|
apunisher
|
06-12-2006, 08:33 PM
Post subject: 87s from sb: How's my line?
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 398
|
|
Party Poker
No Limit Holdem Ring game
Blinds: $0.25/$0.50
10 players
Converter
Stack sizes:
UTG: $62.58
UTG+1: $30.34
UTG+2: $9.85
MP1: $51.50
MP2: $61.90
MP3: $50.57
CO: $87.27
Button: $47.95
Hero: $64.70
BB: $76.41
Pre-flop: (10 players) Hero is SB with 8 7
2 folds, UTG+2 calls, 2 folds, MP3 calls, CO folds, Button calls, Hero calls, BB checks.
Flop: T 9 3 ($2.5, 5 players)
Hero bets $1.75, BB folds, UTG+2 calls, MP3 calls, Button calls.
Turn: 5 ($9.5, 4 players)
Hero bets $6.5, UTG+2 folds, MP3 calls, Button folds.
River: J ($22.5, 2 players)
Hero bets $12, MP3 raises all-in $41.82, Hero calls.
Results:
Final pot: $106.14
|
|
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
freechus9
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: IN UR BOX HAXXING UR FILEZ
Posts: 1,000
|
|
I'd check/call the river on the chance that he has a higher flush. If you lost this hand, I'm assuming that's what he had.
|
|
My sig is too much for you to handle.
|
|
Fnord
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,334
|
|
I think I could sometimes find a fold on this river.
|
|
|
|
jackvance
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,910
|
|
Your play looks fine, probably fold the river.. what is he gonna have here besides a higher flush? Hard to fold this though..
|
|
Sarcasm is your body's natural defense against stupidity
|
|
apunisher
|
|
Flush
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 398
|
|
If you looked at my line, does it look like a flush? Because i was trying to conceal it by leading out-or does my lead out make it look like i was on fd on flop and turn?
|
|
|
|
dalecooper
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,107
|
|
A lot of players lead with flush draws now - it's just not very concealing. Hard to put him on anything but a flush, from his megabet on the river. I agree with Fnord, I could find a fold here - but it would be a crying fold for sure. I haven't folded flushes often on unpaired boards, but if ever there was an occasion that looked like a fold, this was one.
|
|
|
|
andy-akb
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Maine
Posts: 1,836
|
|
Can we really find a fold against an unknown? There were no reads, stats, etc. posted in the OP, Id be hardpressed to find a fold here against an unknown, but maybe thats a leak on my part.
|
|
|
|
dalecooper
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,107
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by andy-akb
Can we really find a fold against an unknown? There were no reads, stats, etc. posted in the OP, Id be hardpressed to find a fold here against an unknown, but maybe thats a leak on my part.
|
In a 5-way pot where it was very apparent that a flush was the winning hand, and my flush was only eight high, and my opponent was pushing after I strongly led all three streets... I think I could find a fold against this here unknown.
|
|
|
|
Fnord
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: I'll Do You Like A Truck
Posts: 19,334
|
|
If this was raised pre-flop I would almost never get away from this. In an unraised multi-way pot, we need to seriously consider that our hand is no good.
|
|
|
|
andy-akb
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Maine
Posts: 1,836
|
|
If the hand played out the same way but we had a queen high flush would we call the push?
|
|
|
|
dalecooper
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,107
|
|
Grey area; I'm definitely calling with the king high, and probably with the queen high as well. Beyond that it gets very questionable.
|
|
|
|
Warpe
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Canuckistan
Posts: 3,905
|
|
Anyone check/call a value bet, fold to a push on this river?
|
|
|
|
IowaSkinsFan
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 7,148
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by freechus9
I'd check/call the river on the chance that he has a higher flush. If you lost this hand, I'm assuming that's what he had.
|
I'd say you made a good assumption.....
|
|
|