|
pokerfan
|
08-10-2008, 12:59 PM
Post subject: AK limp/reraise UTG in live 200NL
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: NS, Canada
Posts: 1,736
|
|
The table was extremely loose aggressive. Mp2($80) just lost a massive pot and was ready to shove all his chips towards the center of the table. CO($900) and Button($1100) were both uber loose aggressive donks preflop/postflop and hit lots of runner-runner flushes and 4 card straight rivers. My image was a tight passive unimaginative rock.
Hero($330) picked up AKo UTG and decided to limp/reraise back, UTG1 ($42) called, MP2($80) shoved $80, CO($900) called, Button($1100) raised to $200, Hero??
my original game plan was limp/reraise and rep AA/KK but didnt expect such heavy actions. Do you guys still shove as well in this situation in live games?
|
|
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
Fnord
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,334
|
|
$200 buy-in?
I'd ship it, AK holds up well 3-way.
If it was Tens or Jacks I'd dump it. Queens I hate life.
|
|
|
|
pokerfan
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: NS, Canada
Posts: 1,736
|
|
yeah, its $200 buy-in. Seriously, i'd dump AK,TT-QQ this deep in online 100/200 NL FR games. As played, Its just freaking hilarious in the card room at casino. Hero shoved, UTG1 called with A2o, CO folded, Button called with ATs, MP2 pushed with 99.
hero hit runner runner trip kings :P Its fucking why our live games are a lot softer and much more profitable than online games.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Fnord
$200 buy-in?
I'd ship it, AK holds up well 3-way.
If it was Tens or Jacks I'd dump it. Queens I hate life.
|
|
|
|
|
Fnord
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,334
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by pokerfan
more profitable than online games.
|
$$$/hand : yes
$$$/hour : not unless you're playing in really good uncapped games and aren't very good playing against TAggs.
|
|
|