts!

REGISTER
Subscribe to FTR web feed
Already Registered?      Username:    Password:   Remember      Forgot Password

Poker Forum

  > 

Full Ring NL Hold'em

  > 

Can't believe this one (AKs vs 63s)

  
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
toekneechin
Old 02-28-2004, 02:22 AM     Post subject: Can't believe this one (AKs vs 63s) #1 (permalink)  

Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 88
toekneechin
***** Hand History for Game 418782263 *****
15/30 TourneyTexasHTGameTable (NL) (Tournament 2458962) - Fri Feb 27 16:41:33 EST 2004
Table Card Room Table 4445 (Real Money) -- Seat 8 is the button
Total number of players : 9
Seat 1: Player1 (605)
Seat 3: Me (715)
Seat 4: Player4 (460)
Seat 5: Player5 (805)
Seat 6: Player6 (1110)
Seat 7: Player7 (1955)
Seat 8: Player8 (575)
Seat 9: Player9 (1065)
Seat 10: Player10 (710)
Player9 posts small blind (10)
Player10 posts big blind (15)
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to Me [ As, Ks ]
Player1 calls (15)
Me raises (100) to 100
Player4 folds.
Player5 folds.
Player6 folds.
Player7 folds.
Player8 folds.
Player6: uh, wow
Player9 calls (90)
Player10 folds.
Player1 folds.
** Dealing Flop ** : [ 6c, 8h, Jh ]
Player9 bets (70)
Me calls (70)
** Dealing Turn ** : [ Kh ]
Player9 bets (325)
Me calls (325)
** Dealing River ** : [ 5s ]
Player9 bets (570)
Player9 is all-In.
Me calls (220)
Me is all-In.
Creating Main Pot with $1460 with Me
Creating Side Pot 1 with $350 with Player9
** Summary **
Main Pot: 1460 | Side Pot 1: 350
Board: [ 6c 8h Jh Kh 5s ]
Player1 balance 590, lost 15 (folded)
Me balance 0, lost 715 [ As Ks ] [ a pair of kings -- As,Ks,Kh,Jh,8h ]
Player4 balance 460, didn't bet (folded)
Player5 balance 805, didn't bet (folded)
Player6 balance 1110, didn't bet (folded)
Player7 balance 1955, didn't bet (folded)
Player8 balance 575, didn't bet (folded)
Player9 balance 1810, bet 1065, collected 1810, net +745 [ 6h 3h ] [ a flush, king high -- Kh,Jh,8h,6h,3h ]
Player10 balance 695, lost 15 (folded)



Anyone would have done some thing different? I can't believe he called a 100 raise with 63s.
Reply With Quote

Play for FREE and practice your game at...

Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
toekneechin
Old 02-28-2004, 02:22 AM     Post subject: Can't believe this one (AKs vs 63s) #2 (permalink)  

Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 88
toekneechin
***** Hand History for Game 418782263 *****
15/30 TourneyTexasHTGameTable (NL) (Tournament 2458962) - Fri Feb 27 16:41:33 EST 2004
Table Card Room Table 4445 (Real Money) -- Seat 8 is the button
Total number of players : 9
Seat 1: Player1 (605)
Seat 3: Me (715)
Seat 4: Player4 (460)
Seat 5: Player5 (805)
Seat 6: Player6 (1110)
Seat 7: Player7 (1955)
Seat 8: Player8 (575)
Seat 9: Player9 (1065)
Seat 10: Player10 (710)
Player9 posts small blind (10)
Player10 posts big blind (15)
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to Me [ As, Ks ]
Player1 calls (15)
Me raises (100) to 100
Player4 folds.
Player5 folds.
Player6 folds.
Player7 folds.
Player8 folds.
Player6: uh, wow
Player9 calls (90)
Player10 folds.
Player1 folds.
** Dealing Flop ** : [ 6c, 8h, Jh ]
Player9 bets (70)
Me calls (70)
** Dealing Turn ** : [ Kh ]
Player9 bets (325)
Me calls (325)
** Dealing River ** : [ 5s ]
Player9 bets (570)
Player9 is all-In.
Me calls (220)
Me is all-In.
Creating Main Pot with $1460 with Me
Creating Side Pot 1 with $350 with Player9
** Summary **
Main Pot: 1460 | Side Pot 1: 350
Board: [ 6c 8h Jh Kh 5s ]
Player1 balance 590, lost 15 (folded)
Me balance 0, lost 715 [ As Ks ] [ a pair of kings -- As,Ks,Kh,Jh,8h ]
Player4 balance 460, didn't bet (folded)
Player5 balance 805, didn't bet (folded)
Player6 balance 1110, didn't bet (folded)
Player7 balance 1955, didn't bet (folded)
Player8 balance 575, didn't bet (folded)
Player9 balance 1810, bet 1065, collected 1810, net +745 [ 6h 3h ] [ a flush, king high -- Kh,Jh,8h,6h,3h ]
Player10 balance 695, lost 15 (folded)



Anyone would have done some thing different? I can't believe he called a 100 raise with 63s.
Reply With Quote
toekneechin
Old 02-28-2004, 02:22 AM     Post subject: Can't believe this one (AKs vs 63s) #3 (permalink)  

Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 88
toekneechin
***** Hand History for Game 418782263 *****
15/30 TourneyTexasHTGameTable (NL) (Tournament 2458962) - Fri Feb 27 16:41:33 EST 2004
Table Card Room Table 4445 (Real Money) -- Seat 8 is the button
Total number of players : 9
Seat 1: Player1 (605)
Seat 3: Me (715)
Seat 4: Player4 (460)
Seat 5: Player5 (805)
Seat 6: Player6 (1110)
Seat 7: Player7 (1955)
Seat 8: Player8 (575)
Seat 9: Player9 (1065)
Seat 10: Player10 (710)
Player9 posts small blind (10)
Player10 posts big blind (15)
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to Me [ As, Ks ]
Player1 calls (15)
Me raises (100) to 100
Player4 folds.
Player5 folds.
Player6 folds.
Player7 folds.
Player8 folds.
Player6: uh, wow
Player9 calls (90)
Player10 folds.
Player1 folds.
** Dealing Flop ** : [ 6c, 8h, Jh ]
Player9 bets (70)
Me calls (70)
** Dealing Turn ** : [ Kh ]
Player9 bets (325)
Me calls (325)
** Dealing River ** : [ 5s ]
Player9 bets (570)
Player9 is all-In.
Me calls (220)
Me is all-In.
Creating Main Pot with $1460 with Me
Creating Side Pot 1 with $350 with Player9
** Summary **
Main Pot: 1460 | Side Pot 1: 350
Board: [ 6c 8h Jh Kh 5s ]
Player1 balance 590, lost 15 (folded)
Me balance 0, lost 715 [ As Ks ] [ a pair of kings -- As,Ks,Kh,Jh,8h ]
Player4 balance 460, didn't bet (folded)
Player5 balance 805, didn't bet (folded)
Player6 balance 1110, didn't bet (folded)
Player7 balance 1955, didn't bet (folded)
Player8 balance 575, didn't bet (folded)
Player9 balance 1810, bet 1065, collected 1810, net +745 [ 6h 3h ] [ a flush, king high -- Kh,Jh,8h,6h,3h ]
Player10 balance 695, lost 15 (folded)



Anyone would have done some thing different? I can't believe he called a 100 raise with 63s.
Reply With Quote
toekneechin
Old 02-28-2004, 02:22 AM     Post subject: Can't believe this one (AKs vs 63s) #4 (permalink)  

Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 88
toekneechin
***** Hand History for Game 418782263 *****
15/30 TourneyTexasHTGameTable (NL) (Tournament 2458962) - Fri Feb 27 16:41:33 EST 2004
Table Card Room Table 4445 (Real Money) -- Seat 8 is the button
Total number of players : 9
Seat 1: Player1 (605)
Seat 3: Me (715)
Seat 4: Player4 (460)
Seat 5: Player5 (805)
Seat 6: Player6 (1110)
Seat 7: Player7 (1955)
Seat 8: Player8 (575)
Seat 9: Player9 (1065)
Seat 10: Player10 (710)
Player9 posts small blind (10)
Player10 posts big blind (15)
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to Me [ As, Ks ]
Player1 calls (15)
Me raises (100) to 100
Player4 folds.
Player5 folds.
Player6 folds.
Player7 folds.
Player8 folds.
Player6: uh, wow
Player9 calls (90)
Player10 folds.
Player1 folds.
** Dealing Flop ** : [ 6c, 8h, Jh ]
Player9 bets (70)
Me calls (70)
** Dealing Turn ** : [ Kh ]
Player9 bets (325)
Me calls (325)
** Dealing River ** : [ 5s ]
Player9 bets (570)
Player9 is all-In.
Me calls (220)
Me is all-In.
Creating Main Pot with $1460 with Me
Creating Side Pot 1 with $350 with Player9
** Summary **
Main Pot: 1460 | Side Pot 1: 350
Board: [ 6c 8h Jh Kh 5s ]
Player1 balance 590, lost 15 (folded)
Me balance 0, lost 715 [ As Ks ] [ a pair of kings -- As,Ks,Kh,Jh,8h ]
Player4 balance 460, didn't bet (folded)
Player5 balance 805, didn't bet (folded)
Player6 balance 1110, didn't bet (folded)
Player7 balance 1955, didn't bet (folded)
Player8 balance 575, didn't bet (folded)
Player9 balance 1810, bet 1065, collected 1810, net +745 [ 6h 3h ] [ a flush, king high -- Kh,Jh,8h,6h,3h ]
Player10 balance 695, lost 15 (folded)



Anyone would have done some thing different? I can't believe he called a 100 raise with 63s.
Reply With Quote
toekneechin
Old 02-28-2004, 02:22 AM     Post subject: Can't believe this one (AKs vs 63s) #5 (permalink)  

Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 88
toekneechin
***** Hand History for Game 418782263 *****
15/30 TourneyTexasHTGameTable (NL) (Tournament 2458962) - Fri Feb 27 16:41:33 EST 2004
Table Card Room Table 4445 (Real Money) -- Seat 8 is the button
Total number of players : 9
Seat 1: Player1 (605)
Seat 3: Me (715)
Seat 4: Player4 (460)
Seat 5: Player5 (805)
Seat 6: Player6 (1110)
Seat 7: Player7 (1955)
Seat 8: Player8 (575)
Seat 9: Player9 (1065)
Seat 10: Player10 (710)
Player9 posts small blind (10)
Player10 posts big blind (15)
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to Me [ As, Ks ]
Player1 calls (15)
Me raises (100) to 100
Player4 folds.
Player5 folds.
Player6 folds.
Player7 folds.
Player8 folds.
Player6: uh, wow
Player9 calls (90)
Player10 folds.
Player1 folds.
** Dealing Flop ** : [ 6c, 8h, Jh ]
Player9 bets (70)
Me calls (70)
** Dealing Turn ** : [ Kh ]
Player9 bets (325)
Me calls (325)
** Dealing River ** : [ 5s ]
Player9 bets (570)
Player9 is all-In.
Me calls (220)
Me is all-In.
Creating Main Pot with $1460 with Me
Creating Side Pot 1 with $350 with Player9
** Summary **
Main Pot: 1460 | Side Pot 1: 350
Board: [ 6c 8h Jh Kh 5s ]
Player1 balance 590, lost 15 (folded)
Me balance 0, lost 715 [ As Ks ] [ a pair of kings -- As,Ks,Kh,Jh,8h ]
Player4 balance 460, didn't bet (folded)
Player5 balance 805, didn't bet (folded)
Player6 balance 1110, didn't bet (folded)
Player7 balance 1955, didn't bet (folded)
Player8 balance 575, didn't bet (folded)
Player9 balance 1810, bet 1065, collected 1810, net +745 [ 6h 3h ] [ a flush, king high -- Kh,Jh,8h,6h,3h ]
Player10 balance 695, lost 15 (folded)



