|
gametight
|
09-21-2007, 02:37 AM
Post subject: Bad laydown??
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 494
|
|
100 NL FR
I have $115, villain covers
4players limp in
i limp in lp with 66
button limps ( he is TAGG reg running at 10/8/4, we havent tangled)
Flop comes 6h 7s As
utg bets 5
3folds
I raise to 16
Button makes it 41
HERO folds?
|
|
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
BankItDrew
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Losing Prop Bets
Posts: 2,789
|
|
no, hero pushes.
given the preflop action, button couldn't have AA, so 77 is the only hand you need to worry about.
2 pair, is exponentially more likely than a higher set.
i bet utg has the AA.... but push anyways. i only say this because hh are usually gross showdowns.
|
|
|
|
gametight
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 494
|
|
no everyone folded. I almost pushed but I thought I had to worry about utgs possible AA. I also thought he had to consider that too.
No showdown, so I guess Ill never know. Why cant people just check call for stax anmore!?
|
|
|
|
bigspenda73
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Pwnsylvania
Posts: 7,546
|
|
wow
|
|
|
|
Jack Sawyer
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Old School
Posts: 2,535
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by gametight
Bad laydown?
|
Yes. Don't fold sets here, k tnx.
|
My dream... is to fly... over the rainbow... so high...
Quote:
|
VHS is like a book and a book is like a stack of kindles.
|
Hey, I'm in a movie!
http://youtu.be/lGdnIrRKDTI
|
|
martindcx1e
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,614
|
|
it hurt my eyes to read this
wtf are you playing 66 for if you fold here?
|
|
Wikipedia is the best thing ever. Anyone in the world can write anything they want about any subject. So you know you are getting the best possible information.
|
|
Pelion
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,206
|
|
yea this is bad. Easy shove
|
|
gabe: Ive dropped almost 100k in the past 35 days.
bigspenda73: But how much did you win?
|
|
gametight
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 494
|
|
Isnt there any merit to trying not to loose a stack in an unraised pot? Do you guys really just shove here everytime against the tightest guy at the table???
|
|
|
|
Jack Sawyer
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Old School
Posts: 2,535
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by gametight
Isnt there any merit to trying not to loose a stack in an unraised pot? Do you guys really just shove here everytime against the tightest guy at the table???
|
Yes. As explained, you have to be afraid of only two hands here. You will get called by flushdraws and two pair a lot here.
Basically, in the long run, it is very unprofitable to fold sets.
|
My dream... is to fly... over the rainbow... so high...
Quote:
|
VHS is like a book and a book is like a stack of kindles.
|
Hey, I'm in a movie!
http://youtu.be/lGdnIrRKDTI
|
|
bigspenda73
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Pwnsylvania
Posts: 7,546
|
|
Tight does not mean passive
|
|
|
|
kmind
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Not Giving In
Posts: 4,240
|
|
I'd give anything to be able to get my money in with this board/situation
|
|
|
|
gametight
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 494
|
|
F _ U C K ! ! !
|
|
|
|
martindcx1e
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,614
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by gametight
F _ U C K ! ! !
|
indeed
|
|
Wikipedia is the best thing ever. Anyone in the world can write anything they want about any subject. So you know you are getting the best possible information.
|
|
bigspenda73
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Pwnsylvania
Posts: 7,546
|
|
actually, wait, I just noticed this is FullRing.
Yea, this could be a fold, I mean it's not, but it certainly could be.
|
|
|
|
daven
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: soaking up ethanol, moving on up
Posts: 5,813
|
|
I've decided not to fold flopped sets on the flop anymore unless....
actually, cut out the caveats. I'm just not gonna do it. And bet I win a lot more than I lose...
|
|
|
|
martindcx1e
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,614
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bigspenda73
Yea, this could be a fold, I mean it's not, but it certainly could be.
|
lol what does that mean?
|
|
Wikipedia is the best thing ever. Anyone in the world can write anything they want about any subject. So you know you are getting the best possible information.
|
|
Jack Sawyer
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Old School
Posts: 2,535
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by martindcx1e
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bigspenda73
Yea, this could be a fold, I mean it's not, but it certainly could be.
|
lol what does that mean? |
He means it could be, but its not. But it certainly could be, but its definitely not.
