Poker Forum

Over 1,246,000 Posts!

Subscribe to FTR web feed
Already Registered?      Username:    Password:   Remember      Forgot Password
  >    > 

10k checkup #3: 25nl

  
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
dev
Old 03-13-2008, 12:52 AM     Post subject: 10k checkup #3: 25nl #1 (permalink)  
dev's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: swonging and swonging
Posts: 1,550
dev
Send a message via AIM to dev Send a message via MSN to dev Send a message via Yahoo to dev
God I started out running horrible. PokerEV had my expectation and showdown winnings over $100 apart after 1500 hands. It evened out a bit by the end, but I think the early losses got to me a bit, hence the next 3500 hands...



first 5500 hands:
18/15/4
-$38.90
-1.42ptbb/100

next 4500:
15/13/4.5
+$344.2
15.09ptbb/100

overall:
17/14/4
+305.3
6.07ptbb/100

At first I was astounded by how many short stacks there were. They gave me trouble at first and shook my confidence a bit. I posted a few hands, read anything I could find on them and now I'm happy to see a table full of shorties. I scaled back my requirements for playing a hand a bit, this 10k is a bit tighter than the last one (18/15/4 vs 17/14/4, then 15/13/4.5 for the last 4500 hands)
I made some adjustments to my multi-tabling setup. I was 8-tabling tiled fast tables, by the end I was 12-tabling cascaded normal speed tables, I pull one or two interesting tables to the side and watch them while I wait for hands. I'm close to where I wanted to be for 50nl, but still short. This is irrelevant because I've decided to change my bankroll requirements significantly. I'm off to start an operation...

Any help is greatly appreciated!
Reply With Quote
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
spoonitnow
Old 03-13-2008, 02:10 AM #2 (permalink)  
spoonitnow's Avatar
Straight Flush

Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: IRC Chat Room
Posts: 5,406
spoonitnow is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to spoonitnow Send a message via MSN to spoonitnow Send a message via Yahoo to spoonitnow Send a message via Skype™ to spoonitnow
Everything looks fine to me in terms of stats.

I also prefer playing only normal speed tables as well. Even when you're playing more tables than you would if you were only playing fast tables, you get the same hands/hour without being rushed on important decisions.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ripptyde
I only have 2 simple rules when I am coaching a new student.

Rule # 1: don't ask questions

Rule # 2: don't ask questions

I have no interest in discussing strategy with a protege'. Your job is to remain quiet and listen. I have a very systematic approach that I will share with the right candidate and I promise that I will turn you into a force of nature and show you elements of the game of poker that you never knew existed.
 
Reply With Quote
dev
Old 03-13-2008, 02:17 AM #3 (permalink)  
dev's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: swonging and swonging
Posts: 1,550
dev
Send a message via AIM to dev Send a message via MSN to dev Send a message via Yahoo to dev
Quote:
Originally Posted by spoonitnow
I also prefer playing only normal speed tables as well. Even when you're playing more tables than you would if you were only playing fast tables, you get the same hands/hour without being rushed on important decisions.
That was my thinking. I get just a few more hands in /hour, but I don't feel rushed even with 12 tables. I might add a few more, maybe not... my laptop can't really handle more than 12.
Check out my self-deprecation here!
 
Reply With Quote
spoonitnow
Old 03-13-2008, 10:41 AM #4 (permalink)  
spoonitnow's Avatar
Straight Flush

Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: IRC Chat Room
Posts: 5,406
spoonitnow is on a distinguished road
Send a message via AIM to spoonitnow Send a message via MSN to spoonitnow Send a message via Yahoo to spoonitnow Send a message via Skype™ to spoonitnow
Quote:
Originally Posted by dev
Quote:
Originally Posted by spoonitnow
I also prefer playing only normal speed tables as well. Even when you're playing more tables than you would if you were only playing fast tables, you get the same hands/hour without being rushed on important decisions.
That was my thinking. I get just a few more hands in /hour, but I don't feel rushed even with 12 tables. I might add a few more, maybe not... my laptop can't really handle more than 12.
What makes multitabling difficult in full ring is when you have to make two decisions at once that require more than a moment's consideration. Then you're often forced to rush your decision on one table just so you can get to another. With normal tables, this isn't so much of a factor, even if you're playing more tables.

Even when doing videos, I used to prefer four fast tables so I could get more hands in, but I found myself timing out often during explanations. With four normal tables, I might get in a few less hands per hour, but I can explain things and take my time when I want to without the fear of timing out.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ripptyde
I only have 2 simple rules when I am coaching a new student.