Anyone would have done some thing different? I can't believe he called a 100 raise with 63s.
Reply With Quote
toekneechin
Old 02-28-2004, 02:22 AM     Post subject: Can't believe this one (AKs vs 63s) #6 (permalink)  

Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 88
toekneechin
***** Hand History for Game 418782263 *****
15/30 TourneyTexasHTGameTable (NL) (Tournament 2458962) - Fri Feb 27 16:41:33 EST 2004
Table Card Room Table 4445 (Real Money) -- Seat 8 is the button
Total number of players : 9
Seat 1: Player1 (605)
Seat 3: Me (715)
Seat 4: Player4 (460)
Seat 5: Player5 (805)
Seat 6: Player6 (1110)
Seat 7: Player7 (1955)
Seat 8: Player8 (575)
Seat 9: Player9 (1065)
Seat 10: Player10 (710)
Player9 posts small blind (10)
Player10 posts big blind (15)
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to Me [ As, Ks ]
Player1 calls (15)
Me raises (100) to 100
Player4 folds.
Player5 folds.
Player6 folds.
Player7 folds.
Player8 folds.
Player6: uh, wow
Player9 calls (90)
Player10 folds.
Player1 folds.
** Dealing Flop ** : [ 6c, 8h, Jh ]
Player9 bets (70)
Me calls (70)
** Dealing Turn ** : [ Kh ]
Player9 bets (325)
Me calls (325)
** Dealing River ** : [ 5s ]
Player9 bets (570)
Player9 is all-In.
Me calls (220)
Me is all-In.
Creating Main Pot with $1460 with Me
Creating Side Pot 1 with $350 with Player9
** Summary **
Main Pot: 1460 | Side Pot 1: 350
Board: [ 6c 8h Jh Kh 5s ]
Player1 balance 590, lost 15 (folded)
Me balance 0, lost 715 [ As Ks ] [ a pair of kings -- As,Ks,Kh,Jh,8h ]
Player4 balance 460, didn't bet (folded)
Player5 balance 805, didn't bet (folded)
Player6 balance 1110, didn't bet (folded)
Player7 balance 1955, didn't bet (folded)
Player8 balance 575, didn't bet (folded)
Player9 balance 1810, bet 1065, collected 1810, net +745 [ 6h 3h ] [ a flush, king high -- Kh,Jh,8h,6h,3h ]
Player10 balance 695, lost 15 (folded)



Anyone would have done some thing different? I can't believe he called a 100 raise with 63s.
Reply With Quote
mike4066
Old 02-28-2004, 02:36 AM #7 (permalink)  
mike4066's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,943
mike4066
It doesn't matter that he held onto 63s, it could have been A6s the outcome would have been the exact same. He called preflop for the flush draw and hit it. Take note of his player name and make him pay for making less than great calls.

The problem I see with your play is that you didn't fold to the 325 bet when there were Three hearts on the board. Your holding top pair on the turn with 3 of a suit out. No matter what cards would card would have come you were drawing dead against the flush.
Reply With Quote
mike4066
Old 02-28-2004, 02:36 AM #8 (permalink)  
mike4066's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,943
mike4066
It doesn't matter that he held onto 63s, it could have been A6s the outcome would have been the exact same. He called preflop for the flush draw and hit it. Take note of his player name and make him pay for making less than great calls.