We need a wikipedia just to understand spenda
|
My dream... is to fly... over the rainbow... so high...
Quote:
|
VHS is like a book and a book is like a stack of kindles.
|
Hey, I'm in a movie!
http://youtu.be/lGdnIrRKDTI
|
|
martindcx1e
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,614
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jack Sawyer
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by martindcx1e
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bigspenda73
Yea, this could be a fold, I mean it's not, but it certainly could be.
|
lol what does that mean? |
He means it could be, but its not. But it certainly could be, but its definitely not. |
you just blew my mind
|
|
Wikipedia is the best thing ever. Anyone in the world can write anything they want about any subject. So you know you are getting the best possible information.
|
|
Unibomber14
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: The future
Posts: 321
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by martindcx1e
it hurt my eyes to read this
wtf are you playing 66 for if you fold here?
|
folding flopped set = REALLY BAD SET ODDS!
If the flop went 67K, would you fold? I mean, what if he has kings?
|
|
"$80 million Submarine mansion. Think about it."
|
|
Unibomber14
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: The future
Posts: 321
|
|
also,
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jack Sawyer
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by martindcx1e
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bigspenda73
Yea, this could be a fold, I mean it's not, but it certainly could be.
|
lol what does that mean? |
He means it could be, but its not. But it certainly could be, but its definitely not.
We need a wikipedia just to understand spenda |
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bigspenda73
"The game's chess; it aint checkers"
|
duh.
|
|
"$80 million Submarine mansion. Think about it."
|
|
Miffed22001
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Marry Me Cheryl!!!
Posts: 8,181
|
|
how many more threads im i going to have post in with 'dont fold sets on the flop with only 100bbs behind'
Im not fucking kidding either.
this is NOT a decison, puuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuush.
|
|
|
|
ChrisBCritter
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Falmouth, ME
Posts: 781
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Miffed22001
how many more threads im i going to have post in with 'dont fold sets on the flop with only 100bbs behind'
Im not fucking kidding either.
this is NOT a decison, puuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuush.
|
QFT.
There seems to be a rash of hands lately with people trying to fold sets... IDKY
|
|
Hey knucklehead! Bonk!
|
|
bigspenda73
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Pwnsylvania
Posts: 7,546
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by martindcx1e
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bigspenda73
Yea, this could be a fold, I mean it's not, but it certainly could be.
|
lol what does that mean? |
I mean against the right opponent I could see folding this. However, the board has a flush draw and hands like A7/A6 will want to felt as well. It's a lot closer than everyone is making it and I myself, Miff, am getting tired of your blanket answer here.
It's Full Ring, he has bottom set in a limped pot, and a player with a tight image is being very aggressive. FWIW I'm not that giddy to get all the money in here, but I still do. I don't think he has a draw too much cuz he'd just shove the flop, so I'm putting him on 77/AK/A6/A7/8s9s/4s5s which we are ahead of but just barely but I weight it severly towards 77/8s9s/4s5s but like i said I think he just shoves with 8s9s/4s5s type hands.
Yea, the more I look at it the more I think it's 77/combo-draw. We still have UTG left to act behind us, so it's really meh, really meh. Why can't UTG have AA?
Frankly I'm just sick and tired of everyone giving the same standard response in every thread.
|
|
|
|
martindcx1e
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,614
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bigspenda73
Frankly I'm just sick and tired of everyone giving the same standard response in every thread.
|
and we are just tired of ppl folding when they are ahead of opponent's range.
|
|
Wikipedia is the best thing ever. Anyone in the world can write anything they want about any subject. So you know you are getting the best possible information.
|
|
bigspenda73
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Pwnsylvania
Posts: 7,546
|
|
Last time I checked gametight was a winning player, maybe some of you could learn a little from the way he thinks.
|
|
|
|
Cocco_Bill
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,254
|
|
push push..stuff you are beating: 67 A7 A6 87s 45s 87 etc you are really only worried about 77 and if UTG has AA pay him off and smile
|
|
|
|
Miffed22001
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Marry Me Cheryl!!!