Rule # 1: don't ask questions

Rule # 2: don't ask questions

I have no interest in discussing strategy with a protege'. Your job is to remain quiet and listen. I have a very systematic approach that I will share with the right candidate and I promise that I will turn you into a force of nature and show you elements of the game of poker that you never knew existed.
 
Reply With Quote
pokerfan
Old 03-13-2008, 03:16 PM #5 (permalink)  
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: NS, Canada
Posts: 1,736
pokerfan
A little bit loose and aggressive preflop imo. However, if you feel comfortable and really crush your games, just go for it , why not?:P
once i get my new powerful PC next week, i should be able to play 10+ tables
Reply With Quote
XTR1000
Old 03-13-2008, 03:29 PM #6 (permalink)  
XTR1000's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: May 2006
Location: surfing in a room
Posts: 2,188
XTR1000 is an unknown quantity at this point
Send a message via AIM to XTR1000
Awesome TAGgy preflop imo, not much to argue with the stats u posted.

I´m very comfy w/ 16/14/4 (my pc could, but I can´t handle more than 9 tables playing that fast), my att. 2 steal is fairly higher at 36% I guess, 32% should still be near optimal tho.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigred View Post
xtr stand for exotic tranny retards
yo
 
Reply With Quote
dev
Old 03-13-2008, 07:52 PM #7 (permalink)  
dev's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: swonging and swonging
Posts: 1,550
dev
Send a message via AIM to dev Send a message via MSN to dev Send a message via Yahoo to dev
Quote:
Originally Posted by XTR1000
Awesome TAGgy preflop imo, not much to argue with the stats u posted.

I´m very comfy w/ 16/14/4 (my pc could, but I can´t handle more than 9 tables playing that fast), my att. 2 steal is fairly higher at 36% I guess, 32% should still be near optimal tho.
This is kinda weird to me, because it seems like I steal every chance I get. I'm missing some, better keep that in mind.

Thanks!
Check out my self-deprecation here!
 
Reply With Quote
GatorJH
Old 03-14-2008, 02:23 AM #8 (permalink)  
GatorJH's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: HotLanta
Posts: 3,179
GatorJH will become famous soon enough
Send a message via AIM to GatorJH
I think I need to add tables one at a time. I went from 4 to 7 last night and thought I was going crazy. I don't think it helps that my notebook monitor just isn't that big (I was in a hotel) so I had 3 of them overlayed on top of other tables.

Btw, when you either tile or cascade the tables do you do it manually? The one time I had Windows tile them it REALLY screwed up the resolution on the tables.
Poker is easy, it's winning at poker that's hard.
 
Reply With Quote
dev
Old 03-14-2008, 05:29 PM #9 (permalink)  
dev's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: swonging and swonging
Posts: 1,550
dev
Send a message via AIM to dev Send a message via MSN to dev Send a message via Yahoo to dev
Quote:
Originally Posted by GatorJH
Btw, when you either tile or cascade the tables do you do it manually? The one time I had Windows tile them it REALLY screwed up the resolution on the tables.
Well, I generally have pokerstars do it. When they tile it they make the tables small enough to fit as many as possible, then overlay them if they can't go any smaller. I switched to cascading in order to try to get more tables in, now I do it because it's just easier to focus on a specific table. At normal size I can't fit two tables in on my laptop without overlay, so even 6-tabling at the smallest size left me with plenty of overlay. My desktop has a much higher resolution, but i just like cascading better now. FOCUS.
Check out my self-deprecation here!
 
Reply With Quote
Reply
Latest Poker News
KoRnholio Old 05-26-2012, 03:08 PM    Australia Legalized Online Poker coming up in next 6 to 12 Months
According to an email sent out by Mark Bryan, a gaming analyst at Merrill Lynch, the Australian government plans to legalize online poker sometime in the next six to 12 months. This move will coincide ...

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 04:30 PM.


FTR Testimonials

All content
© FlopTurnRiver.com
Advertising  |   Partners  |   Testimonials  |   T&C  |   Contact Us  |   FTR News & Press  |   Site Map  |   Search FTR

Full Tilt  |   Titan Poker  |   UltimateBet  |   Poker Stars  |   Ladbrokes Bonus  |   Sportsbook  |   Cake Poker  

Play Texas Holdem Online, Online Texas Holdem Strategy, & Poker Forum
This is not a gambling website.