|
caddie444
|
06-22-2010, 05:55 AM
Post subject: 50K hand stat checkup by position - 50NL
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: constantly UTG
Posts: 723
|
|
Well I figured I may as well throw up my stats and see if you guys can see anything worth improving on. This is 50NL: and as you can see I play a pretty nitty 13/10 game with around a 3% 3Bet.
Also stats not shown are:
Vs 3Bet fold% - 60.8%
Vs 4Bet fold% - 40.7%
Just looking at this I'd like my 3Bet stat to be around 7-8% on the button, and I think I should be 3-Betting more from the blinds...
Also I think I should def be c-betting more
Anything else you guys notice?
|
Don't complain; Just work harder - Randy Pausch (The Last Lecture)
|
Play for FREE and practice your game at...
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
|
|
Deanglow
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: lol
Posts: 2,443
|
|
I think what you need now more than anything is confidence. You seem to be playing/running well and should move up with the momentum. Not much difference between .5/1 and .25/.5 so play more hands, keep doing what feels right and post hands you're unsure of.
|
|
|
|
daven
|
|
Straight Flush
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: soaking up ethanol, moving on up
Posts: 5,805
|
|
dude, looks good. I don't see any reason to increase your bu 3-bet %, May want to think about blind play some more, but don't go changing anything as you move up. Definitely don't move to anything near my 20% vpip from both blinds cos that's lfdo not optimal.
Also, re being a nit. It's nit-ring, lagtardish players may be annoying to play against, but they typically don't make heaps of money (some notable exceptions, but few and far between). There are some pretty huge winning 13-10s around - check doublefly's blog and there's a post a while back where he lists regs stats - basically all the high volume heavy winners are between 11-8 and 16-12.
|
|
|
|
Outlaw
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,033
|
|
W$WSF is normally in the 40%-44% range for most winning players.. you might be giving up too much when ahead. Could be sample size. PTbb of 2.0 for 50NL is solid. You might want to go ahead and move up.. you have 50 buy ins for it which should make it pretty comfortable.
|
|
|
|
caddie444
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: constantly UTG
Posts: 723
|
|
Thanks guys for the insights, you guys around the same % for me as c-betting flop/turn? I feel as though this should be higher?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deanglow
Not much difference between .5/1 and .25/.5
|
Def good to hear that!
Quote:
Originally Posted by daven
Also, re being a nit. It's nit-ring, lagtardish players may be annoying to play against, but they typically don't make heaps of money (some notable exceptions, but few and far between). There are some pretty huge winning 13-10s around - check doublefly's blog and there's a post a while back where he lists regs stats - basically all the high volume heavy winners are between 11-8 and 16-12.
|
Thanks for the info, will def check that out
|
Don't complain; Just work harder - Randy Pausch (The Last Lecture)
|
|
caddie444
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: constantly UTG
Posts: 723
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Outlaw
W$WSF is normally in the 40%-44% range for most winning players..
|
hmm gonna do some research on this
|
Don't complain; Just work harder - Randy Pausch (The Last Lecture)
|
|
Outlaw
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,033
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by caddie444
hmm gonna do some research on this
|
I'm not one to rely to heavily on stats, so take that with a grain of salt. I used to have what I considered "perfect" stats and had a much crappier win-rate than I do now... and now my stats are very flawed by most people's standards.
|
|
|
|
badgers
|
|
4-of-a-Kind
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Spewing
Posts: 3,372
|
|
looking good. Move up and keep working on your game 
|
3k post - Return of the blog!
|
|
Imthenewfish
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: sites im allowed to play on
Posts: 945
|
|
Why aren't VPIP and PFR closer together on the BTN? Don't we end up isolating in limped pots a lot more often than overlimping?
|
|
|
|
caddie444
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: constantly UTG
Posts: 723
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Imthenewfish
Why aren't VPIP and PFR closer together on the BTN? Don't we end up isolating in limped pots a lot more often than overlimping?
|
Remember VPIP means that I am also flatting opens on the button as well as overlimping on occasion, though I do tend to isolate more often than overlimping.
|
Don't complain; Just work harder - Randy Pausch (The Last Lecture)
|
|
Imthenewfish
|
|
Full House
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: sites im allowed to play on
Posts: 945
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by caddie444
Remember VPIP means that I am also flatting opens on the button as well as overlimping on occasion, though I do tend to isolate more often than overlimping.
|
Oic
|
|
|
English
Deutsch
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Pусский
Svenska
05-26-2012, 03:08 PM Australia Legalized Online Poker coming up in next 6 to 12 Months
Linear Mode