Posts: 8,181
|
|
89s is soooooo in his range here.
|
|
|
|
martindcx1e
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,614
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bigspenda73
Last time I checked gametight was a winning player, maybe some of you could learn a little from the way he thinks.
|
to me it looks like gametight learned from the rest of us not to fold in spots like this. i'm not sure what we are supposed to be learning from him in this thread.
|
|
Wikipedia is the best thing ever. Anyone in the world can write anything they want about any subject. So you know you are getting the best possible information.
|
|
NLHE lahooozaher
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 916
|
|
I don't understand the worry about UTG here. It seems OP just left out what UTG did because UTG bets, hero raises, button reraises, and action should be on UTG and we see what he does so he is of no concern here.
I think this is a bad fold, w/e. It's pretty close as bigspenda says. I'm not happy getting all in here, but I do.
|
|
|
|
Miffed22001
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Marry Me Cheryl!!!
Posts: 8,181
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bigspenda73
Last time I checked gametight was a winning player, maybe some of you could learn a little from the way he thinks.
|
i dont mean to sound patronizing, but its small stakes and he has a set.
who the fuck folds because it MIGHT be set over set.
If we have to fold set over set to maintain a positive bbs/100 then we fucking suck at poker. Otherwise such a spot should lead to us getting stacked because our hand is so strong, plus it has sooooo much equity.
We also have no guarantee he has set making any discussion of folding irrelevant. Our opponents cannot be given enough credit for us to fold here.
*shakes head*
|
|
|
|
martindcx1e
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,614
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Miffed22001
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bigspenda73
Last time I checked gametight was a winning player, maybe some of you could learn a little from the way he thinks.
|
i dont mean to sound patronizing, but its small stakes and he has a set.
who the fuck folds because it MIGHT be set over set.
If we have to fold set over set to maintain a positive bbs/100 then we fucking suck at poker. Otherwise such a spot should lead to us getting stacked because our hand is so strong, plus it has sooooo much equity.
We also have no guarantee he has set making any discussion of folding irrelevant. Our opponents cannot be given enough credit for us to fold here.
*shakes head* |
lol ya spenda what's the deal man? are you just trying to get a rise out of us?
|
|
Wikipedia is the best thing ever. Anyone in the world can write anything they want about any subject. So you know you are getting the best possible information.
|
|
bigspenda73
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Pwnsylvania
Posts: 7,546
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by martindcx1e
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Miffed22001
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bigspenda73
Last time I checked gametight was a winning player, maybe some of you could learn a little from the way he thinks.
|
i dont mean to sound patronizing, but its small stakes and he has a set.
who the fuck folds because it MIGHT be set over set.
If we have to fold set over set to maintain a positive bbs/100 then we fucking suck at poker. Otherwise such a spot should lead to us getting stacked because our hand is so strong, plus it has sooooo much equity.
We also have no guarantee he has set making any discussion of folding irrelevant. Our opponents cannot be given enough credit for us to fold here.
*shakes head* |
lol ya spenda what's the deal man? are you just trying to get a rise out of us? |
I'm not saying folding is correct but I see way too many of you guys as calling stations here. In fact, pretty much all of you. I like the fact that fold actually goes through Mix's mind here, it shows a higher level of thinking about the actions in the hand. However, he may have leveled himself, as this most likely is not a fold. I can see against the right player that this is a fold. What if villain plays draws passively? If that's the case we're pretty much praying for A7.
I'm not saying to play the hand like he did, but there's nothing wrong with actually thinking about our opponents hand ranges instead of going "durrrrr, we're 100bb deep, I guess I just shove cuz that's what Miff says all the time"
|
|
|
|
Muzzard
|
|
09-23-2007, 05:03 PM
Post subject: Re: Bad laydown??
|
#33 (permalink)
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Cheshire, UK
Posts: 1,843
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by gametight
Flop comes 6h 7s As
utg bets 5
3folds
I raise to 16
Button makes it 41
HERO folds?
|
Wait, UTG has to act first. If UTG 4-bets this flop then we can start thinking about folding. If he folds I think its an easy push, if he calls IDK it's a tricky one - I don't think I could get away from it.
