|
daven
|
06-27-2008, 12:50 AM
Post subject: 50nl vs 100nl on Full Tilt
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: soaking up ethanol, moving on up
Posts: 5,807
|
|
ok, so this bankroll nit has finally moved up.
I've made one main adjustment - i got in touch with FT support and no longer have to play across multiple sites to play 10+ tables. I now realise that such multiple site play was probably very -EV, and I've got rid of the PT3 HUD problems at the same time. I'm also only playing 10 tables while I get comfortable with the bet and pot sizing.
So far, players seem more monotonous and sometimes a little more tricky. Not terrifying though (still not much 3-betting), and maybe more fit-or-fold types? and the fish seem fishier.
anything in particular i should be careful of/looking out for?
Anyone else got observations about this move?
I'll post my stats after 10k hands for some assistance.
|
|
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
d0zer
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,524
|
|
With my move from 50-100 I didn't notice a whole lot of change at all.
A little more aggressive preflop. Don't change your game, just keep playing the villain. You won't find entirely different beasts, just a bit more of some types, and a bit less of others.
|
|
|
|
ATOTHEC101
|
|
Full House
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,248
|
|
the majority of the players are really similiar to 50nl, the only difference being youll come across a ton more regs and slightly less fish but they nearly all play a really exploitable nitty 10/8 so there not hard to play against. Also the regs are alot more positionally aware and ive found will steal your blinds in lp repeatedly unless you fight back so 3 betting light on occasion is a must as they nearly always fold.
Just basically play aggressive and loser than you did at 50nl, i played like 12/9 for 17k hands at 100nl and won around $400, i sort of realised than unless i was on a heater i was never gonna make enough money playing this style so the last 12k hands ive been playing around 21/15 mainly in position taking advantage of the fact im better than most of the players at this level and since ive made this change ive made a hell of alot more than i did previously.
|
|
"This sure beats Super Mario Bros.!" is my ejaculation catch phrase.
|
|
jimmy44
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Place where I can spew
Posts: 1,391
|
|
I play on Ongame, but my experience shows that players at 100NL are worse then 50NL.
Why I say they are worth? In average they are more Laggy in 100NL that in 50NL. However, they are not (in average) good at it! So you'll get payed off regularly and more often if you exploit this!
|
|
|
|
badgers
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Spewing
Posts: 3,372
|
|
I dunno why but I agree. It may be that there are more live game players at 100nl.
|
3k post - Return of the blog!
|
English
Deutsch
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Pусский
Svenska
05-26-2012, 03:08 PM Australia Legalized Online Poker coming up in next 6 to 12 Months
Linear Mode