The problem I see with your play is that you didn't fold to the 325 bet when there were Three hearts on the board. Your holding top pair on the turn with 3 of a suit out. No matter what cards would card would have come you were drawing dead against the flush.
Reply With Quote
mike4066
Old 02-28-2004, 02:36 AM #9 (permalink)  
mike4066's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,943
mike4066
It doesn't matter that he held onto 63s, it could have been A6s the outcome would have been the exact same. He called preflop for the flush draw and hit it. Take note of his player name and make him pay for making less than great calls.

The problem I see with your play is that you didn't fold to the 325 bet when there were Three hearts on the board. Your holding top pair on the turn with 3 of a suit out. No matter what cards would card would have come you were drawing dead against the flush.
Reply With Quote
mike4066
Old 02-28-2004, 02:36 AM #10 (permalink)  
mike4066's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,943
mike4066
It doesn't matter that he held onto 63s, it could have been A6s the outcome would have been the exact same. He called preflop for the flush draw and hit it. Take note of his player name and make him pay for making less than great calls.

The problem I see with your play is that you didn't fold to the 325 bet when there were Three hearts on the board. Your holding top pair on the turn with 3 of a suit out. No matter what cards would card would have come you were drawing dead against the flush.
Reply With Quote
mike4066
Old 02-28-2004, 02:36 AM #11 (permalink)  
mike4066's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,943
mike4066
It doesn't matter that he held onto 63s, it could have been A6s the outcome would have been the exact same. He called preflop for the flush draw and hit it. Take note of his player name and make him pay for making less than great calls.

The problem I see with your play is that you didn't fold to the 325 bet when there were Three hearts on the board. Your holding top pair on the turn with 3 of a suit out. No matter what cards would card would have come you were drawing dead against the flush.
Reply With Quote
mike4066
Old 02-28-2004, 02:36 AM #12 (permalink)  
mike4066's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,943
mike4066
It doesn't matter that he held onto 63s, it could have been A6s the outcome would have been the exact same. He called preflop for the flush draw and hit it. Take note of his player name and make him pay for making less than great calls.

The problem I see with your play is that you didn't fold to the 325 bet when there were Three hearts on the board. Your holding top pair on the turn with 3 of a suit out. No matter what cards would card would have come you were drawing dead against the flush.
Reply With Quote
Fnord
Old 02-28-2004, 03:26 AM #13 (permalink)  
Fnord's Avatar
Moderator

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,334
Fnord is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via MSN to Fnord
Disclaimer: I'm not a very successful tournament player.

Dude that sucks.

My only thought is that early in a tournament it might be a strong laydown after the flop. 600 chips still gives you a solid position. That guy calling 100 chips with 63s will get his due.

Early tounament you want to take a couple chances (like this one), to pick up some chips, but you really want a minimum of 400 chips when you get down to 5-6 or so players and/or the big blind hits 50/100 chips. It's kinda odd, but the difference between ~400 chips and ~1000 chips is just one good hand once the blinds go up. If it doesn't come early, don't force it.
Reply With Quote
Fnord
Old 02-28-2004, 03:26 AM #14 (permalink)  
Fnord's Avatar
Moderator

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,334
Fnord is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via MSN to Fnord
Disclaimer: I'm not a very successful tournament player.

Dude that sucks.

My only thought is that early in a tournament it might be a strong laydown after the flop. 600 chips still gives you a solid position. That guy calling 100 chips with 63s will get his due.

Early tounament you want to take a couple chances (like this one), to pick up some chips, but you really want a minimum of 400 chips when you get down to 5-6 or so players and/or the big blind hits 50/100 chips. It's kinda odd, but the difference between ~400 chips and ~1000 chips is just one good hand once the blinds go up. If it doesn't come early, don't force it.
Reply With Quote
Fnord
Old 02-28-2004, 03:26 AM #15 (permalink)  
Fnord's Avatar
Moderator

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,334
Fnord is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via MSN to Fnord
Disclaimer: I'm not a very successful tournament player.

Dude that sucks.

