Poker Forum

Over 1,247,000 Posts!

Subscribe to FTR web feed
Already Registered?      Username:    Password:   Remember      Forgot Password
  >    > 

100NL pocket queens minor detail

  
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
SmackinYaUp
Old 08-23-2005, 04:02 AM     Post subject: 100NL pocket queens minor detail #1 (permalink)  
SmackinYaUp's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: B N L
Posts: 1,725
SmackinYaUp
This hand was played while doing homework and 3 tabling with no reads. Basically just nut peddling. This is me playing a fairly big pot in position with an overpair. The guy calls my big reraise and checks to me on the turn which screams either draw, AK'ish type cards, or monster. Is there any reason to bet the turn here?

I don't see any real draws here and am easily tied to the pot if I bet again. I would really rather control the size of the pot and if giving a free card means doing so, is it profitable in the long run? If I bet any decent amount on the turn, I'm either going to get cold called by someone weaktight with a better hand, cold called by a draw, or raised by something beating me. If I check behind and call the river I'm giving retarded hands more chances to bluff/bleed chips into me. What is the best play in this situation vs. 100NL donks in the long run?

Hand History:
View Previous hand for this table.

Texas Hold'em $1-$1 NL (real money), #1,195,072,861
Table Tamale, 22 Aug 2005 11:48 PM ET
Seat 1: lvnoffthedge ($98.50 in chips)
Seat 2: darkmanpi ($85 in chips)
Seat 3: jmont128 ($59.25 in chips)
Seat 4: the_chosen1 ($66 in chips)
Seat 5: The.Shredder ($105.75 in chips)
Seat 6: KQ_Suited ($100 in chips)
Seat 7: Dr.Maciek ($33.75 in chips)
Seat 8: sleepyt ($108.25 in chips)
Seat 9: F00SE1 ($91.75 in chips)
Seat 10: SlappinYaUp ($98.50 in chips)
ANTES/BLINDS
jmont128 posts blind ($0.50), the_chosen1 posts blind ($1).

SlappinYaUp gets [ QD,QH ]

PRE-FLOP
The.Shredder calls $1, KQ_Suited calls $1, Dr.Maciek folds, sleepyt folds, F00SE1 folds, SlappinYaUp bets $5, lvnoffthedge folds, darkmanpi folds, jmont128 calls $4.50, the_chosen1 calls $4, The.Shredder calls $4, KQ_Suited calls $4.

FLOP [board cards 4S,10D,6H ]
jmont128 checks, the_chosen1 bets $2, The.Shredder bets $9, KQ_Suited folds, SlappinYaUp bets $18, jmont128 folds, the_chosen1 folds, The.Shredder calls $9.

TURN [board cards 4S,10D,6H,3H ]
The.Shredder checks, SlappinYaUp checks.

RIVER [board cards 4S,10D,6H,3H,2D ]
The.Shredder bets $12, SlappinYaUp calls $12.
He who drinks beer sleeps well.
He who sleeps well cannot sin.
He who does not sin goes to Heaven.
 
Reply With Quote
Join the FTR Poker Forum to disable these banners and start posting!
Bmxicle
Old 08-23-2005, 07:20 AM #2 (permalink)  
Bmxicle's Avatar
Full House

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 947
Bmxicle
Send a message via AIM to Bmxicle
That looks like top pair to me, there aren't any realistic draws. I'd usually bet the turn, but the pot was getting pretty big and betting the turn would prolly make it get a bit out of control here, not to mention the fact that you don't really have a read, so i like the check behind.
 
Reply With Quote
Drewbie
Old 08-23-2005, 02:10 PM #3 (permalink)  

Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 88
Drewbie
That smells like K10-A10 here.

I dont know.... I might worry about a spiked set here.
Reply With Quote
journey075
Old 08-23-2005, 02:19 PM #4 (permalink)  
Full House

Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 725
journey075
i value-raise the river.
Reply With Quote
Rondavu
Old 08-23-2005, 02:23 PM #5 (permalink)  
Rondavu's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,053
Rondavu
You bet the turn because it's an obvious top pair. A set isn't raising a disconnected rainbow board on the flop if it knows what's good for it. Value bet the turn or just punch it.
It's not what's inside that counts. Have you seen what's inside?
Internal organs. And they're getting uglier by the minute.
 