I'd be more worried about what UTG does as there are less hands in his range, not really worried about button as he could easily have FD/two pair/straight or combo draw as well as a set. We are well ahead of most of the range, just because he is tight preflop doesn't mean he isn't aggro post flop with draws
|
|
|
|
martindcx1e
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,614
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bigspenda73
I'm not saying to play the hand like he did, but there's nothing wrong with actually thinking about our opponents hand ranges instead of going "durrrrr, we're 100bb deep, I guess I just shove cuz that's what Miff says all the time"
|
we are all saying auto-shove bc we are way ahead of opponent's range, which is almost always the case when we hold a set, which is why we always say don't fold. the times that we aren't ahead of their range are so rare that it's safe to say never fold.
|
|
Wikipedia is the best thing ever. Anyone in the world can write anything they want about any subject. So you know you are getting the best possible information.
|
|
Miffed22001
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Marry Me Cheryl!!!
Posts: 8,181
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bigspenda73
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by martindcx1e
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Miffed22001
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bigspenda73
Last time I checked gametight was a winning player, maybe some of you could learn a little from the way he thinks.
|
i dont mean to sound patronizing, but its small stakes and he has a set.
who the fuck folds because it MIGHT be set over set.
If we have to fold set over set to maintain a positive bbs/100 then we fucking suck at poker. Otherwise such a spot should lead to us getting stacked because our hand is so strong, plus it has sooooo much equity.
We also have no guarantee he has set making any discussion of folding irrelevant. Our opponents cannot be given enough credit for us to fold here.
*shakes head* |
lol ya spenda what's the deal man? are you just trying to get a rise out of us? |
I'm not saying folding is correct but I see way too many of you guys as calling stations here. In fact, pretty much all of you. I like the fact that fold actually goes through Mix's mind here, it shows a higher level of thinking about the actions in the hand. However, he may have leveled himself, as this most likely is not a fold. I can see against the right player that this is a fold. What if villain plays draws passively? If that's the case we're pretty much praying for A7.
I'm not saying to play the hand like he did, but there's nothing wrong with actually thinking about our opponents hand ranges instead of going "durrrrr, we're 100bb deep, I guess I just shove cuz that's what Miff says all the time" |
i really havent wanted to make this statement before, and after winning 67k i probably have no right, although ive made my way to 1/2 2/4 without luckboxxing it, but what stakes are you playing spenda that folding a SET is +EV?
Otherwise the arguement of folding here is irrelevant. As soon as you add in one hand that isnt a set into opps range you MUST felt your hand.
If this pot were raised would you ask us to fold?
Also, would you fold a boat just because the possibilty existed your opponent might have a straight flush...?
|
|
|
|
bigspenda73
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Pwnsylvania
Posts: 7,546
|
|
I play the same stakes as Mix but at 6max. It's a game with different dynamics really, full ring that is. It's more of a game of cards than of players. TAGG's at his level aren't 3betting the flop with combo-draws, they're either calling/pushing/folding. I mean, take a look at the action. Why in the world would you 3bet to 41 with a draw? Nah, he has 77/A7/67s and it's weighted to 77 a lot.
|
|
|
|
Muzzard
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Cheshire, UK
Posts: 1,843
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bigspenda73
Why in the world would you 3bet to 41 with a draw?
|
Maybe UTG and Villain are deeper than Hero? Villain is three betting the combo draw so he could consider folding to a UTG 4-bet or shove. If UTG folds and Hero shoves he is priced in with 40% equity versus a set anyway if he has 8s9s.
If UTG and and Villain are roughly as deep as Hero then I'm leaning toward your way of thinking now. It is more likely to be A7/A6/67s or 77, still though we are beating three of those 4 hands and I can't find a fold.
It's more interesting if UTG 4-bets/shoves the flop, I think it would be right to fold then unless he is terrible. That would be one situation where I could press the fold button with a set
|
|
|
|
Miffed22001
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Marry Me Cheryl!!!
Posts: 8,181
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bigspenda73
I play the same stakes as Mix but at 6max. It's a game with different dynamics really, full ring that is. It's more of a game of cards than of players. TAGG's at his level aren't 3betting the flop with combo-draws, they're either calling/pushing/folding. I mean, take a look at the action. Why in the world would you 3bet to 41 with a draw? Nah, he has 77/A7/67s and it's weighted to 77 a lot.
|
so you're telling me that 100% of the time in this spot he has AA or 77...
|
|
|
|
bigspenda73
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Pwnsylvania
Posts: 7,546
|
|
Miffed, why is it so hard to believe that we could actually be behind in the hand?