My only thought is that early in a tournament it might be a strong laydown after the flop. 600 chips still gives you a solid position. That guy calling 100 chips with 63s will get his due.

Early tounament you want to take a couple chances (like this one), to pick up some chips, but you really want a minimum of 400 chips when you get down to 5-6 or so players and/or the big blind hits 50/100 chips. It's kinda odd, but the difference between ~400 chips and ~1000 chips is just one good hand once the blinds go up. If it doesn't come early, don't force it.
Reply With Quote
Fnord
Old 02-28-2004, 03:26 AM #16 (permalink)  
Fnord's Avatar
Moderator

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,334
Fnord is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via MSN to Fnord
Disclaimer: I'm not a very successful tournament player.

Dude that sucks.

My only thought is that early in a tournament it might be a strong laydown after the flop. 600 chips still gives you a solid position. That guy calling 100 chips with 63s will get his due.

Early tounament you want to take a couple chances (like this one), to pick up some chips, but you really want a minimum of 400 chips when you get down to 5-6 or so players and/or the big blind hits 50/100 chips. It's kinda odd, but the difference between ~400 chips and ~1000 chips is just one good hand once the blinds go up. If it doesn't come early, don't force it.
Reply With Quote
Fnord
Old 02-28-2004, 03:26 AM #17 (permalink)  
Fnord's Avatar
Moderator

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,334
Fnord is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via MSN to Fnord
Disclaimer: I'm not a very successful tournament player.

Dude that sucks.

My only thought is that early in a tournament it might be a strong laydown after the flop. 600 chips still gives you a solid position. That guy calling 100 chips with 63s will get his due.

Early tounament you want to take a couple chances (like this one), to pick up some chips, but you really want a minimum of 400 chips when you get down to 5-6 or so players and/or the big blind hits 50/100 chips. It's kinda odd, but the difference between ~400 chips and ~1000 chips is just one good hand once the blinds go up. If it doesn't come early, don't force it.
Reply With Quote
Fnord
Old 02-28-2004, 03:26 AM #18 (permalink)  
Fnord's Avatar
Moderator

Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,334
Fnord is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via MSN to Fnord
Disclaimer: I'm not a very successful tournament player.

Dude that sucks.

My only thought is that early in a tournament it might be a strong laydown after the flop. 600 chips still gives you a solid position. That guy calling 100 chips with 63s will get his due.

Early tounament you want to take a couple chances (like this one), to pick up some chips, but you really want a minimum of 400 chips when you get down to 5-6 or so players and/or the big blind hits 50/100 chips. It's kinda odd, but the difference between ~400 chips and ~1000 chips is just one good hand once the blinds go up. If it doesn't come early, don't force it.
Reply With Quote
Ragingguitarist18
Old 02-28-2004, 01:51 PM #19 (permalink)  
Straight

Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 235
Ragingguitarist18
I personally would have folded right after the flop, even with 70 chip bet. A-K is great because you're not "tied" on to it throughout the hand if nothing comes up on the board, compared to A-A or K-K.
Reply With Quote
Reply
Latest Poker News
KoRnholio Old 05-26-2012, 03:08 PM    Australia Legalized Online Poker coming up in next 6 to 12 Months
According to an email sent out by Mark Bryan, a gaming analyst at Merrill Lynch, the Australian government plans to legalize online poker sometime in the next six to 12 months. This move will coincide ...

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Thread Tools
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:41 AM.

Contact Us - Archive - Top

FTR Testimonials

All content
© FlopTurnRiver.com 		Advertising  |   Partners  |   Testimonials  |   T&C  |   Contact Us  |   FTR News & Press  |   Site Map  |   Search FTR

Full Tilt  |   Titan Poker  |   UltimateBet  |   Poker Stars  |   Ladbrokes Bonus  |   Sportsbook  |   Cake Poker  

Play Texas Holdem Online, Online Texas Holdem Strategy, & Poker Forum
This is not a gambling website.