Reply With Quote
Aces
Old 08-23-2005, 02:50 PM #6 (permalink)  
Aces's Avatar
Full House

Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 832
Aces
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rondavu
You bet the turn because it's an obvious top pair. A set isn't raising a disconnected rainbow board on the flop if it knows what's good for it. Value bet the turn or just punch it.
I would guess by Smackin's description("donk") that the villian had some strange hand, but would that be such a terrible way to play trips for this hand? Sure the standard/safe way would be to check, but he's gotta figure probably AK or a high pair with the PF bet. A bet w/a set(which could represent TPTK) would probably elicit a reraise by an overpair, which it did, and disguise his hand. Of course you couldn't give a donk credit for such a move unless it was sortof accidently tricky.

Would he really call a flop RR w/TPTK? I don't mind the turn check or river call.
Reply With Quote
DimitriT
Old 08-23-2005, 03:26 PM #7 (permalink)  
DimitriT's Avatar
Full House

Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 614
DimitriT
A limp/call from UTG pre-flop can be either small/medium pockets or weak high-cards (AQos, AJ, ATs, KQs). Here I am worried about a slow-played set. There's nothing threatening on the board so a this is ideal for a slow-play and there's no draw. If he is playing a set, the turn is where he will check to the raiser and build the pot. I think checking behind is a reasonable play - it tells TP that he can bet you on the river and it tells a set that you will likely fold to an overbet. The call on the end is sort of a odds play. Half the time he got his TP and the other half its a value bet with a set. But since the pot is giving you better than 2:1, its a good call, IMO.
Reply With Quote
DimitriT
Old 08-23-2005, 03:58 PM #8 (permalink)  
DimitriT's Avatar
Full House

Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 614
DimitriT
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rondavu
You bet the turn because it's an obvious top pair. A set isn't raising a disconnected rainbow board on the flop if it knows what's good for it. Value bet the turn or just punch it.
I'm not sure its obvious. Given the preflop action, an overpair is likely. I would lead out witha set in this case.
Reply With Quote
Rondavu
Old 08-23-2005, 05:36 PM #9 (permalink)  
Rondavu's Avatar
4-of-a-Kind

Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,053
Rondavu
Quote:
Originally Posted by DimitriT
I think checking behind is a reasonable play - it tells TP that he can bet you on the river and it tells a set that you will likely fold to an overbet. The call on the end is sort of a odds play. Half the time he got his TP and the other half its a value bet with a set. But since the pot is giving you better than 2:1, its a good call, IMO.
I respect that. I think it's a better play against a smart player however. I think you lose value against inexperienced or bad players since KT and AT will pay you off here. I think it's important not to give some players too much credit, less you miss out.
It's not what's inside that counts. Have you seen what's inside?
Internal organs. And they're getting uglier by the minute.
 
Reply With Quote
Bmxicle
Old 08-24-2005, 02:06 AM #10 (permalink)  
Bmxicle's Avatar
Full House

Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 947
Bmxicle
Send a message via AIM to Bmxicle
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rondavu
Quote:
Originally Posted by DimitriT
I think checking behind is a reasonable play - it tells TP that he can bet you on the river and it tells a set that you will likely fold to an overbet. The call on the end is sort of a odds play. Half the time he got his TP and the other half its a value bet with a set. But since the pot is giving you better than 2:1, its a good call, IMO.
I respect that. I think it's a better play against a smart player however. I think you lose value against inexperienced or bad players since KT and AT will pay you off here. I think it's important not to give some players too much credit, less you miss out.
yeah i completely agree w/ that but he said he had no reads, so although it is probably correct to assume he is a donk, he may not be.
Reply With Quote
Reply
Latest Poker News
KoRnholio Old 05-26-2012, 03:08 PM    Australia Legalized Online Poker coming up in next 6 to 12 Months
According to an email sent out by Mark Bryan, a gaming analyst at Merrill Lynch, the Australian government plans to legalize online poker sometime in the next six to 12 months. This move will coincide ...

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 11:46 PM.


FTR Testimonials

All content
© FlopTurnRiver.com
Advertising  |   Partners  |   Testimonials  |   T&C  |   Contact Us  |   FTR News & Press  |   Site Map  |   Search FTR

Full Tilt  |   Titan Poker  |   UltimateBet  |   Poker Stars  |   Ladbrokes Bonus  |   Sportsbook  |   Cake Poker  

Play Texas Holdem Online, Online Texas Holdem Strategy, & Poker Forum
This is not a gambling website.