I think A LOT of the time we're up against 77 here, I don't think a draw plays this way, so in my mind we're hoping for A7s. I mean, give me a break dude, you haven't given any argument for why your range is correct and all you've been trying to do is find a way to maintain your "folding a set..." blah blah blah bullshit.
I mean, stop with the fucking one-line horseshit already. Seriosuly it's really pissing me off, poker is much more than a one-liner game. He has a range of hands with each action, through my reasoning his range has been dwindled down to only a few hands, and granted against his "range" we're behind slight but getting a good price, but if we weight it much more to 77 than A7 we're well behind and cannot continue. Once again, you've done nothing at all to prove your point, only tried to disprove mine. Why?
|
|
|
|
Vi-Zer0Skill
|
|
Reagan's Kid
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,742
|
|
folding a set for 100BB's in a limped pot is different than folding a set for 100BB's in a raised pot.
Here's a pokerstove, for what i would percieve villain's range to be:
Board: 6h 7s As
Dead:
equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 36.869% 36.87% 00.00% 4380 0.00 { AcAs, 77, A7s, A7o }
Hand 1: 63.131% 63.13% 00.00% 7500 0.00 { 6c6d }
A-A is heavily discounted as it is button who is giving Hero the action.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Carroters
Ambition is fucking great, but you're trying to dig up gold with a rocket launcher and are going to blow the whole lot to shit unless you refine your tools
|
|
|
Vi-Zer0Skill
|
|
Reagan's Kid
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,742
|
|
Take A-7o out, and Hero is no longer favored against villain's range. Add more A-A combinations, and the same thing happens obviously.
It's worth getting all in with the dead money in the pot, regardless.
Board: 6h 7s As
Dead:
equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 62.496% 62.50% 00.00% 4331 0.00 { AcAd, 77, A7s }
Hand 1: 37.504% 37.50% 00.00% 2599 0.00 { 6c6d }
---
Board: 6h 7s As
Dead:
equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 69.865% 69.87% 00.00% 6225 0.00 { AA, 77, A7s }
Hand 1: 30.135% 30.13% 00.00% 2685 0.00 { 6c6d }
---
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Carroters
Ambition is fucking great, but you're trying to dig up gold with a rocket launcher and are going to blow the whole lot to shit unless you refine your tools
|
|
|
martindcx1e
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,614
|
|
A6s and 67s have to be part of the range too.
|
|
Wikipedia is the best thing ever. Anyone in the world can write anything they want about any subject. So you know you are getting the best possible information.
|
|
bigspenda73
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Pwnsylvania
Posts: 7,546
|
|
only 1 six left in the deck....
|
|
|
|
martindcx1e
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,614
|
|
it's definitely more likely than AA imo
|
|
Wikipedia is the best thing ever. Anyone in the world can write anything they want about any subject. So you know you are getting the best possible information.
|
|
Miffed22001
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Marry Me Cheryl!!!
Posts: 8,181
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bigspenda73
Miffed, why is it so hard to believe that we could actually be behind in the hand?
I think A LOT of the time we're up against 77 here, I don't think a draw plays this way, so in my mind we're hoping for A7s. I mean, give me a break dude, you haven't given any argument for why your range is correct and all you've been trying to do is find a way to maintain your "folding a set..." blah blah blah bullshit.
I mean, stop with the fucking one-line horseshit already. Seriosuly it's really pissing me off, poker is much more than a one-liner game. He has a range of hands with each action, through my reasoning his range has been dwindled down to only a few hands, and granted against his "range" we're behind slight but getting a good price, but if we weight it much more to 77 than A7 we're well behind and cannot continue. Once again, you've done nothing at all to prove your point, only tried to disprove mine. Why?
|
having read the first line reread my posts. It isnt a case of us being behind its a case of how much equity do we have in this spot versus opp's range. Answer: too much not to be felting.
|
|
|
|
bigspenda73
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Pwnsylvania
Posts: 7,546
|
|
if we determine that opp's range does NOT include draws, is felting actually better than calling?
|
|
|
English
Deutsch
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Pусский
Svenska
06-01-2012, 11:03 AM White House Responds to Poker Players Alliance's Petition
Linear Mode
